[17:49] <JoernS> hi
[17:49] <wxl> howdy
[19:16] <agaida> hi
[19:18] <JoernS> moin agaida
[19:24] <phillw> hiyas JoernS and agaida
[19:24] <phillw> o/xwl :)
[19:24] <phillw> wxl !!!
[19:33] <JoernS> good night!
[19:46] <phillw> ooh net split
[19:53] <agaida> hi - i don't know how you see these things - but opinions are welcome: https://github.com/lxde/lxqt/issues/1043
[20:07]  * agaida think - and this would be cool, only english in the packages for both debian and ubuntu, no need for translators - save us a lot of work
[20:09] <phillw> agaida: this passed my email today from lxde mailing list.. http://paste.ubuntu.com/16208382/
[20:10] <agaida> that means exactly that the release tar balls will have no translations in it
[20:11] <agaida> so the resulting language in all packages will be only english
[20:11] <agaida> :P
[20:11] <agaida> and no, i'm not joking
[20:12] <agaida> it's a shame that the most programmers have no packaging experience or do not care of downstream needs
[20:13] <agaida> and i can repeat myself - pulling in translations at build time on in a build chroot is a no go
[20:13] <phillw> agaida: I did mention this to jleclanche and or LStranger recently, I know lxde have things under way, so may be ask on #lxde as to their current thinking?
[20:15] <agaida> i think that LStanger like an external decoupled translation process - thats why he is not happy with the current translation situation and the state of pootle
[20:17] <agaida> and l like a translation process in that way too - but the resulting translations have to be a part of the repository and a release tar ball
[20:17] <phillw> agaida: yeah, you chatted to jleclanche the other day
[20:18] <agaida> imnsho deleting translations from the repo is one step to far, its simply nuts
[20:27] <wxl> wait, what?
[20:27] <teward> ?
[20:28] <teward> oops wrong channel sorry
[20:28] <wxl> ah ha!
[20:28] <wxl> so i'm not the only one
[20:28] <ianorlin> teward no it was not the wrong questoin mark really
[20:28] <teward> ianorlin: for me it was
[20:28] <wxl> ¿
[20:28] <tsimonq2> O_o
[20:29] <tsimonq2> :P
[20:29] <ianorlin> well ? makes sense as a response to what agaida posted earlier
[20:30] <teward> ianorlin: coincidental then
[20:30] <wxl> ianorlin: i *THINK* they're discussing something that relates pretty much exclusively to upstream lxqt, though it might have some downstream effect.
[20:31] <ianorlin> yes I understand
[20:31] <agaida> wxl: we in that case are downstream, i wear may debian hat
[20:31] <agaida> :)
[20:32] <wxl> agaida: the ultimate question is how it relates to the development of lubuntu, which is of course, the topic of this channel, so—
[20:33] <agaida> i guess it should not harm LXDE - but hey, nice to know that you are not interested in LXQt any longer :)
[20:33] <teward> lel
[20:33] <wxl> that seems like a strange conclusion
[20:33] <teward> lol*
[20:33] <teward> i wouldn't have jumped to that conclusion, agaida, AFAIK they're still interested in LXQt :P
[20:33] <agaida> so - it relates to lubuntu development
[20:34] <agaida> teward: oops - i forget the <sarcasm> tags
[20:34] <phillw> :D
[20:34] <teward> :P
[20:35] <teward> agaida: sorry, my Sarcasm plugins are disabled - they ended up segfaulting a while ago when the evil drama of some non-*buntu stuff broke my brain :P
[20:35] <teward> so :
[20:35] <teward> :P *
[20:35]  * wxl sighs
[20:43] <phillw> wxl: btw,  in amongst the emails today, did you catch the bit of Julien taking a break? I tried to ping you over the weekend to let you know.
[20:44] <wxl> phillw: there was some circular discussion around what might be perceived as such a thing.
[20:45] <phillw> okies, yeah ... it came in an email reply from Julien to me regarding lxqt :)
[20:45] <phillw> he didn't indicate the length of time, just needs a break.
[22:48] <ianorlin> wxl ok qterminal testcase done
[22:59] <wxl> good job ianorlin !