/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/05/17/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

* Laif hi :)04:48
=== hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln
=== hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko
=== tinoco is now known as tinocoff
tdaitxhello! could someone set LP: #1581835 priority to Whishlist for both OpenJDK 8 and 7? thanks! =)16:25
ubot5Launchpad bug 1581835 in openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) "Enable native GTK Look and Feel for non-gnome desktops" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/158183516:25
tewardtdaitx: done16:26
tdaitxteward: thanks! =)16:26
tdaitxLP: #1580162 could probably be set as triaged, the fix is available/commited upstream and will be integrated on the next OpenJDK-8 update16:28
ubot5Launchpad bug 1580162 in openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) "My project triggers JDK-8066871" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/158016216:28
tewardtdaitx: importance?16:28
tewardtdaitx: triaged, agreed, but it should probably get an importance set, and I can't get to the KB article they linked heh16:30
tdaitxteward: high? it does have a severe impact on a small portion of Ubuntu users, but only 1 user so far so I can see how medium could fit16:31
tewardi was steering towards Medium myself, but meh16:32
tewarddone16:32
tewardand that's all for me today, lunchtime over, back to work!16:32
tdaitxteward: many thanks =)16:32
teward:P16:32
=== tinocoff is now known as tinoco
patcableHi there -- I have https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1580952 committed in Xenial, but would also like to get the update tracked for Trusty as well. Would I apply the patch to 1.0.1-ubuntu2.13, up the version and update the changelog then do a debdiff and attach that to the ticket?18:54
ubot5Launchpad bug 1580952 in apt (Ubuntu Xenial) "[SRU] Update apt/xenial to 1.2.12" [Undecided,Fix committed]18:54
naccpatcable: you'll also need to request someone open a task for trusty itself in that bug18:57
naccpatcable: and might want to adjust the title as well18:57
patcableheh, someone else filed that bug18:57
patcablenacc: so then, would i file another SRU for trusty, then attach a debdiff?18:57
naccpatcable: no, you can request here (per the sru documentation) that a bugtask be created for trusty in that same bug18:58
naccpatcable: and then you'd attach your trusty debdiff to that same bug18:58
patcablealrighty19:00
naccpatcable: have you made a debdiff before?19:00
patcableI havent, but I'm working on updating changelog and doing a build now19:00
naccpatcable: ok19:01
patcablenacc would i just do a debdiff *changes or debdiff on apt-transport-https?19:10
naccpatcable: there are probably multiple ways fo doing this, but i use dpkg-buildpackage to generate the .dsc file(s)19:12
naccand then debdiff the .dsc files19:12
patcablehmm, i'll have to do this on a different machine then if i need to sign it with a key of some sort19:13
naccpatcable: it doesn't need to be signed for the purposes of the debdiff, iirc19:14
patcableah ok19:14
nacci tend to invoke it with: `dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -S -nc -d`19:14
naccthat's from a working directory containing the pacakge source19:14
patcableright, okay19:19
patcablenacc: should this file be huge? seeing a ton of docs that i didnt change in the diff19:21
naccpatcable: no it shouldn't, you mean the debdiff?19:22
patcableyeah19:23
naccpatcable: no, it should basically look like hte normal code patch, except you've also got a chagnelog change19:23
patcablethats what i thought. hm. let me try something again19:23
patcableah, ok. yep. I ran debuild before running your dpkg-buildpackage19:25
naccah yeah19:26
patcablecool. So I updated 1575877 with that debdiff file and ask for it to be tracked in trusty. i even made one for precise for laughs20:07
patcablewell... to be clear, I'm asking here for it to be tracked in trusty/precise :)20:08

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!