[00:14] crickets [00:14] chirrp [00:42] Downloading my third attempt at ISO to bootable flash. I need 16.04 and 64 bit to get Chrome? [00:43] chrome 32 bit no longer supported [01:29] cfhowlett_thanks [01:29] happy2help! Maynard [01:31] You know if UNetbootin is a good iso to bootable flash? Someone insisted in chat that I had to start over...... that was 7 hours or so ago. Working with a zippy 500Mb/Sec here in the sticks. [01:31] Maynard, this is why you use torrents. [01:32] not direct download. torrents are usually faster. [01:32] unetbootin should work [01:32] the first 2 torrents I tried were 7-8 hours dl time. [01:33] AFTER all the users piped in! [01:34] After that the ISO failed and wouldn't boot anyhow so I had to dig for another stick that I'm currently using as a HD. SOmething with storage controller won't even see good drives I can write to. [01:35] cfhowlett_ [01:35] oops [01:35] torrents have much stronger integrity checking than direct download. [01:47] what do you mean integrity checking? [01:48] internal checks to ensure that the data downloaded matches the data source. same function you (should always) perform with md5sum [01:53] But the OG one that this other user insisted I erase to start over with came FROM ubuntu? How could torrent be better than from the Ubuntu's very own site? Also, talk like I'm a kid cause all this Ubuntu shite is totally new to me. I do GREAT on Windows. I know what md5sum means but no clue as to how to check it or anything of the sorts. [01:54] PS the OG from Ubuntu booted onto MANY flashes, drives, and SDs even. [01:54] Maynard, direct download does not have the safety features of torrent. that's the difference. [01:55] the torrent seed comes from ubuntu and the safety checks are performed with ubuntu's source codes. the process is different [01:55] In windows torrents are just as likely to have malware right? [01:55] HOw is it safer in Ubuntu? [01:56] direct downloads DO NOT do integrity checks. torrents do integrity checks. [01:57] in either case, you should do an md5sum of the .iso once you have it [01:57] ALso the one that failed (torrent) was .25Gb more...... making me think the failure was something someone added. [01:57] did you do the md5sum? [01:57] OK care to walk me through that? [01:57] !md5sum | Maynard [01:57] Maynard: To verify your Ubuntu ISO image (or other files for which an MD5 checksum is provided), see http://help.ubuntu.com/community/HowToMD5SUM or http://www.linuxquestions.org/linux/answers/LQ_ISO/Checking_the_md5sum_in_Windows [01:58] so when you type like that that means I type !md5sum in terminal? [01:58] no that means read the link from ubottu [01:59] OH I See YOU told it to do that. [02:01] Grrrrrrrrrr..... I didn't get anything there. Got booted off for some reason. [02:02] you can't get to the site? [02:02] I was trying to open it and got booted from the chat here. [02:03] !md5sum [02:03] To verify your Ubuntu ISO image (or other files for which an MD5 checksum is provided), see http://help.ubuntu.com/community/HowToMD5SUM or http://www.linuxquestions.org/linux/answers/LQ_ISO/Checking_the_md5sum_in_Windows [02:16] SOrry I have NO CLUE what I just read....... I feel so retarded when it comes to all the completely new names and filenames [15:01] yo [21:58] Anyone have any explanation for this, I'm Ubuntu Studio 16.04. I've re installed using a usb drive about ten times. everything appears fine yet at some point all my audio-video.graphics menus disappear. I can find and use the Apps using alt-f2 except for ardour and qjacked which seem to be gone altogether. I first thought this was happening as a result of upgradeing Ardour, but I now think it has to do with installing google chr [22:42] Installing Studio... It is going fine.