[00:36] <estan> hm, how hard is the "minimum aging period of 7 days" rule wrt to verification-done -> -updates when the bug+fix is quite obvious? i would love to see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octave/+bug/1583128 uploaded to -updates.
[01:02] <slangasek> estan: it's not a hard, fast rule, but a) we don't release updates on Fridays, b) we waive the aging period only when we have some other means of being sure there's adequate regression testing
[01:12] <estan> slangasek: alrighty.
[01:13] <estan> though it is saturday here :p
[01:27] <slangasek> we release even fewer updates on Saturdays ;)
[07:07] <LocutusOfBorg> uff I have 4 ben files to share, can anybody please commit them?
[07:08] <LocutusOfBorg> http://paste.ubuntu.com/16548259/
[07:18] <LocutusOfBorg> the whole borg community will thank a lot whoever commits them :)
[09:01] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, hopefully done
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[17:47] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, sorry! octave has the tracker reversed :( my bad! bad is liboctave3 good is liboctave3v5
[17:50] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, doh ... fixed
[17:56] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks! and sorry again
[19:09] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, looks to be updated the other way round