/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/05/20/#ubuntu-ci-eng.txt

Trevinhorobru: hey, do you have any clue why this is back: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1419?00:25
TrevinhoI think britney thinking that unity is not building in s390x, where it never got built ever00:25
Trevinhobut, in xenial this thing was ignored00:25
robruTrevinho: i guess the hints need to be updated. Poke pitti about that, for now just tell qa to override it and put it in the queue anyway00:27
Trevinhorobru: do you know who is in charge right now?00:28
robruTrevinho: for qa? I usually see ToyKeeper at this time, not sure officially though00:35
robruTrevinho: i think of you ping "ubuntu-qa" it gets them all00:36
Trevinhorobru: ok, as we don't generally need the QA ACK, so I just need someone who can push the "publish" button.00:36
robruTrevinho: oh right, sorry.00:36
ToyKeeperIf it needs QA but the automated signoff can't pass for bogus reasons, I can get it into the QA queue.  But it sounds like that's irrelevant?00:36
robruTrevinho: you should be able to publish yourself if there's no packaging changes00:37
robruToyKeeper: sorry, yakkety only landing00:37
Trevinholet me check00:37
Trevinhowell there are some pkg changes00:38
Trevinhoeh, no... not allowed00:39
TrevinhoI need some ubuntu dev00:39
robruTrevinho: sorry, i can't do it. My go-to guys are EOD by now. Try looking at ubuntu-core-dev for timezone appropriate people, or wait a few hours for sil2100 to wake up00:51
Trevinhorobru: yeah, no worries... We can wait till tomorrow morning00:51
SaviqMirv, hey, any idea why mir 0.22 would still be unavailable in yakkety-proposed https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mir/ ?06:26
Saviqabeato, for whatever reason mir 0.22 isn't published in proposed yet06:33
Saviq↑↑06:33
abeatoSaviq, noted, thanks06:33
abeatoMirv, we need that to build aethercast too see error ^^06:34
abeato(that = mir 0.22)06:34
Saviqah Mirv is away, forgot, we'll need to wait for sil210006:44
Mirv Saviq hmm07:05
MirvSaviq: I'm away?07:05
SaviqMirv, aren't you? :D07:06
MirvSaviq: no, why would I be? :D I will be in two weeks though07:06
SaviqMirv, yeah I saw that in the calendar and didn't pay attention to dates ;)07:06
MirvSaviq: isn't that " 0.22.1+16.04.20160516.2-0ubuntu2 " "proposed (main)" what you asked?07:07
SaviqMirv, sure, except:07:07
Saviq# apt-cache policy libmirclient907:07
Saviqlibmirclient9:07:07
Saviq  Installed: (none)07:07
Saviq  Candidate: 0.21.0+16.04.20160330-0ubuntu307:07
Saviq  Version table:07:07
Saviq     0.21.0+16.04.20160330-0ubuntu3 50007:07
Saviq        500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu yakkety/main amd64 Packages07:07
Saviqand yes I have proposed enabled07:07
MirvSaviq: but, regardless, it's not in release pocket, and it's not "really" in proposed pocket either since it has new binaries that are in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/yakkety/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=mir07:08
MirvSaviq: so yes it's in proposed but it's not in proposed07:08
Mirv(source is, binaries aren't)07:08
SaviqMirv, right, that sounds about right07:08
MirvSaviq: abeato: so you need to ping your friendliest member of https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+members07:08
* Saviq → #ubuntu-devel07:09
* abeato follows07:10
Saviqthis is going to be nasty, mir will need an archive admin for basically every release...07:11
MirvSaviq: incorrect actually07:13
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
MirvSaviq: or it will, but by trainguard. I mean, train bypasses binary new queue07:14
Saviqah07:14
Saviqright07:14
Mirvso it's manual requirement that the publisher needs to consults archive admin, and it has always been so07:14
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
Mirvwhich is boring regardless of which way archive admins need to be troubled with it07:15
Mirvbut needs to be done as long as mir continues to break its stuff instead of being stable ;)07:15
Mirv1.0!07:15
Saviqgaaah how long's it gonna take mir to get published in proposd after being binNEWed?07:56
* Saviq got tricked into trio-ifying silo 58 ;(07:57
Saviqit'll be fine, they said07:57
Saviqit's best like that, they said07:57
Saviqbollocks08:01
=== salem_ is now known as _salem
Saviqabeato, you can rebuild, mir got published08:52
abeatoSaviq, already did, thanks :)08:53
abeatoseems to be building just fine08:53
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
Saviqrvr, jibel, https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1381 is good to go... again..., any chance of putting it back on the top of the queue?10:20
rvrSaviq: Sure10:20
Ads20000Uh, I don't really know how CI Train works, but it's failed to build unity8 for the Stable Phone Overlay PPA which is a bit of a problem since I use that (though I haven't loaded unity8 successfully yet anyway). I'm guessing someone's on it (but it's not in known issues)?10:40
SaviqAds20000, why do you say that? https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/stable-phone-overlay/+packages?field.name_filter=unity8&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=10:44
Saviqit's only "failed" for architectures we don't support (yet) because of missing dependencies10:44
* ogra_ wonders what he means by "since i use that" ... 10:44
SaviqI suppose the overlay10:45
ogra_there are thousands of phones out there using it too :) ... (but definitely not as deb packages)10:45
Ads20000Sorry, I meant that I use the PPA on my desktop, but I haven't actually used Unity 8 yet because I couldn't log into it (though I also couldn't report a bug on it because 1 package wasn't installing (can't remember what it was))10:45
ogra_urgh10:45
ogra_dont do that10:46
Ads20000Don't do what, run the PPA? Didn't help that OMG Ubuntu recommended it, maybe I could ask him to edit the article?10:46
ogra_many of these packages are solely designed for working in image based upgrades ...10:46
Ads20000I'm confused, they're DEBs right? For using on a standard APT system?10:47
ogra_there wont be config transitions etc ... and there will be things they expect tht you dont have on a PC ... just use xenial or yakkety and the unity8 from the archive10:47
Ads20000If I may ask, what's the PPA actually for then?10:48
ogra_Ads20000, they are debs designed to be used in context of image based updates10:48
ogra_images and their deltas are built from them10:48
* Mirv haz Meizu Pro 510:48
ogra_they are usually not installed directly unless someone develops on a specific package10:48
* Mirv loves it, it's awesome, really10:48
* ogra_ throws envious looks at Mirv ... mine is on the truck ... still waiting 10:49
Ads20000Hmm, ogra_ could you get someone to edit the PPA description then to tell normal users not to add it? :P10:49
MirvI moved my /home/phablet over from Bq already too10:49
Mirvcamera and hotspot didn't work at first but then I noticed my first visit to System Settings hadn't told me that there's a system upgrade. both worked after that.10:49
Ads20000But OK, I suppose that makes sense, cheers, will ppa-purge now :)10:49
ogra_Ads20000, i dont know who owns it ... perhaps sil2100 can10:50
Mirvalso, default was 2G network, but now I've 4G and currently ~20Mbit/s :)10:50
ogra_crazy talk !10:50
Ads20000Also, ogra_, I'm guessing the unity8 package in Xenial/Yakkety will be more out-of-date but you're saying that's OK? I can still file bugs against it?10:52
ogra_xenial -> a little since it must be SRUed ... yakkety is on the same version as the PPA usually10:52
ogra_everything landing lands in all thee10:52
Saviq... since yesterday ...10:53
ogra_heh, yeah10:53
Saviqso this is why overlay was really needed on xenial even to get the latest and greatest10:53
Saviqbut yeah, starting today yakkety should be on par10:53
Ads20000OK cool sounds good :)10:55
Ads20000Thanks for the help :)10:55
ogra_np :)10:55
jin_jibel: ping10:56
jin_jibel: Hello, there is a request from Telegram: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/144110:56
jin_jibel: need your approval on pushing this into the dashboard you have :)10:57
sil2100What's up?10:58
ogra_sil2100, Ads20000 asked if you can change the overlay PPA description to tell people oit is not for general use10:59
jin_davmor2: hey buddy10:59
ogra_he enabled it on the PC to test unity810:59
jin_davmor2: need your team's support on this version:10:59
jin_https://drive.google.com/open?id=1y8XmPqIv-0rkp8bTXYT5Lo_8jhrdF2X2mcsymTENnjY10:59
jin_davmor2: oh sorry, this one is the correct one:11:00
jin_https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/144111:00
jin_davmor2: the ticket #1441 for Telegram11:00
jin_:)11:00
davmor2jin_: hey dude nice okay I'll keep an eye out for it.11:00
sil2100Ads20000, ogra_: ok, let me change the description, but I thought the name itself was obvious enough ;) It's the Stable PHONE Overlay, not desktop ;)11:01
jin_davmor2: awesome!11:01
ogra_haha, yeah11:01
Ads20000sil2100: I think the problem was that it seemed like one could use the PPA for getting the stable phone packages onto the desktop and it's implied that the existence of the PPA means that Xenial/Yakkety package aren't up-do-date enough11:03
Ads20000but a description change would fix that impression :)11:03
=== jin_ is now known as jin-away
rvrabeato: Hi11:20
rvrabeato: Would it be possible to merge silos 29 and 5?11:21
abeatorvr, not really, one of them is not a dual(trio) landing11:21
rvrAh, I see11:21
Ads20000Oh, Saviq, I've only just realised what you were saying. I can't install unity8 from the PPA because it depends on unity8-common which depends on unity-scopes-impl-12 which isn't in the PPA or in Yakkety11:25
SaviqAds20000, oh you're using yakkety?11:26
Ads20000Yes, is that an issue?11:28
Ads20000(Saviq)11:28
SaviqAds20000, no, there's just no yakkety packages in the overlay PPA at all, there's a big queue of packages in proposed that will make yakkety work for you again11:28
SaviqAds20000, unity-plugin-scopes provides unity-scopes-impl-12 (it's virtual) - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scopes-shell11:29
SaviqAds20000, we're in a bit of a transition period right now, you'd either need to enable proposed on your machine or wait a day or two for us to resolve all this11:29
Ads20000Saviq I have yakkety-proposed enabled11:30
SaviqAds20000, as you can see it's waiting to build https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scopes-shell/0.5.7+16.04.20160505-0ubuntu211:31
SaviqAds20000, so as said, we're in a bit of a transition - we're working on it - give it a day please :)11:32
Ads20000Saviq, OK that's fine, I don't understand as much as I thought about how this all works! ogra_ suggested that it's best just to use the packages in the Yakkety repo though, would you agree? :)11:33
rvrkdub: Hi. We need more info about silo 69. Can you include the changelog in the description? This is a good example: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/142011:33
kdubrvr, sure11:34
SaviqAds20000, yes, but just give us a day as we complete the transition :)11:34
Ads20000OK cool, cheers :)11:36
kdubrvr, done11:36
rvrkdub: Great, thanks11:36
sil2100No-change rebuilds for the win :|11:37
sil2100Saviq: do you know if pstolowski or anyone else is on the yakkety unity-scopes-api failure?11:37
Saviqsil2100, just pung them11:38
sil2100Saviq: big thanks!11:38
rvrbzoltan: ping11:53
bzoltanrvr:  hello there, what can I do for you?11:54
rvrbzoltan: I'm checking https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/158233911:54
ubot5Launchpad bug 1582339 in ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) "Selected section has no color" [High,In progress]11:54
bzoltanrvr:  and?11:54
rvrbzoltan: Not a big issue. But cannot reproduce in stable or rc-proposed11:54
rvrI see that the section is correctly colored11:54
bzoltanrvr:  because that bug was introduced by our staging branch11:55
rvrAh11:55
rvrSo never hit the images ?11:55
t1mprvr: no, only in our staging11:56
rvrt1mp: Cool. Mistery solved :)11:56
bzoltanrvr: as t1mp said... we introduced a regression :) but we have fixed it before it could land.11:57
rvrbzoltan: Understood11:58
kdubrvr, with silo 69, i had to rebuild a package (not a content change, but still had to rebuild) not sure if that card has to go back to square zero or not :/12:05
rvrkdub: No problem, I will remove the new card12:05
rvrEverytime a silo is rebuilt, a new card appears12:05
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
rvrThe prioritization in trello is manual12:06
kdubrvr, thanks12:06
ChrisTownsendtrainguards: Hi!  Are britney runs known to be taking a very loooong time right now?  I did a rebuild yesteday due to the triple landings and the britney run is still going: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/142512:24
kdubChrisTownsend, I noted that they were taking longer than normal yesterday as well12:28
ChrisTownsendkdub: Ok, good to know I'm not the only one.  But my run has been going on for almost 14 hours or so.12:29
MirvChrisTownsend: I'm not 100% sure. there has been a huge queue for yakkety http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running.shtml but I don't see yours there, plus the ppc64el libertine at https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/xenial/landing-031/excuses.html seems suspicious too. our only option if somethings gets truly stuck is to ping pitti on #ubuntu-devel12:29
kdubChrisTownsend, yeah, it took most of the day to sign off on my silo12:29
ChrisTownsendMirv: Ok, I'll follow up w/ pitti.  Thanks12:30
ChrisTownsendkdub: ok12:30
Mirvsil2100: jibel: I upgraded my turbo to rc-proposed, now SIM unlock does not prompt when booting the phone, I need to select it from menu. sounds familiar, and under which such a bug should be filed?12:43
jibelMirv, you mean there is no SIM unlock prompt or it doesn't show up when you press the unlock SIM button in the indicator12:50
jibel?12:50
jibelthere is a bug for both IIRC12:50
jibeldavmor2, ^ do you know?12:51
pstolowskisil2100, hey, since apparently we should do triple landings now, can enable & build for yakety in silo 47 without starting from scratch?12:51
davmor2Mirv: there is a bug for it I think don't know if it is specific to turbo let me have a dig12:52
davmor2Mirv: meh I can't put my hand on it right now I'll dig it out later12:55
Mirvjibel: there's no SIM unlock prompt during bootup, but there is if I press the button from indicator12:57
Mirvdavmor2: ok, that's a regression from the OTA-10.2 my turbo booted with before upgrading12:57
jibelMirv, I'm pretty sure I saw a bug report but cannot find it12:58
davmor2jibel: yeah there is but I can't find it either, I'm not sure if it is device specific so filed there or against ofono/system-settings/network indicator12:59
Saviqsil2100, can you please recycle the regression here https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/vivid/landing-058/excuses.html thanks13:01
rvrtsdgeos: ping13:01
Saviqmterry, oh you're here now, too, can you recycle ↑ please13:02
* mterry dusts off his recycling fingers13:02
mterrydone13:03
tsdgeosrvr: hi13:03
rvrtsdgeos: Hi13:04
rvrtsdgeos: I'm testing #142129313:04
rvrtsdgeos: Can you tell me whether this is right? https://trello-attachments.s3.amazonaws.com/53fc6641728df958a48bfbe1/573c2103599129a715a9863d/322d159220c9ee3f8f9f0d87eb507142/screenshot20160520_140023336.png13:05
rvrtsdgeos: Well, that's an screenshot with arale13:06
tsdgeosrvr: not sure what i'm looking at :D13:06
rvrtsdgeos: I'm trying to understand what you did :D https://launchpadlibrarian.net/197431959/icon.png13:06
tsdgeosrvr: it's with 25px and 50px as grid unity13:07
tsdgeos-y13:07
tsdgeosbut i am not sure the bug was actually fixed13:07
tsdgeosltinkl: ping13:07
tsdgeosltinkl: do you remember the branch https://code.launchpad.net/~lukas-kde/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/staging-fix-icon-svg-image-loading ? it was marked as fixing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1421293 but i remember some discussion about it not really fixing the bug?13:08
ubot5Launchpad bug 1421293 in ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) "Icon width is inconsistent when height is specified" [Low,Fix released]13:08
ltinkltsdgeos, it should be fixed13:11
ltinkltsdgeos, I used your testcase13:11
Mirvjibel: davmor2: sil2100: I couldn't find a bug, so I filed bug #1584049 (not sure to which package it would suite best)13:11
ubot5bug 1584049 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "[regression OTA-10 -> rc-proposed] SIM unlocking not offered on boot, need to select from indicator" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/158404913:11
davmor2Mirv: I thought this was going to be your stable phone so why take it off stable????13:14
tsdgeosrvr: ltinkl: ok let me try to remember what this was about :D13:15
Mirvdavmor2: because I have strong belief that OTA-11 is near ready :) I already changed the channel back to stable to stay on this particular image until OTA-11 is ready13:15
Mirvdavmor2: and because OTA-10 had the Mir performance bug(s)13:15
davmor2Mirv: so you lied then ;)13:15
rvrtsdgeos: lol, ok13:15
Mirvdavmor2: if I said something about staying on stable channel yes I lied :) too tempting...13:16
davmor2Mirv: you didn't say stable channel you said this is my new stable phone so I can use krillin for testing :D13:17
* ogra_ finds it funny that the "gold" actually doesnt look so "gold" ... it is more somewhere between champagne and copper i think13:19
Mirvogra_: indeed, which is a good thing. bzoltan and zsombi didn't order it since they tought it's too gold, but it's actually quite mute and mostly gray with some tints as you mentioned13:20
ogra_yeah13:20
tsdgeosrvr: yeah the bug is not fixed13:23
rvrtsdgeos: :-(13:24
tsdgeosrvr: the bug is basically that the first image looks "correct" at any GRID_UNIT_PX value13:24
tsdgeoswhile the second does not13:24
tsdgeosyou need to add extra code (i.e. the third) for it to look correct13:24
Mirvdavmor2: I will use the krillin to test any offered fix for that bug :)13:25
Mirvmy turbo is back to ro mode after editing the channel.ini back to stable13:25
tsdgeosrvr: this is with different GRID_UNIT_PX for me http://i.imgur.com/EBb8PEU.png13:26
davmor2Mirv: why edit channel.ini all you had to do was system-image-cli --switch <channel_url>13:26
rvrtsdgeos: So fixed, it should like the third window, right?13:26
tsdgeosrvr: the second image should look like the third in all GRID_UNIT_PX13:27
tsdgeosand not only in the right one13:27
rvrtsdgeos: Ack13:27
tsdgeost1mp: i edited the bug, hope it's easier to understand now13:28
rvrbzoltan: So, bug #1421293 is not fixed13:29
ubot5bug 1421293 in ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) "Icon width is inconsistent when height is specified" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/142129313:29
jhodappsil2100, ping13:31
Mirvdavmor2: I didn't remember that one and this one also easy, one line change, back to ro mode, check for updates in system settings13:32
dobeygo go gadget mir already13:38
Saviqsil2100, jibel, https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1442 - this can probably skip QA and will unblock some things in yakkety13:39
dobeySaviq: how will that unblock things?13:42
Saviqdobey, there's things waiting to build in proposed because of it FTBFSing13:42
Saviqhttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scopes-api/1.0.5+16.04.20160413.1-0ubuntu213:42
dobeythe big thing still seems to be mir13:45
Saviqseb128, since I excluded you earlier today, can I ask you to ♻ https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/vivid/landing-058/excuses.html13:45
Saviqdobey, mir's in proposed already13:45
dobeySaviq: yes, but lots of things seem to be uninstallable13:46
seb128Saviq, done13:47
Saviqseb128, thanks13:47
Saviqdobey, yeah, and part of everything being uninstallable was unity-scopes-api not building13:47
Saviqnow it will so we'll just get one small step further13:47
bzoltant1mp: or better here13:48
t1mpah, right13:48
bzoltant1mp:  yes rvr I mean13:48
t1mprvr, tsdgeos: is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1421293 not fixed?13:50
ubot5Launchpad bug 1421293 in ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) "Icon width is inconsistent when height is specified" [Low,Triaged]13:50
t1mpI reviewed a branch with a test case that fixed it, let me see13:50
t1mpwell the two attached branches are the same, just different merge target13:50
tsdgeost1mp: i think you may have not understood what the bug was about13:51
t1mpit adds a test case in tst_icons that passes, and visual inspection showed the correct results too13:51
tsdgeossince the bug is not against svg13:51
tsdgeosand the branches where for svg improvements13:51
tsdgeosas far as i remember13:51
t1mphmm, right, the branch name mentions svg13:52
t1mpbut the test case is for png, and I checked that13:52
t1mpI didn't think of svg13:52
t1mphmm13:52
ChrisTownsendubuntu-qa: Hi!  Could we keep the current place on the queue for https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1425 since I had to rebuild for the triple landing?13:52
t1mpfrom the bug report: "For the SVG the width grows as the units.gu grow, but for the JPEG it does not and one has to manually add code to maitain the aspect ratio."13:52
tsdgeost1mp: see the updated description13:53
t1mpso, the test verifies that the aspect ration is maintained, right?13:53
tsdgeosyes, i'm not complaining about sVG doing the right thing13:53
tsdgeosi'm complaining JPEG/PNG doesn't13:53
tsdgeost1mp: which test?13:53
t1mpsee l. 227 on https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sdk-team/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/trunk-fix-icon-svg-image-loading/+merge/28658513:53
t1mpand the test function directly under it13:54
davmor2ChrisTownsend: yeah don't worry we are just deleting new tickets if they are dupes13:54
ChrisTownsenddavmor2: Ok, cool, thanks13:54
Mirvogra_: can you play back videos you take with camera? for me it says it can't and also all thumbnails are just placeholder image (both videos I took with Bq and new ones)13:54
ogra_havent tried13:55
tsdgeost1mp: that test is broken, needs to be testing for different grid units too13:55
tsdgeosincidentally on the default gu value on the desktop it works13:55
tsdgeosi've no idea why13:55
Mirvit might be this  .cache/gstreamer-1.0/registry.arm.bin problem I read somewhere about13:57
t1mptsdgeos: http://i.imgur.com/EBb8PEU.png indeed looks wrong13:58
ogra_Mirv, works fine13:58
jibelChrisTownsend, sure13:58
t1mptsdgeos: okay, so then the bug is not fixed13:58
bzoltanrvr: did I miss something?13:58
tsdgeost1mp: yeah :/13:58
t1mpltinkl: will you take the bug again?13:58
rvrbzoltan: tsdgeos confirms that the bug is not fixed13:58
Mirvogra_: ok, good. I think it's something they've struggled with after OTA-1013:58
t1mpbzoltan: it appears that the bug was only fixed for the specific GU setting that was used for testing..13:59
bzoltanrvr:  would you please not fail the silo yet?13:59
tsdgeosrvr: yeah failing the silo for that makes no sense13:59
rvrbzoltan: I tested everything else and is good13:59
t1mprvr, bzoltan: that bug is only low priority, we thought it was nice that is was fixed as a side-effect of other fixes, but I don't think we need to fail a silo for that. Just remove the bug13:59
ogra_Mirv, well, i'm on 10.213:59
jibelSaviq, +1 to skip QA13:59
tsdgeosrvr: i mean the branch was not fixing that really, was fixing something else and i guess my bad description of the bug made people think it was actually fixed13:59
bzoltanrvr: let's keep the bug open and pass the silo13:59
jibelSaviq, (for silo 39)14:00
Saviqyup14:00
rvrtsdgeos: But if the test is wrong, and the code doesn't fix the problem...14:01
rvrRemove the branch14:01
bzoltanrvr: it is not a branch14:01
tsdgeosrvr: the code does fix the problem14:01
tsdgeosjust not *this* problem14:01
tsdgeosit fixes the problem it wanted to fix14:01
rvrHmm14:01
t1mprvr: the branch fixed another, critical, bug. But it did not fix this low-priority bug that we thought it also fixed as a side-effect14:01
rvrI see14:02
rvrOk, then remove the bug from the list and I'll aprove it14:02
bzoltanrvr:  and regardless of anything... the silo does not bring regression and it does fix OTA bugs... + the issue in hand does fix one case... multiply MRs can fix the same bug.14:02
bzoltanrvr: but that MR does fix one case of that bug... the way to handle it is to reopen the bug. Would not be the first case that the same bug is fixed multply time.14:03
bzoltanrvr: tsdgeos: t1mp: There is no "Fixes partially LP: #123456" syntax ... so fixing a corner case requires the same syntax in the changelogs14:04
ubot5Launchpad bug 123456 in xine-lib (Ubuntu) "podcast crashes amarok" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/12345614:04
bzoltangood job ubot514:04
rvrlol14:04
davmor2Mirv: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8/+bug/158394414:05
ubot5Launchpad bug 1583944 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "It's possible to swipe the SIM PIN dialog away" [Medium,In progress]14:05
t1mpbzoltan: it does not properly fix this bug, so we can remove that line from the changelog and keep the bug open14:05
oSoMoNrvr, all merge requests approved for https://trello.com/c/b1JNG7NQ/3239-1387-ubuntu-landing-053-webbrowser-app-osomon14:05
rvroSoMoN: Thanks14:05
rvrbzoltan: Approved14:05
bzoltanrvr: thanks14:05
t1mpltinkl: do you want to take another shot at fixing that bug?14:06
bzoltant1mp: let's let the CI machine now mark that bug and reopen... I do not remove changelog entry from the changelog without removing the code what it refers to14:06
t1mpokay14:07
bzoltant1mp: pushing a new rev of the landing branch would hold back like 24 hours14:07
ltinklt1mp, not really, if I don't have to :p14:07
t1mpltinkl: who decides whether you have to? ;)14:07
t1mpok, I'll keep it as unassigned for now then.14:07
rvrChrisTownsend: Hi!14:12
ChrisTownsendrvr: Hey!14:12
rvrChrisTownsend: Can you add the changelog to the libertine silo description? Like this one: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/142014:13
ChrisTownsendrvr: Sure!  Is that something I should every time from now on?14:13
rvrChrisTownsend: Yes, please. It is easier for us.14:14
ChrisTownsendrvr: Sure, no problem.14:14
ChrisTownsendrvr: Ok, updated the ticket.14:17
ChrisTownsendrvr: Let me know if that is what you are looking for.14:17
rvrChrisTownsend: Yeah, that's fine. Thanks!14:18
ChrisTownsendrvr: Ok, cool14:18
=== _salem is now known as salem_
oSoMoNsil2100, Mirv: can one of you guys please publish silo 53 on my behalf? it’s got packaging changes (which were approved by kenvandine)15:18
sil2100oSoMoN: looking!15:25
sil2100oSoMoN: done!15:27
oSoMoNsil2100, thanks!15:29
oSoMoNdavmor2, I see that you moved the trello card for silo 53 to under testing, you can skip that and move it to passed, as it was validated by jibel earlier this morning and it is currently being published15:33
jibeldavmor2, it's done15:33
davmor2jibel: shocking ;)15:34
davmor2oSoMoN: I did stumble across something fun in that silo, on frieza if you open system-indicator select desktop mode, then open the browser if you highlight one of the link scroll up and down the page it then triggers the mouse over dialogue at the bottom of the page with the url link in it :)15:36
oSoMoNdavmor2, isn’t that the expected behaviour? if the mouse cursor is over a hyperlink, its target URL will be displayed in the overlay15:38
davmor2oSoMoN: there is no mouse cursor long press on a link and then hit cancel, then scroll up and down, ie long press the shop link, cancel that dialogue, then scroll up and down and you get the mouse hover dialogue15:39
oSoMoNdavmor2, ah, got it! I guess this is still considered as a mouseover event by the web engine15:41
oSoMoNeven though there is no actual cursor visible on screen15:41
davmor2oSoMoN: that's my assumption but it only happen after the scroll which was the thing that threw me :)15:42
oSoMoNdavmor2, not sure that would qualify as a bug, more like a "weird behaviour", but feel free to file a bug against webbrowser-app anyway15:42
davmor2oSoMoN: I have no issue with it just a fun thing you'll note at no time did I say bug just weird :)15:43
oSoMoNdavmor2, fair enough :)16:00
Mirvogra_: jibel: davmor2: I managed to fix my video thumbnailing problem by removing the registry in .cache/gstreamer-1.0/ a couple of times (and then removing unity-thumbnailer "failures" database to get thumbnails back), but I wouldn't say the problem, discussed on some mailing list (search your mail for gstreamer registry), would be completely fixed for OTA-10 -> OTA-11 upgraders and might cause seriou16:37
Mirvs trouble for at least turbo users (since it seems it affects the fastest device the most)16:37
Mirvdavmor2: s/my video thumbnailing problem/my video thumbnailing and playback of any video problem/16:38
ogra_thumbnails behave fine here16:39
Mirvogra_: it might be because of my data transfer from Bq, hopefully no-one will encounter it then in normal situation anymore. although you also haven't upgraded to rc-proposed.16:44
ogra_yeah, i usually hand-copy my data to not carry over unwanted dot-dirs and caches16:45
ogra_a lot more initial effort, but i can be sure my device is clean16:45
Mirvmaybe popey's buds should be updated to --exclude .cache/gstreamer-1.0 :) (well, really, without smiley too)16:46
Mirvdavmor2: bug #1583944 seems not related to my bug #1584049 since the unlocking from indicator works fine, while it does not according to the bug linked from the former16:49
ubot5bug 1583944 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "It's possible to swipe the SIM PIN dialog away" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/158394416:49
ubot5bug 1580908 in Canonical System Image "duplicate for #1584049 Sim lock screen doesn't appear after restarting the device" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/158090816:49
davmor2hmmm Mirv so I have sim pin unlock on mine at least on initial boot let me try a reboot16:51
MirvI have now booted the rc-proposed several times and it always goes to the phone unlock screen without showing SIM unlock screen. but there's that 1580908 filed indeed that my bug was made duplicate of now.16:52
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOW
bzoltanMirv:  would you help me to publish and merge the silo19 please?17:24
bzoltanMirv:  I am sure you can do it on your huuuuuge screened Pro5 ...17:25
Mirvbzoltan: well if you ask _that_ nicely :) yes it's huge!17:26
bzoltanMirv: i wonder how to get my dirty hand on one of them17:26
Mirvbzoltan: I do manual triple landing as discussed on mailing lists earlier today17:27
bzoltanMirv:  OK17:27
robruMirv: i forgot to mention, you must force merge after manual triple, it won't auto merge because it will expect xenial package in xenial archive, not overlay.17:29
Mirvrobru: oh, ok, thanks!17:29
Mirvbzoltan: so done as you can see vivid+xenial https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/stable-phone-overlay/+packages?batch=75&memo=300&start=300 and yakkety (building) at bottom of https://lists.canonical.com/archives/yakkety-changes/2016-May/thread.html17:30
bzoltanMirv:  thank you!17:31
Mirvdavmor2: I'll keep your hilights on another channel untouched so I remember them on another day :)17:32
davmor2hahahaha17:32
dobeyanyone know anything about http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/16530018/ in yakkety?18:26
dobeymcfly?19:20
robrudobey: no idea19:24
dobeyhmm, i wish the excuses page would show 'Queued' instead of 'Test In Progress' for tests that are queued but not yet running19:29
robrudobey: file a bug against britney19:33
dobeyhaha20:15
dobeywell i guess one 'good' thing about the yakkety migration fiasco is now all the autopkgtests are flagged as 'always failed'20:15
Saviq;)20:30
=== salem_ is now known as _salem

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!