[04:24] hello === Drac0 is now known as Guest50085 [08:00] ahoy ahohohohohohoy [08:04] bleddy europeans [08:08] morning Laney [08:11] how do willcooke? [08:11] typical lazy lefties [08:12] Laney: you know we are Europeans right :P [08:14] willcooke: you leave left handers out of it :P [08:14] I've ordered the tug boats to start pulling [08:14] by the end of the week we'll be 500m off NYC [08:15] :D [08:15] Laney: can you make it florida instead be nice to get some actual sun [08:16] pastrami === Guest31360 is now known as fredp === fredp is now known as Guest93037 [09:13] 16GB USB flash drives are now 3 quid. [09:13] ?! [09:14] willcooke: Yes. Or AUD$8-$10 [09:14] They may not last more than a week though [09:14] haha! [09:14] Very true [09:15] Although the only one I remember dying of late was SanDisk brand [09:15] willcooke: More amazing are 128GB and now 256GB microSDs [09:15] This is Toshiba, but I very much dobut that anyone who actually works at Toshiba has anything to do with it [09:15] Just stare at them in wonder [09:16] O_o [09:16] The world has gone mad [09:16] willcooke: I found the former recently for around 40 quid equivalent [09:16] * willcooke grumbles about kids today [09:17] 1TB SSDs are still pricey, but I expect people want those to last a few years min. [09:17] More amazing that I can measure they do get the advertised 80MB/s [09:18] incredible [09:18] * duflu also looks at the box of floppy disks he never sorted, and has no drive to read [09:19] ha! yes. [09:52] willcooke duflu for performance I'd recommend sandisk cz80 [09:52] it's about 26gbp for 64gig [10:00] happyaron, good to know, thanks [10:03] duflu: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/like/221953327364?limghlpsr=true&hlpv=2&ops=true&viphx=1&hlpht=true&lpid=122&chn=ps&googleloc=1007249&poi=&campaignid=207297426&device=c&adgroupid=13585920426&rlsatarget=pla-131843261346&adtype=pla&crdt=0&ff3=1&ff11=ICEP3.0.0-L&ff12=67&ff13=80&ff14=122 no excuses [10:05] davmor2: OK then. I claim laziness now [10:05] Also time to make dinner :) === hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln [10:41] hikiko|ln: hey, there are several MPs about the expo/scale fixes for bottom launcher... I mean some from handsomefeng, other yours... They're almost the same, but not sure if I'm missing something... Why this duplication? [10:45] Trevinho, I think that handsome_feng is trying to fix the maximised window bug and for some reason he cloned my branches instead of starting from scratch [10:45] if you see the branches they are identical [10:46] I don't know why he used mine [10:46] mh, I see [10:46] well, unity side is different... [10:47] well, my branches fix the scale and the expo [10:48] feel free to merge them if they are ok [10:48] and then we just add a depends on ... branch to handsome feng's [10:48] so that we don't have duplicate changes [10:51] hikiko|ln: ok, as his branch is not relly using your commit... But the raw diff. Anyway, yours fine... BUt you've to do an one line change: [10:51] workArea.setBottom (optionGetYBottomOffset ()); [10:51] has to be come: [10:51] workArea.setBottom (workArea.bottom () + optionGetYBottomOffset ()); [10:51] hikiko|ln: can you fix this, so I can add it to the landing list? [10:51] sure give me a minute [10:51] 5 minutes :p [10:51] brb [10:52] hikiko|ln: ok [11:04] Trevinho, are you sure this is needed? [11:05] it won't make the area appear larger? [11:07] hikiko|ln: mhmhmh.... Well, let me think... it should be workArea.bottom () - offset actually... isn't it? [11:07] no [11:07] it should be == bottomYOffset [11:07] because when the workarea quad is made [11:08] the bottom is subtracted [11:08] hikiko|ln: well, workarea bottom could be not zero when you've two monitor stacked vertically [11:08] well, sorry I didn't want to mean 0.. but monitor height [11:08] certainly not 0 but I think it should be ybottom offset [11:09] hikiko|ln: yeah, but you've to take in consideration the old value for botom() [11:09] let me check [11:09] if you've two monitors stacked vertically, the top one has a bottom that is non zero... [11:10] right [11:10] I got it [11:11] so on single monitor bottom = 0 [11:11] and we can safely do bottom + offset [11:12] ok :) give me a minute to run it and I push it === JanC is now known as Guest47278 === JanC_ is now known as JanC [11:36] Trevinho, I pushed the change, thank you [11:40] wait a min where's the expo change : [11:42] Trevinho, wait a sec the expo change is missing from this branch [11:43] no it's there [11:43] :p [11:43] ignore :) [11:46] hello humans [11:46] hi desrt [11:47] hi desrt [11:49] ttys again \m/ reboot :/ === hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko [11:58] good morning willcooke, hikiko|ln [11:58] everyone have a good weekend? [11:59] wow, I forgot it's monday :) === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch [12:37] ood day guys [12:39] hey guys [12:44] hikiko: i was finally able to document the bug with the disappearing windows === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g === manu is now known as Guest99998 [14:42] * Laney is attacking 3.20 css [14:43] * davmor2 sounds like the 3.20 css is winning, put some effort in laney ;) [14:49] I SHALL BE VICTORIOUS [15:30] Laney: you will [15:32] * davmor2 bets £80 on 3.20 css and £100 on Laney I like to edge my bets :) [15:37] quite bad currently [15:37] less bad than it was though [17:08] gnight all === manu is now known as Guest95278 [18:07] meh, forgot about meetings later [18:07] going afk, back to speak to robert_ancell later [20:25] Ouch, I'm getting a build failure in unity in yakkety ppc64el.... How can i debug that... I guess quemu isn't the best thing, right? [20:25] TREVINHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO [20:25] LANEEEEEEEEEYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY [20:26] link? [20:26] can probably sort out access to a box [20:26] but tomorrow [20:26] Laney: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/259848746/buildlog_ubuntu-yakkety-ppc64el.unity_7.5.0+16.10.20160516.1-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz [20:26] Laney: oh, that would be coooool [20:26] did you retry? [20:26] * Trevinho checks if there's something in the code that could trigger it... But that test lived there for years with no issue in all archs [20:26] so..... [20:27] Laney: yep [20:27] twice [20:27] same crash, same pos [20:27] k [20:27] Laney: thanks [20:27] pitti can also help with that [20:31] Mh, actually there's something that could trigger it in code.... But.... I see it only in that arch, so it's quite bizarre [21:05] morning robert_ancell [21:05] *pounce* [21:05] willcooke, hikiko [21:05] :) [21:05] willcooke, or hi [21:05] he! [21:05] heh [21:05] robert_ancell, attente - gimme 5 mins to finish this email and I'll be with you [21:06] robert_ancell, hi [21:06] hikiko, hi! [21:12] robert_ancell, attente ok done [21:50] g'night all [21:52] robert_ancell: the branch is on git.gnome.org as wip/temp/ubuntu-xenial-rebased-corrected [21:53] robert_ancell: at some point, i gave up on properly amending commits and just did a fix-up patch in the end [21:53] attente, cool [21:53] but basically it should be the same result as a resolved merge between GNOME_SOFTWARE_3_20_2 and wip/ubuntu-xenial [21:57] attente, ok, I pushed to wip/rancell/ubuntu-xenial-rebase [21:58] I think the merge commit got confused, but hopefully it worked.. [22:02] robert_ancell: ok, i'll check the diff after dinner [22:39] xset m 0 0 [23:45] Andrea, you here? [23:46] thanks for picking up that bug ;)