=== yuning-afk is now known as yuning [03:18] apw: is there an eta on the fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-defaults/+bug/1574982 ? [03:18] Launchpad bug 1574982 in dkms (Ubuntu) "Cannot use CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG: -fstack-protector-strong not supported by compiler" [High,Confirmed] [03:19] (it looks like it will be fixed in the kernel?) === leftyfb_ is now known as leftyfb === inaddy is now known as tinoco [08:18] mwhudson, yes, that is already fixed in the unstable kernel and will be fixed in the curretn xenial sru kernel. when that copies out it will hit yakkety too [08:18] mwhudson, it got delayed some by anembargoed cve [08:29] apw: ta [08:30] mwhudson, applying the fix locally by hand is eminently doable if you are blocked by it [08:32] apw: it's causing an autopkgtest failure so that wouldn't be very helpful :-) [08:38] mwhudson, yeah we ahve a very large pile of those cause red on a lot of my packages, its been a huge pain to fix and deploy due to timing [08:39] apw: https://bostongazette.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/the-lego-movie-awesome-e1392309318427.png?w=600 [08:40] mwhudson, oh so very true === TJ_Remix is now known as TJ- === xnox_ is now known as xnox === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha === dgadomski_ is now known as dgadomski === tai271828_ is now known as tai271828 === henrix_ is now known as henrix === caribou_ is now known as caribou [13:25] ideas why self-built drm-intel-next kernel (for bisecting) fails to boot on a machine where the mainline build boots fine. same .config used, the new build built on xenial [13:25] it just hangs at "loading initrd" [13:25] dropping quiet et al does nothing [13:27] it's a rather old mainline checkout (3.18-rc5+), newer kernels built on this machine boot fine there [13:30] tjaalton, disable splash screen ? [13:30] nope [13:31] hmm I could try a chroot build on trusty [13:37] tjaalton: kernel or initrd.img corrupt? the message "Loading initrd" comes from GRUB; next step is the kernel starts spewing messages to console [13:37] tjaalton: is it booting with GRUB in GFX mode? if so, try changing it to text mode [13:38] I've done a number of builds, thought it was my config that failed to work on this (baytrail) machine [13:38] guess it's gfx mode [13:38] the default [13:39] tjaalton: also is it UEFI? I've seen some weirdness with UEFI GOP causing no video output [13:39] tjaalton, cirtianly we build the mainline builds in a chroot, the BUILT file tells you which [13:40] TJ-: efi [13:45] apw: right, it's actually vivid [14:46] apw, did you guys decide after uds what kernel version 16.10 might end up being ? [14:46] ogasawara, ^ ? [14:48] i am assuming 4.7/8 most likely 4.8, though its early to be deciding on the version in a non-LTS release [14:48] apw, ack thank for confirming [14:49] apw, I guess when we get close to freeze dates we might have a better idea [14:49] apw, I needed a ballpark for advising cust on what they should target wrt upstream patches .. I think we should tell them 4.7 [14:50] well they need to be pushing their patches a week ago to hit 4.7 anyhow right ? [14:50] yeah and they are for the most part [14:52] apw, but there are a lot of acpi bindings that might not make 4.7 but 4.8 instead .. probably I will need to sru those when the time comes === ghostcube__ is now known as ghostcube === mamarley is now known as Guest75717 === mamarley_ is now known as mamarley === zequence_ is now known as zequence