| flocculant | xubuntu yak images failed to build this morning, not sure why other than it's Friday 13th ... | 06:18 |
|---|---|---|
| yofel | ^ Third time's the charm - nmqt now with a commit revert that breaks the ABI when built against nm ">= 1.2.0" (which is also in -proposed) | 09:05 |
| yofel | *reverted | 09:05 |
| xnox | mdeslaur, ^ synced over to unapproved queue for sru team review | 09:41 |
| cjwatson | flocculant: did you check the logs? | 10:02 |
| cjwatson | flocculant: looks like the same transient 503s from Launchpad that sil2100 was asking about in #ubuntu-devel re touch builds | 10:04 |
| cjwatson | flocculant: so I think my answer is the same, 503s can happen for various reasons and cdimage should probably be taught to backoff and retry | 10:04 |
| mdeslaur | xnox: great, thanks | 10:55 |
| flocculant | I did quickly look - then forgot and got on with morning stuff - thanks though :) | 12:32 |
| flocculant | cjwatson: ^^ | 12:32 |
| rbasak | pitti: see bug 1581535 please. | 14:52 |
| ubot5 | bug 1581535 in libnl3 (Ubuntu) "libnl upgrade breaks Network Manager" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1581535 | 14:52 |
| rbasak | rharper: ^ | 14:52 |
| pitti | rbasak: meh, wasn't that supposed to be fixed in bug 1539634? | 14:57 |
| ubot5 | bug 1539634 in network-manager (Ubuntu Trusty) "network-manager crashes when using libnl-3-200-3.21.1-1ubuntu1" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1539634 | 14:57 |
| seb128 | could somebody review that accountsservice upload ^ | 14:57 |
| rbasak | pitti: was a Breaks correctly added? If not I'm wondering if some users have only a partial update. | 14:57 |
| seb128 | it's a regression fix for a SRU that went to xenial-updates yesterday :-/ | 14:57 |
| seb128 | wait | 14:58 |
| seb128 | there might be an issue with the patch | 14:58 |
| seb128 | grrr | 14:59 |
| rbasak | pitti: I don't see one. | 14:59 |
| seb128 | shrug, yes | 14:59 |
| seb128 | fixing | 14:59 |
| pitti | rbasak: I guess that calls for another update then | 15:01 |
| pitti | sorry, I need to run in about 15 mins.. | 15:01 |
| pitti | I asked on the bug whether the reporters have the current NM | 15:01 |
| pitti | i. e. whether this is something different than 1539634 or just the missing breaks | 15:02 |
| rbasak | pitti: if it is the missing Breaks, then I'm not sure another update will necessarily help. It might, but why are users picking up one update but not the other? | 15:03 |
| pitti | rbasak: not for the ones who already partially upgraded, but for new upgrades of course | 15:04 |
| pitti | we could also pull 3.2.21-1ubuntu1 from trusty-updates in the meantime | 15:04 |
| pitti | and then upload -1ubuntu2 with the breaks: | 15:04 |
| seb128 | bah | 15:07 |
| seb128 | ^ right one this time | 15:07 |
| rbasak | pitti: that sounds reasonable. But I'm not confident I understand what's going on without a report that contains version numbers :-/ | 15:07 |
| rbasak | Especially as it seems odd that some users would get a libnl3 update but not a network-manager update. | 15:07 |
| pitti | rbasak, rharper: I pulled the update from trusty-updates for now and followed up to both bugs | 15:10 |
| seb128 | pitti, can you review accountsservice ^? sorry for the nag but it's a xenial-updates regression from a SRU copied yesterday :-/ | 15:11 |
| rbasak | pitti: thank you for your help. | 15:11 |
| pitti | seb128: accepted, xenial task added; please upload to yakkety too, and nag some US archive admins (like bdmurray) to sru-release this in a few hours after build/test | 15:13 |
| * pitti needs to run, sorry | 15:13 | |
| seb128 | pitti, already uploaded to yakkety | 15:14 |
| seb128 | pitti, thanks! | 15:14 |
| pitti | ah good, thanks | 15:14 |
| pitti | seb128: yakkety FTBFS | 15:14 |
| seb128 | pitti, fixed already, that was my "ups/reject/reupload" dance | 15:15 |
| pitti | mismatched tag at line 15, column 27, byte 562 at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl5/5.22/XML/Parser.pm line 187. | 15:15 |
| seb128 | pitti, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/0.6.40-2ubuntu13.1 | 15:15 |
| pitti | Makefile:863: recipe for target 'org.freedesktop.accounts.policy' failed | 15:15 |
| pitti | seb128: ah, ok | 15:15 |
| * pitti waves | 15:16 | |
| seb128 | pitti, have a good w.e! | 15:25 |
| === pete-woo_ is now known as pete-woods | ||
| seb128 | bdmurray, some other SRU team member, can you look at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/0.6.40-2ubuntu11.1 ? see backlog | 16:11 |
| seb128 | it's a xenial-updates regression | 16:11 |
| bdmurray | seb128: looking | 16:13 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, thanks | 16:13 |
| bdmurray | seb128: and you want it released to -updates today? Is it urgent for some reason? | 16:16 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, it's a regression from a previous update | 16:16 |
| seb128 | if not can be block/delete the previous upload? | 16:17 |
| seb128 | but it impacts some side feature | 16:17 |
| seb128 | so no, not critical to get fixed today | 16:17 |
| bdmurray | the current accountsservice SRU is at 50%, so we could manually set it to 0 | 16:17 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, your call, I don't know what are the standard rules for regressions, pitti seemed to suggest earlier than the regression fix should be moved over | 16:25 |
| seb128 | but as said it's not a critical bug | 16:25 |
| seb128 | so probably fine to wait next week | 16:25 |
| bdmurray | Given that 0.6.40-2ubuntu11 introduced a regression, I'd prefer to be cautious and release 11.1 on Monday when people are around to fix any other issues. | 16:26 |
| seb128 | k | 16:26 |
| bdmurray | infinity: Could you halt the phasing of accountsservice due to a regression? 'change-override -z 0 -s xenial-updates -S accountsservice' should do the job | 17:37 |
| infinity | bdmurray: Iz done. | 17:38 |
| bdmurray | thanks | 17:39 |
| bdmurray | infinity: the change-override setting might have conflicted with the phased-updater. Could you run it again? | 19:23 |
| infinity | bdmurray: Did we delete all the arch:all binaries? :) | 19:23 |
| infinity | Oh, or you just went from 50 to 60 instead of 50 to 0. | 19:24 |
| bdmurray | right the phased-updater may have been running at the same time | 19:26 |
| bdmurray | 2016-05-13 18:26:03,150 - INFO - Incremented p-u-p for xenial-updates accountsservice from 50% to 60% | 19:26 |
| infinity | bdmurray: Yeah, will fix. | 19:26 |
| bdmurray | infinity: Have you seen bug 1581535? I'm wondering if there is more we should / could do. | 21:09 |
| ubot5 | bug 1581535 in libnl3 (Ubuntu Trusty) "libnl upgrade breaks Network Manager" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1581535 | 21:09 |
| infinity | bdmurray: I reverted, and phased the revert to 100. | 21:13 |
| infinity | bdmurray: There's very little else we can do except cry. | 21:13 |
| bdmurray | infinity: Okay, I'll see if I can figure out how to do that. | 21:14 |
| infinity | bdmurray: Note that -1ubuntu1.1 in updates now is the same as -1 (ie: a full revert), -1ubuntu3 in proposed is the same as -1ubuntu1, but with the versioned Breaks that should have been there, and fixed symbols. | 21:15 |
| infinity | bdmurray: Figure out how to do.. What? Cry? | 21:15 |
| bdmurray | infinity: Yes, cry. | 21:15 |
| infinity | bdmurray: I'm mildly annoyed that the people who were aware of this bug in -proposed didn't think about the partial upgrade case. | 21:17 |
| infinity | bdmurray: But what's done is done. :( | 21:17 |
| bdmurray | I guess I could comment on the bug regarding the new libnl uploads | 21:18 |
| infinity | bdmurray: I did, but feel free to be more verbose. | 21:18 |
| infinity | bdmurray: The other workaround here to be mildly helpful might be to phase n-m to 100%. | 21:20 |
| infinity | bdmurray: So people who did get half upgraded might have a hope of being fully upgraded before their network explodes. | 21:20 |
| infinity | bdmurray: Gah. In fact, your scripts dropped it to 0%, which is exactly the opposite of helpful. | 21:21 |
| bdmurray | infinity: So fully phasing sounds like a good idea then. | 21:22 |
| infinity | bdmurray: Yeah, doing now. | 21:22 |
| infinity | bdmurray: AIUI, new n-m and old libnl are fine together, but the inverse explodes. | 21:23 |
| infinity | bdmurray: So we can fully phase n-m, hope that fixes some people by accident, then re-evaluate libnl on Monday. | 21:23 |
| bdmurray | infinity: I tested new n-m and old libnl in a VM and it seemed okay. The applet displayed and I could get to web sites. | 21:24 |
| infinity | bdmurray: Right, that's what I'd expect. | 21:24 |
| infinity | Very unfortunate to break people's networks, though, when that's the only way they can get fixes. :/ | 21:26 |
| infinity | I foresee a lot of people phoning their nerd friends this weekend. | 21:26 |
| infinity | bdmurray: Did you see the guy in one of the bug logs whose solution was "I bought a DVD player and reinstalled Ubuntu"? | 21:27 |
| infinity | A for effort, but ouch. | 21:27 |
| bdmurray | Surely, a DVD drive not player? | 21:27 |
| infinity | He said player, I assume drive. :P | 21:28 |
| infinity | Unless he just means he was so frustrated that he went on a manic electronics purchasing spree. | 21:28 |
| tgm4883 | could have been a software dvd player | 21:29 |
| infinity | Anyhow, here's hoping the intersection of people who half upgraded and people who rebooted already before I pushed fixes and people who have no idea how to fix the result is reasonably small. :/ | 21:30 |
| infinity | Cause we're out of ways to help them remotely. | 21:30 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!