[12:33] <ricotz> rtg, hey :)
[12:33] <rtg> hmm ?
[12:34] <ricotz> rtg, there are a bunch of i915_bpo changes in 4.6.0-3.4 which needs to be reverted
[12:34] <ricotz> https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/unstable/log/?qt=grep&q=UBUNTU%3A+SAUCE%3A+i915_bpo%3A
[12:34] <rtg> ricotz, I've ripped out i915_bpo from unstable.
[12:34] <ricotz> otherwise this kernel won't work 
[12:35] <ricotz> rtg, not really
[12:35] <ricotz> "git grep i915_bpo" shows a lot of calls
[12:36] <ricotz> the extern decls in include/drm/i915_drm_bpo.h are masking it
[12:36] <rtg> ricotz, hang on a sec, I'm checking
[12:38] <rtg> ricotz, indeed. guess I need to o a more thorough job
[12:38] <rtg> to do*
[12:38] <ricotz> remove the sauce ;)
[12:39] <rtg> yup. the laptop I booted on didn't have i915. 
[12:39] <ricotz> it even boots and runs here but is fundamentally borked
[14:00] <rtg> ricotz, i915_bpo is really, really gone this time (I hope)
[14:07] <ricotz> rtg, heh
[14:07] <ricotz> rtg, better rebase-skip dm-raid4-5 too instead of applying and reverting it
[14:08] <rtg> ricotz, I thought I'd leave it as a reminder. I need to consult smb about it
[14:10] <ricotz> rtg, I see, just saying there are bunch of similar applies/revert in the history which might not be worth the hassle 
[14:11] <rtg> ricotz, IIRC dm-raid4-5 is pretty much isolated (unlike i915_bpo), but I'll check and make sure.
[14:12] <smb> rtg, thought that was already killed in last release... but maybe not. if my memory serves right there would be only very limited use for it. Intel fake raid is done my md(adm) which left only very limited chips that would be supported by dmraid with raid 4 or 5
[14:13] <ricotz> rtg, ok
[14:13] <rtg> smb, I think it still compiled in Xenial, but no longer does. 
[14:14] <rtg> I'll rip it out completely in Yakkety
[14:14] <ricotz> seems always good to reduce the diff to upstream ;) while carrying like 650 commits on top
[14:14] <smb> rtg, +1 from me 
[14:15] <rtg> ricotz, once I get a working kernel I'll be compacting a lot of the history. there is a bunch of noise in the commit history that could go
[14:17] <ricotz> ok
[14:18] <ricotz> rtg, I assume 4.6 is going to hit the archive soon then?
[14:19] <rtg> ricotz, working on it. as soon as it passes some basic testing I'll get it promoted to Yakkety
[14:19] <ricotz> tseliot, hi, graphics-drivers ppa contains a patched 364 for 4.6, maybe it applies against 361 too
[14:20] <ricotz> rtg, alright
[14:20] <rtg> ricotz, oh, and I also have to make sure the DKMS drivers continue to at least compile
[14:20] <rtg> always a PITA
[14:20] <ricotz> exactly ;)
[14:20] <ricotz> nvidia-364 works fine here
[14:21] <ricotz> so 331, 340 and 361 needs a bit of work
[14:22] <ricotz> s/331/304
[14:28] <jdstrand> jsalisbury: ok, I'm finally back to helping with the bisect of bug #1547619. see comments 35 and 36
[14:28] <jsalisbury> jdstrand, ack, thanks
[14:41] <tseliot> ricotz: I'll have a look at it, thanks!
[16:17] <Odd_Bloke> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Newsletter suggests that new SRU kernels will be landing today; I know there was some slippage recently, does this account for that?
[16:26] <kamal> Odd_Bloke, we ended up releasing Xenial on Friday (a few days early) -- I think the rest are on target to be released in the next day or two
[16:27] <Odd_Bloke> kamal: Cool, thanks. :)