[01:37] adt-run ... --- qemu ~/adt-yakkety-amd64-cloud.img doesn't work for me at the moment [01:38] does it for everyone else? i made the image with adt-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud -r yakkety just now [01:38] failure is like this: http://paste.ubuntu.com/16484207/ === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === JoseeAntonioR is now known as jose === vtapia_ is now known as vtapia === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [08:32] pitti: is there a process for ignoring an autopkgtest failure for proposed migration? i synced openafs and it failed autopkgtest because of a kernel headers bug [08:33] mwhudson: kmods not building on amd64 is a known issue, kernel team is working on it (amd64 gcc now enables -fPIE by default which kernel modules stumble upon) [08:33] mwhudson: I regularly wave through these packages [08:34] mwhudson: the s390x regression is something else, though [08:34] oh i didn't even look at that [08:35] pitti: thanks for the yakkety / adt-run tip btw [08:35] mwhudson: no worries; this hit me by surprise too [08:35] was fairly hard to debug actually [08:37] mwhudson: might just be a flaky test of course (most likely), I'll retry [08:38] pitti: ok, if not i'll point the debian maintainer at it, he seems responsive at least [08:38] mwhudson: requeued, but test infra is still KDE-DoSed, so will take a while (http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running.shtml) [08:39] pitti: yes, just saw that :-) [08:39] will see what's happened in the morning i guess [08:42] pitti: while you're here is there a simple way to configure one's adt-virt-qemu images to use an apt proxy? [08:42] mwhudson: which one are you using? [08:42] mwhudson: it has auto-detected and used apt-cacher-ng for ages [08:42] oh, adt-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud -p [08:42] pitti: i'm using squid-deb-proxy [08:42] mwhudson: and in 3.20.6 I generalized stuff to pick up any kind of proxy [08:42] mwhudson: so, -p or wait for .6 so that it should Just Work™ [08:42] pitti: ah nice [08:43] pitti: will i need to rebuild images in 3.20.6? [08:43] mwhudson: same with adt-build-lx{c,d} [08:43] mwhudson: no, only if you want to change the proxy [08:43] ok [08:43] nice [08:43] now i just need a cloud-images.u.c mirror near me :-) [08:44] mwhudson: the workaround for the python entropy thing is on the adt-virt-qemu side, not in images === meetingology` is now known as meetingology === xnox_ is now known as xnox === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha === tai271828_ is now known as tai271828 === \b is now known as benonsoftware === dobey_ is now known as dobey === la_juyis` is now known as la_juyis [15:35] i want to know how did the SoftwareCenter issue passed all of the tests and Quality check?! [15:39] although it is now fixed but it had to be spotted while doing any regular checks ! === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [15:52] how did the Software centre bug pass the QA regular check? [15:57] how did the Software centre bug pass the QA regular check? === nuclearbob is now known as nuclearbob_afk [17:17] how did the Software centre bug pass the QA regular check? === jhodapp_ is now known as jhodapp [18:27] !patience | ibrahim_ [18:27] ibrahim_: Don't feel ignored and repeat your question quickly; if nobody knows your answer, nobody will answer you. While you wait, try searching https://help.ubuntu.com or http://ubuntuforums.org or http://askubuntu.com/ [18:30] isn't this the official IRC of ubuntu QA ?? if the guys arent checking the isos before launching it so what are they doing!!?? sorry if i was rude but were are the devels ?? btw sorry for repeating the question [18:32] ibrahim_: what bug exactly? [18:32] ibrahim_: I don't even know what Software center bug you are refferigng to [18:32] :P [18:32] :) [18:33] ibrahim_: also - this isn't just the Ubuntu QA channel - flavours use it as well [18:33] istalling third party apps didnt work but its now fixed [18:33] *installing [18:34] ibrahim_: afaik there are 2 types of testing - autotesting and real people doing things [18:34] ibrahim_: you mean snappy apps or something else? [18:34] or just debs? [18:34] I reported some stuff from really using it - some got fixed prior to release, some marked as invalid - it dropped in late in the cycle [18:34] no its just .deb apps [18:35] gQuigs: there were things like Chrome failing [18:35] it's now fixed but why did they release the distro with such a bug?? [18:35] ibrahim_: not seen properly perhaps? [18:35] ibrahim_: I'd check the ISO Testing TestCases [18:36] I'm guessing installing from a .deb isn't on the test list [18:36] gQuigs: I'd be mightily surprised to see anything like that on an ISO testcase [18:36] gQuigs_: Ok! [18:37] and frankly wouldn't want to see it on there [18:37] unless it was a 'Check installed apps' thing [18:38] they have an ISO base on and then an extended desktop test [18:38] ibrahim_: I *do* know that the devs where responsive to pings about the software bugs - I contacted people on numerous occasions about things with my Xubuntu hat on [18:38] the desktop test should have it I think [18:38] gQuigs: possibly - I only look at Ubuntu tests to check that a bug is *globalbuntu* [18:39] so I can tell Xubuntu people it's not us ;) [18:39] btw it was confirmed in xubuntu software cenetre too -_- [18:40] ibrahim_: probably [18:40] bcz its the same as ubuntu [18:40] ibrahim_: but we STILL have no idea what bug you're talking about ::) [18:40] hold on while i bring the link [18:42] http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2016/04/ubuntu-16-04-deb-software-install-error [18:42] here you go [18:43] thought so [18:43] anyway - I have no idea why it was released like that - luckily I'm just a volunteer on a community flavour :p [21:26] pitti: uh, did the openafs test re-run on s390x? i can't tell === nuclearbob is now known as nuclearbob_afk === zequence_ is now known as zequence