=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
[09:27] <yofel> hi, could someone please either accept networkmanager-qt in x-proposed or at least delete ubuntu1.2 in there? I misread the symbol diff and that package has a broken ABI (fixed in ubuntu1.3 by fixing the ABI break)
[09:54] <apw> yofel, i can only see the ubuntu1.3 in there so i assume someone did so, though why queuebot never mentioned it is a mystery
[10:01] <knome> apw, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__DrJI7mTHQ
[10:01] <yofel> apw: LP still tells me that 1.2 is in proposed and shows 1.3 in unapproved
[10:01] <apw> yofel, oh in -proposed, derp
=== alexabreu is now known as alex-abreu
[14:39] <yofel> RAOF: hi, as you seem to be SRU person of the day, could you please delete networkmanager-qt 5.18.0-0ubuntu1.2 from xenial-proposed until someone has the time to review 1.3?
[16:31] <infinity> yofel: Nitpick, when you restored those symbols, you should have restored them as they appeared in -0ubuntu1 (ie: tagged with "5.1.1+git20141203.0020+15.04")
[16:31] <infinity> yofel: Much harder to review it with the new version.
[16:32] <infinity> yofel: (And things that build against it will suddenly get unnecessary deps on the new version)
[16:33] <infinity> yofel: In fact, that's more than a nitpick, I'll probably reject for the latter reason.
[16:34] <infinity> yofel: Also, when reuploading an SRU over an SRU, you should use dpkg-genchanges -S -v(version-in-updates/release) to get all the changelog entries from previous proposed uploads.
[16:35] <infinity> yofel: Also, removed the broken one from proposed.
[18:34] <clivejo> how do I find someone to sponsor uploads to the yakkety archive?
[18:37] <nacc> clivejo: subscribe ubuntu-sponsors to the bug?
[18:37] <apw> clivejo, there are lots of people who do that sort of thing ... though normally one would put what you want sponsored in a bug and subscribe the ubuntu-sponsors team
[18:38] <clivejo> the problem is its not just one package, its a suite of packages for KDE Plasma Desktop
[18:46] <apw> clivejo, doesn't kde normally prep all that lot in a PPA, they could be copied from there instead
[18:47] <clivejo> apw: yes
[19:42] <clivejo> apw: just need someone who knows what we are up to and can do the uploads
[19:43] <clivejo> the kubuntu team is very low on people power at the moment and needs a bit of help getting the packages uploaded
[20:13] <clivejo> anyone suggest how I could get a sponsor?
[21:08] <Logan> clivejo: sgclark maybe?
[21:09] <clivejo> sgclark is having to step back a bit from kubuntu due to personal reasons
[21:09] <Logan> oh :(
[21:09] <Logan> I mean, I'm a MOTU
[21:10] <sgclark> ehm wait what. What about the release manager yofel?
[21:10] <clivejo> yofel isnt MOTU?
[21:10] <sgclark> neither am I lol
[21:10] <sgclark> but we can upload KDE seed
[21:10] <sgclark> so he should be able to...
[21:56] <stgraber> oh, let me re-upload that lxcfs one with a prettier version number, that one's kinda ugly
[22:04] <clivejo> sgclark: yofel is bit stressed out too at the moment, was looking for someone to sponsor me and see if I can develop the skills needed
[22:11] <sgclark> clivejo: I see. I doubt you will find someone to sponser such a massive amount of packages at once. I will do it, lets take this back to kubuntu-devel
[22:11] <clivejo> sgclark: I dont like pestering you or Phil, you both have other stuff going on
[22:12] <sgclark> this is very true. but it needs done no?
[22:13] <clivejo> well yes, you need frameworks 5.22 for apps 16.04
[22:13] <clivejo> would be nice to get them uploaded instead of copying between PPA's
[22:14] <sgclark> I said I would. Please answer me in kubuntu channel :)
[22:58] <Trevinho> hello, anyone from the SRU team? We'd need to move this silo to the process: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1316