| mwhudson | adt-run ... --- qemu ~/adt-yakkety-amd64-cloud.img doesn't work for me at the moment | 01:37 |
|---|---|---|
| mwhudson | does it for everyone else? i made the image with adt-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud -r yakkety just now | 01:38 |
| mwhudson | failure is like this: http://paste.ubuntu.com/16484207/ | 01:38 |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === JoseeAntonioR is now known as jose | ||
| === vtapia_ is now known as vtapia | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| mwhudson | pitti: is there a process for ignoring an autopkgtest failure for proposed migration? i synced openafs and it failed autopkgtest because of a kernel headers bug | 08:32 |
| pitti | mwhudson: kmods not building on amd64 is a known issue, kernel team is working on it (amd64 gcc now enables -fPIE by default which kernel modules stumble upon) | 08:33 |
| pitti | mwhudson: I regularly wave through these packages | 08:33 |
| pitti | mwhudson: the s390x regression is something else, though | 08:34 |
| mwhudson | oh i didn't even look at that | 08:34 |
| mwhudson | pitti: thanks for the yakkety / adt-run tip btw | 08:35 |
| pitti | mwhudson: no worries; this hit me by surprise too | 08:35 |
| pitti | was fairly hard to debug actually | 08:35 |
| pitti | mwhudson: might just be a flaky test of course (most likely), I'll retry | 08:37 |
| mwhudson | pitti: ok, if not i'll point the debian maintainer at it, he seems responsive at least | 08:38 |
| pitti | mwhudson: requeued, but test infra is still KDE-DoSed, so will take a while (http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running.shtml) | 08:38 |
| mwhudson | pitti: yes, just saw that :-) | 08:39 |
| mwhudson | will see what's happened in the morning i guess | 08:39 |
| mwhudson | pitti: while you're here <wink> is there a simple way to configure one's adt-virt-qemu images to use an apt proxy? | 08:42 |
| pitti | mwhudson: which one are you using? | 08:42 |
| pitti | mwhudson: it has auto-detected and used apt-cacher-ng for ages | 08:42 |
| mwhudson | oh, adt-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud -p | 08:42 |
| mwhudson | pitti: i'm using squid-deb-proxy | 08:42 |
| pitti | mwhudson: and in 3.20.6 I generalized stuff to pick up any kind of proxy | 08:42 |
| pitti | mwhudson: so, -p or wait for .6 so that it should Just Work⢠| 08:42 |
| mwhudson | pitti: ah nice | 08:42 |
| mwhudson | pitti: will i need to rebuild images in 3.20.6? | 08:43 |
| pitti | mwhudson: same with adt-build-lx{c,d} | 08:43 |
| pitti | mwhudson: no, only if you want to change the proxy | 08:43 |
| mwhudson | ok | 08:43 |
| mwhudson | nice | 08:43 |
| mwhudson | now i just need a cloud-images.u.c mirror near me :-) | 08:43 |
| pitti | mwhudson: the workaround for the python entropy thing is on the adt-virt-qemu side, not in images | 08:44 |
| === meetingology` is now known as meetingology | ||
| === xnox_ is now known as xnox | ||
| === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === tai271828_ is now known as tai271828 | ||
| === \b is now known as benonsoftware | ||
| === dobey_ is now known as dobey | ||
| === la_juyis` is now known as la_juyis | ||
| ibrahim | i want to know how did the SoftwareCenter issue passed all of the tests and Quality check?! | 15:35 |
| ibrahim_ | although it is now fixed but it had to be spotted while doing any regular checks ! | 15:39 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| ibrahim_ | how did the Software centre bug pass the QA regular check? | 15:52 |
| ibrahim_ | how did the Software centre bug pass the QA regular check? | 15:57 |
| === nuclearbob is now known as nuclearbob_afk | ||
| ibrahim_ | how did the Software centre bug pass the QA regular check? | 17:17 |
| === jhodapp_ is now known as jhodapp | ||
| dobey | !patience | ibrahim_ | 18:27 |
| ubot5 | ibrahim_: Don't feel ignored and repeat your question quickly; if nobody knows your answer, nobody will answer you. While you wait, try searching https://help.ubuntu.com or http://ubuntuforums.org or http://askubuntu.com/ | 18:27 |
| ibrahim_ | isn't this the official IRC of ubuntu QA ?? if the guys arent checking the isos before launching it so what are they doing!!?? sorry if i was rude but were are the devels ?? btw sorry for repeating the question | 18:30 |
| flocculant | ibrahim_: what bug exactly? | 18:32 |
| gQuigs | ibrahim_: I don't even know what Software center bug you are refferigng to | 18:32 |
| gQuigs | :P | 18:32 |
| flocculant | :) | 18:32 |
| flocculant | ibrahim_: also - this isn't just the Ubuntu QA channel - flavours use it as well | 18:33 |
| ibrahim_ | istalling third party apps didnt work but its now fixed | 18:33 |
| ibrahim_ | *installing | 18:33 |
| flocculant | ibrahim_: afaik there are 2 types of testing - autotesting and real people doing things | 18:34 |
| gQuigs | ibrahim_: you mean snappy apps or something else? | 18:34 |
| gQuigs | or just debs? | 18:34 |
| flocculant | I reported some stuff from really using it - some got fixed prior to release, some marked as invalid - it dropped in late in the cycle | 18:34 |
| ibrahim_ | no its just .deb apps | 18:34 |
| flocculant | gQuigs: there were things like Chrome failing | 18:35 |
| ibrahim_ | it's now fixed but why did they release the distro with such a bug?? | 18:35 |
| flocculant | ibrahim_: not seen properly perhaps? | 18:35 |
| gQuigs | ibrahim_: I'd check the ISO Testing TestCases | 18:35 |
| gQuigs | I'm guessing installing from a .deb isn't on the test list | 18:36 |
| flocculant | gQuigs: I'd be mightily surprised to see anything like that on an ISO testcase | 18:36 |
| ibrahim_ | gQuigs_: Ok! | 18:36 |
| flocculant | and frankly wouldn't want to see it on there | 18:37 |
| flocculant | unless it was a 'Check installed apps' thing | 18:37 |
| gQuigs | they have an ISO base on and then an extended desktop test | 18:38 |
| flocculant | ibrahim_: I *do* know that the devs where responsive to pings about the software bugs - I contacted people on numerous occasions about things with my Xubuntu hat on | 18:38 |
| gQuigs | the desktop test should have it I think | 18:38 |
| flocculant | gQuigs: possibly - I only look at Ubuntu tests to check that a bug is *globalbuntu* | 18:38 |
| flocculant | so I can tell Xubuntu people it's not us ;) | 18:39 |
| ibrahim_ | btw it was confirmed in xubuntu software cenetre too -_- | 18:39 |
| flocculant | ibrahim_: probably | 18:40 |
| ibrahim_ | bcz its the same as ubuntu | 18:40 |
| flocculant | ibrahim_: but we STILL have no idea what bug you're talking about ::) | 18:40 |
| ibrahim_ | hold on while i bring the link | 18:40 |
| ibrahim_ | http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2016/04/ubuntu-16-04-deb-software-install-error | 18:42 |
| ibrahim_ | here you go | 18:42 |
| flocculant | thought so | 18:43 |
| flocculant | anyway - I have no idea why it was released like that - luckily I'm just a volunteer on a community flavour :p | 18:43 |
| mwhudson | pitti: uh, did the openafs test re-run on s390x? i can't tell | 21:26 |
| === nuclearbob is now known as nuclearbob_afk | ||
| === zequence_ is now known as zequence | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!