hikiko | hello | 04:24 |
---|---|---|
=== Drac0 is now known as Guest50085 | ||
Laney | ahoy ahohohohohohoy | 08:00 |
Laney | bleddy europeans | 08:04 |
willcooke | morning Laney | 08:08 |
Laney | how do willcooke? | 08:11 |
willcooke | typical lazy lefties | 08:11 |
davmor2 | Laney: you know we are Europeans right :P | 08:12 |
davmor2 | willcooke: you leave left handers out of it :P | 08:14 |
Laney | I've ordered the tug boats to start pulling | 08:14 |
Laney | by the end of the week we'll be 500m off NYC | 08:14 |
willcooke | :D | 08:15 |
davmor2 | Laney: can you make it florida instead be nice to get some actual sun | 08:15 |
Laney | pastrami | 08:16 |
=== Guest31360 is now known as fredp | ||
=== fredp is now known as Guest93037 | ||
willcooke | 16GB USB flash drives are now 3 quid. | 09:13 |
willcooke | ?! | 09:13 |
duflu | willcooke: Yes. Or AUD$8-$10 | 09:14 |
duflu | They may not last more than a week though | 09:14 |
willcooke | haha! | 09:14 |
willcooke | Very true | 09:14 |
duflu | Although the only one I remember dying of late was SanDisk brand | 09:15 |
duflu | willcooke: More amazing are 128GB and now 256GB microSDs | 09:15 |
willcooke | This is Toshiba, but I very much dobut that anyone who actually works at Toshiba has anything to do with it | 09:15 |
duflu | Just stare at them in wonder | 09:15 |
willcooke | O_o | 09:16 |
willcooke | The world has gone mad | 09:16 |
duflu | willcooke: I found the former recently for around 40 quid equivalent | 09:16 |
* willcooke grumbles about kids today | 09:16 | |
willcooke | 1TB SSDs are still pricey, but I expect people want those to last a few years min. | 09:17 |
duflu | More amazing that I can measure they do get the advertised 80MB/s | 09:17 |
willcooke | incredible | 09:18 |
* duflu also looks at the box of floppy disks he never sorted, and has no drive to read | 09:18 | |
willcooke | ha! yes. | 09:19 |
happyaron | willcooke duflu for performance I'd recommend sandisk cz80 | 09:52 |
happyaron | it's about 26gbp for 64gig | 09:52 |
willcooke | happyaron, good to know, thanks | 10:00 |
davmor2 | duflu: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/like/221953327364?limghlpsr=true&hlpv=2&ops=true&viphx=1&hlpht=true&lpid=122&chn=ps&googleloc=1007249&poi=&campaignid=207297426&device=c&adgroupid=13585920426&rlsatarget=pla-131843261346&adtype=pla&crdt=0&ff3=1&ff11=ICEP3.0.0-L&ff12=67&ff13=80&ff14=122 no excuses | 10:03 |
duflu | davmor2: OK then. I claim laziness now | 10:05 |
duflu | Also time to make dinner :) | 10:05 |
=== hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln | ||
Trevinho | hikiko|ln: hey, there are several MPs about the expo/scale fixes for bottom launcher... I mean some from handsomefeng, other yours... They're almost the same, but not sure if I'm missing something... Why this duplication? | 10:41 |
hikiko|ln | Trevinho, I think that handsome_feng is trying to fix the maximised window bug and for some reason he cloned my branches instead of starting from scratch | 10:45 |
hikiko|ln | if you see the branches they are identical | 10:45 |
hikiko|ln | I don't know why he used mine | 10:46 |
Trevinho | mh, I see | 10:46 |
Trevinho | well, unity side is different... | 10:46 |
hikiko|ln | well, my branches fix the scale and the expo | 10:47 |
hikiko|ln | feel free to merge them if they are ok | 10:48 |
hikiko|ln | and then we just add a depends on ... branch to handsome feng's | 10:48 |
hikiko|ln | so that we don't have duplicate changes | 10:48 |
Trevinho | hikiko|ln: ok, as his branch is not relly using your commit... But the raw diff. Anyway, yours fine... BUt you've to do an one line change: | 10:51 |
Trevinho | workArea.setBottom (optionGetYBottomOffset ()); | 10:51 |
Trevinho | has to be come: | 10:51 |
Trevinho | workArea.setBottom (workArea.bottom () + optionGetYBottomOffset ()); | 10:51 |
Trevinho | hikiko|ln: can you fix this, so I can add it to the landing list? | 10:51 |
hikiko|ln | sure give me a minute | 10:51 |
hikiko|ln | 5 minutes :p | 10:51 |
hikiko|ln | brb | 10:51 |
Trevinho | hikiko|ln: ok | 10:52 |
hikiko|ln | Trevinho, are you sure this is needed? | 11:04 |
hikiko|ln | it won't make the area appear larger? | 11:05 |
Trevinho | hikiko|ln: mhmhmh.... Well, let me think... it should be workArea.bottom () - offset actually... isn't it? | 11:07 |
hikiko|ln | no | 11:07 |
hikiko|ln | it should be == bottomYOffset | 11:07 |
hikiko|ln | because when the workarea quad is made | 11:07 |
hikiko|ln | the bottom is subtracted | 11:08 |
Trevinho | hikiko|ln: well, workarea bottom could be not zero when you've two monitor stacked vertically | 11:08 |
Trevinho | well, sorry I didn't want to mean 0.. but monitor height | 11:08 |
hikiko|ln | certainly not 0 but I think it should be ybottom offset | 11:08 |
Trevinho | hikiko|ln: yeah, but you've to take in consideration the old value for botom() | 11:09 |
hikiko|ln | let me check | 11:09 |
Trevinho | if you've two monitors stacked vertically, the top one has a bottom that is non zero... | 11:09 |
hikiko|ln | right | 11:10 |
hikiko|ln | I got it | 11:10 |
hikiko|ln | so on single monitor bottom = 0 | 11:11 |
hikiko|ln | and we can safely do bottom + offset | 11:11 |
hikiko|ln | ok :) give me a minute to run it and I push it | 11:12 |
=== JanC is now known as Guest47278 | ||
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
hikiko|ln | Trevinho, I pushed the change, thank you | 11:36 |
hikiko|ln | wait a min where's the expo change : | 11:40 |
hikiko|ln | Trevinho, wait a sec the expo change is missing from this branch | 11:42 |
hikiko|ln | no it's there | 11:43 |
hikiko|ln | :p | 11:43 |
hikiko|ln | ignore :) | 11:43 |
desrt | hello humans | 11:46 |
willcooke | hi desrt | 11:46 |
hikiko|ln | hi desrt | 11:47 |
hikiko|ln | ttys again \m/ reboot :/ | 11:49 |
=== hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko | ||
desrt | good morning willcooke, hikiko|ln | 11:58 |
desrt | everyone have a good weekend? | 11:58 |
hikiko | wow, I forgot it's monday :) | 11:59 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
a1fa | ood day guys | 12:37 |
andyrock | hey guys | 12:39 |
a1fa | hikiko: i was finally able to document the bug with the disappearing windows | 12:44 |
=== alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
=== manu is now known as Guest99998 | ||
* Laney is attacking 3.20 css | 14:42 | |
* davmor2 sounds like the 3.20 css is winning, put some effort in laney ;) | 14:43 | |
Laney | I SHALL BE VICTORIOUS | 14:49 |
Trevinho | Laney: you will | 15:30 |
* davmor2 bets £80 on 3.20 css and £100 on Laney I like to edge my bets :) | 15:32 | |
Laney | quite bad currently | 15:37 |
Laney | less bad than it was though | 15:37 |
willcooke | gnight all | 17:08 |
=== manu is now known as Guest95278 | ||
willcooke | meh, forgot about meetings later | 18:07 |
willcooke | going afk, back to speak to robert_ancell later | 18:07 |
Trevinho | Ouch, I'm getting a build failure in unity in yakkety ppc64el.... How can i debug that... I guess quemu isn't the best thing, right? | 20:25 |
Laney | TREVINHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO | 20:25 |
Trevinho | LANEEEEEEEEEYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY | 20:25 |
Laney | link? | 20:26 |
Laney | can probably sort out access to a box | 20:26 |
Laney | but tomorrow | 20:26 |
Trevinho | Laney: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/259848746/buildlog_ubuntu-yakkety-ppc64el.unity_7.5.0+16.10.20160516.1-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz | 20:26 |
Trevinho | Laney: oh, that would be coooool | 20:26 |
Laney | did you retry? | 20:26 |
* Trevinho checks if there's something in the code that could trigger it... But that test lived there for years with no issue in all archs | 20:26 | |
Trevinho | so..... | 20:26 |
Trevinho | Laney: yep | 20:27 |
Trevinho | twice | 20:27 |
Trevinho | same crash, same pos | 20:27 |
Laney | k | 20:27 |
Trevinho | Laney: thanks | 20:27 |
Laney | pitti can also help with that | 20:27 |
Trevinho | Mh, actually there's something that could trigger it in code.... But.... I see it only in that arch, so it's quite bizarre | 20:31 |
willcooke | morning robert_ancell | 21:05 |
willcooke | *pounce* | 21:05 |
robert_ancell | willcooke, hikiko | 21:05 |
willcooke | :) | 21:05 |
robert_ancell | willcooke, or hi | 21:05 |
willcooke | he! | 21:05 |
willcooke | heh | 21:05 |
willcooke | robert_ancell, attente - gimme 5 mins to finish this email and I'll be with you | 21:05 |
hikiko | robert_ancell, hi | 21:06 |
robert_ancell | hikiko, hi! | 21:06 |
willcooke | robert_ancell, attente ok done | 21:12 |
willcooke | g'night all | 21:50 |
attente | robert_ancell: the branch is on git.gnome.org as wip/temp/ubuntu-xenial-rebased-corrected | 21:52 |
attente | robert_ancell: at some point, i gave up on properly amending commits and just did a fix-up patch in the end | 21:53 |
robert_ancell | attente, cool | 21:53 |
attente | but basically it should be the same result as a resolved merge between GNOME_SOFTWARE_3_20_2 and wip/ubuntu-xenial | 21:53 |
robert_ancell | attente, ok, I pushed to wip/rancell/ubuntu-xenial-rebase | 21:57 |
robert_ancell | I think the merge commit got confused, but hopefully it worked.. | 21:58 |
attente | robert_ancell: ok, i'll check the diff after dinner | 22:02 |
a1fa | xset m 0 0 | 22:39 |
a1fa | Andrea, you here? | 23:45 |
a1fa | thanks for picking up that bug ;) | 23:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!