| Troy^ | Hey anyone here a virtualbox(vboxwebsrv) user? I'm using ubuntu 16.04 and can't seem to get phpvirtualbox to work with vboxwebsrv. configured config.php in /var/www/html/phpvirtualbox as well configured /etc/default/virtualbox. When I navigate to the phpvirtualbox page it loads up with a config.php error. Even tried starting from scratch and still get a php error. It's like it's not talming to | 01:37 |
|---|---|---|
| Troy^ | vboxwebsrv and it should be | 01:37 |
| nacc | Troy^: is 'phpvirtualbox' an ubuntu package? | 01:40 |
| nacc | Troy^: if it is not, does it work with php7? | 01:43 |
| Troy^ | nacc apparently i needed to install php-soap and php-xml it's working now though | 01:54 |
| nacc | Troy^: if you could let me know if that's a packaging issue,t he latter might be due to php7 pulling php-xml out of hte core, and the former might be a missed dep | 02:18 |
| nacc | Troy^: *if* it's an ubuntu pacakge :) -- i can fix it | 02:18 |
| === narciso is now known as narcisco | ||
| kgirthofer | hey alll - trying to ping my domain, getting a unknown host if I leave off the www | 04:25 |
| kgirthofer | any ideas? | 04:25 |
| andol | kgirthofer: Any chance that you don't have any A record for the bare domain? Seem to recall that being ping is looking for. | 04:28 |
| kgirthofer | yea I got that part - I tried cname too | 04:28 |
| kgirthofer | used to work | 04:28 |
| kgirthofer | even if I edit my host file with the ip i'm trying to resolv still no route to host | 04:28 |
| andol | Might be easier for everyone if you specify the domain in question. | 04:29 |
| kgirthofer | mydelphic | 04:30 |
| kgirthofer | .com | 04:30 |
| kgirthofer | it's just a local | 04:31 |
| andol | What by you mean by local? It kind of exists in DNS. | 04:33 |
| andol | Anyway, I do get a DNS response for mydelphic.com, and while that ip (173.15.136.74) don't appear to respond to ICMP Ping it is responding to http requests. | 04:36 |
| kgirthofer | yea we have ping off | 04:36 |
| kgirthofer | nah if I do an ns for that domain i get no route to host | 04:36 |
| kgirthofer | I should get 10.201.1.100 | 04:36 |
| andol | Why would you expect to get 10.201.1.100? Aside from that being an RFC1918-address, that is not what it says in DNS. | 04:37 |
| kgirthofer | because that's what my internal dns shows | 04:37 |
| andol | Also, why do you use the ping too. if you purposely don't expect it to respond to pings? :) | 04:37 |
| kgirthofer | not from outside | 04:37 |
| kgirthofer | i'm internal - I can ping what ever I want | 04:38 |
| kgirthofer | but I'm expecting mydelphic to resolve internally to 10.201.1.100 - one of our webservers | 04:38 |
| andol | Also, strictly speaking ping doesn't do a DNS lookup, it does hostname lookup, where DNS is one source, but not neccesarily the default/primary one. | 04:38 |
| kgirthofer | ya ping resolves | 04:39 |
| kgirthofer | so does internet | 04:39 |
| kgirthofer | they translate to www. | 04:39 |
| kgirthofer | ugh | 04:40 |
| kgirthofer | no parent folder | 04:40 |
| kgirthofer | got it | 04:40 |
| kgirthofer | fuck i'm exhauted. I'm at 45 hours this week... it's wednesday | 04:40 |
| andol | Oh, well, sounds like you solved the issue, whatever it was? | 04:41 |
| kgirthofer | ya | 04:41 |
| kgirthofer | thanks for your help | 04:41 |
| === NegativeFlare_ is now known as NegativeFlare | ||
| Repox | Hi. So, I just pinged a domain name and I got this result "64 bytes from 149.126.72.171.ip.incapdns.net (149.126.72.171)" I'm unsure as to what the ip.incapdns.net is (I mean, why do I get that information and what do I call it in this context)? | 07:08 |
| sarnold | Repox: reverse dns lookup -- it converts IPs back to names | 07:09 |
| sarnold | Repox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_DNS_lookup | 07:09 |
| sarnold | Repox: most tools provide an -n option to disable this lookup | 07:10 |
| Lope | If anyone here is running a 4.4 kernel (type `uname -r` to check, you will be if you use Ubuntu 16.04). So if you have a 4.4 kernel and you're running an NFS server, if you could be so kind as to try mounting one of your NFS shares with NFSv3 (instead of the default NFSv4) I would really appreciate you to provide feedback on my Kernel Bug report. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118881 | 07:10 |
| Repox | sarnold , great, thank you for the info. I'll try and look it up. | 07:10 |
| Lope | Just test like this: `mount NFSSERVERIP:/nfs/shared/path /tmp/testmount -o ro,vers=3` | 07:10 |
| ubottu | Error: Could not parse XML returned by bugzilla.kernel.org: timed out (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118881&ctype=xml) | 07:10 |
| === gugugaga is now known as gagagugu | ||
| sarnold | Lope: this worked without error: sudo mount -tnfs -o ro,nfsvers=3 192.168.122.1:/srv/mirror/ubuntu /tmp/testmount/ | 07:14 |
| sarnold | Lope: note nfsvers=3 vs vers=3 | 07:15 |
| Lope | sarnold: what's the diff between nfsvers and vers ? | 07:15 |
| sarnold | Lope: sigh. i typoed "vers3" the first time and didn't notice. | 07:16 |
| sarnold | Lope: vers=3 also works | 07:16 |
| Lope | what kernel version is your server? | 07:16 |
| sarnold | 4.4.0-22-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP Thu May 5 16:53:32 UTC 2016 | 07:17 |
| Lope | can you please try in this format? `mount 192.168.122.1:/srv/mirror/ubuntu /tmp/testmount -o ro,vers=3` | 07:18 |
| sarnold | Lope: worked fine | 07:19 |
| Lope | what do you get for `cat /proc/filesystems | grep nfs` | 07:20 |
| sarnold | nfs and nfs4 | 07:20 |
| Lope | ah, same as my ubuntu server. so it's normal not to see nfs3 there. | 07:20 |
| Lope | what do you get for these? `cat /proc/sys/fs/nfs/nlm_tcpport` `cat /proc/sys/fs/nfs/nlm_udpport` | 07:23 |
| sarnold | Lope: 0 0 | 07:26 |
| Lope | hmm, i wonder if it's my setup. | 07:27 |
| Lope | I'm gonna document my settings as well in the bug report. | 07:27 |
| jatin30 | I am trying to set up LAMP in my system. It syas in the instructions "Change the DocumentRoot to point to the new location. For example, /home/user/public_html/" but there is no such directory currently present in the system. what to do? | 07:38 |
| === narcisco is now known as narcissus | ||
| Lope | sarnold: thanks, I've identified it's my iptables rules somehow blocking NFSv3 but not NFSv4 | 07:49 |
| sarnold | Lope: woot. :) iirc nfs4 moved to fixed ports, nfs3 still had the portmap and ostensibly selected-at-random ports, right? | 07:49 |
| Lope | Yes! | 07:50 |
| Lope | exactly, So i scripted and set some options in various config files to try to control those random ports so I could make effective iptables rules. | 07:51 |
| Lope | But maybe NFSv3 is not obeying those ports anymore? | 07:51 |
| Lope | I don't know. | 07:51 |
| Lope | all of the guides I've seen for setting up NFS to work with a firewall say that you must set the various services to use a specific port number. I've been unable to set the port for mountd using the command they recommend: `mountd -p 32767` mountd not found. Yet my nfs server is installed and working, what's going on? | 08:11 |
| sarnold | are they fro mthe era of user-land nfs server/ | 08:12 |
| Lope | I've got no idea. | 08:13 |
| Lope | 1. http://nfs.sourceforge.net/nfs-howto/ar01s06.html#srv_security_nfsd_mountd | 08:13 |
| Lope | 2. http://tldp.org/HOWTO/NFS-HOWTO/security.html | 08:13 |
| Lope | oh, i see the command has changed. now it's rpc.mountd | 08:16 |
| jamespage | coreycb, xenial/ironic builds fixed - for some reason, the schroot's where not getting a /etc/hosts - I added this to the copyfiles for the sbuild profile and we're all good again.. | 09:29 |
| === _degorenko|afk is now known as degorenko | ||
| jatin30 | can anyone help me with this http://imgur.com/cMB4zM1 ? | 10:44 |
| hateball | jatin30: < and > are used for redirecting in the shell, use \ to escape | 10:47 |
| ankitkulkarni | jatin30, can you post the output of pwd | 10:47 |
| hateball | jatin30: like \<b\> | 10:48 |
| jatin30 | ankitkulkarni: yes just a min | 10:48 |
| jatin30 | ankitkulkarni: here, http://imgur.com/cMB4zM1 and can i please dm you? | 10:49 |
| ankitkulkarni | yea | 10:50 |
| shauno | I think you're overthinking it. you're trying to >/home/user/public_html/index.html instead of /home/jatin... | 10:56 |
| hateball | I only looked at the syntax error bits, heh | 10:56 |
| shauno | yeah. you expect <> to go horribly wrong, and miss that bash is complaining /home/user... doesn't exist | 10:58 |
| jatin30 | Why am I getting http://imgur.com/Fw6kC2R after installing apache 2 properly | 11:15 |
| shauno | jatin30: see my last couple of lines; where your instructions have /home/user you need to replace that with your actual username | 11:16 |
| jatin30 | yeah I did that | 11:17 |
| jatin30 | I completed all steps properly | 11:17 |
| jatin30 | i followed this link https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ApacheMySQLPHP | 11:17 |
| jatin30 | everything was fine and it initally detected apache so i did not troubleshoot it | 11:17 |
| jatin30 | and went straight to the virtual hosts and did all what was required , now its not detecting | 11:18 |
| coreycb | jamespage, interesting on ironic, thanks | 11:35 |
| jamespage | coreycb, I suspect some cruft due to the long running nature of that installation... | 11:40 |
| Ergo^ | hello, im provisioning 16.04 VM's, they have the "predictable network interface" systemd scheme, now when someone gets an OVA and uses it - the network interface might be completly different however /etc/networking/interfaces has "auto IFACENAME | 13:22 |
| Ergo^ | " hardcoded, how to deal with that | 13:22 |
| rbasak | Ergo^: if you're preparing an image and it'll only get used with one interface, then perhaps turn off the renaming and rely on it being eth0? | 13:23 |
| rbasak | I'm not exactly sure how to do that but I believe it's configurable. | 13:23 |
| Ergo^ | yeah, its supposed to take a symlink for udev to disable it, but its not working | 13:24 |
| rbasak | nacc: if you're about during the next hour, shall we sync? | 13:27 |
| Odd_Bloke | Ergo^: Ubuntu doesn't ship an /etc/networking/interfaces with hard-coded interface names; how are those getting created? | 13:29 |
| Ergo^ | Odd_Bloke: maybe during install?, i wrote the provisioning scripts so im not doing it | 13:29 |
| Odd_Bloke | Ergo^: Where is the install happening? | 13:30 |
| Odd_Bloke | Ergo^: (If you're installing VMs from the ISO, you might want to consider using the cloud images instead :) | 13:30 |
| Ergo^ | hmm, wait, im actually using a seed file | 13:30 |
| Ergo^ | let me consult that | 13:30 |
| Ergo^ | maybe there is something there | 13:31 |
| Ergo^ | im provisioning with packer | 13:31 |
| rbasak | That uses the installer I believe. | 13:31 |
| Odd_Bloke | Ah, OK, that makes sense; packer doesn't support the cloud images AFAIK. | 13:31 |
| rbasak | File a bug with packer. | 13:31 |
| Ergo^ | and https://friendpaste.com/O1nBAQvyRzvxprmecZjpT i end up with that | 13:32 |
| rbasak | Ubuntu's answer to the general problem is cloud images that use cloud-init. | 13:32 |
| Odd_Bloke | Ergo^: But, yeah, if you're doing VMs you'll want to ensure that (a) /etc/network/interfaces isn't being overwritten, and (b) cloud-init runs on boot so it can handle changing interface names for you. :) | 13:32 |
| rbasak | cloud-init handles the fact that an image can end up running in a different environment. | 13:32 |
| rbasak | Running the installer to set up a VM image that will then run in a different environment is a hack. We'll consider fixes for issues, but we don't think it's the right path forward. Cloud images work far better for this use case. | 13:33 |
| Ergo^ | https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/ - i wanted to use the solution from here | 13:34 |
| Ergo^ | ln -s /dev/null /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules | 13:34 |
| Ergo^ | but its not working | 13:34 |
| rbasak | I don't know if that exact method applies to Ubuntu, but the general idea should work. If it doesn't, it's either a bug or different instructions need to be followed. | 13:35 |
| Ergo^ | https://friendpaste.com/2BFcFawTd8D5opSHqClAue - this is my preseed file | 13:37 |
| Ergo^ | no other places where it can be rewritten | 13:39 |
| Ergo^ | but I can overwrite it on my own at the end of provisioning... what the /etc/network/interfaces should look like on a cloud image? | 13:40 |
| rbasak | http://askubuntu.com/questions/689070/network-interface-name-changes-after-update-to-15-10-udev-changes says to pass net.ifnames=0 on the kernel command line. | 13:40 |
| rbasak | Have you tried that? | 13:40 |
| Ergo^ | that works, i wanted to avoid this solution though :-) | 13:41 |
| Ergo^ | I guess i can work with that if no other options are available | 13:41 |
| rbasak | That seems to be the formal interface in Ubuntu to disable this. | 13:41 |
| rbasak | I'm sure you can do it in userspace afterwards, but you'll need to figure out how by following the implementation. | 13:41 |
| Ergo^ | ok, thx | 13:42 |
| === inaddy is now known as tinoco | ||
| tanja84 | I would like to know if there could be some problems upgrading a "old" 14.10 server ( with zfs support installed ) to a 16.04 LTS. The reason is that I would be sad if my zfs went down just because of the dist upgrade ( I have a backup but its in the cloud ) | 14:18 |
| compdoc | I upgraded from 14.04 that used ZOL, to 16.04 without ZOL. works great | 14:20 |
| compdoc | I installed 16.04 from scratch, tho | 14:21 |
| patdk-wk | why would it go down? | 14:22 |
| patdk-wk | if you have dkms installed, the zfs dkms module will override the other module | 14:22 |
| tanja84 | patdk-wk: well its the zfs kernel module I'm worried for, because I have never tried to dist-upgrade from a non lts to a lts before | 14:23 |
| patdk-wk | well, you cannot upgrade from 14.10 to 16.04 | 14:23 |
| Pici | welll, you can attempt it, but it definitely isn't a supported path | 14:24 |
| tanja84 | so its a reformat then. Thanks for the answer, I guess it has to run 6 month still | 14:24 |
| tanja84 | reformat = reinstall | 14:25 |
| tanja84 | and yes I do know that 14.10 almost have been EOL for a year | 14:26 |
| tanja84 | I guess it wont be ubuntu next time because if the hazzle to upgrade | 14:28 |
| Odd_Bloke | tanja84: There is an upgrade path; you upgrade to vivid, then to wily, then to xenial. :) | 14:38 |
| patdk-wk | after you adjust your stuff to use the archive/old-releases servers | 14:38 |
| tanja84 | Odd_Bloke: well and how much will breake then | 14:46 |
| tanja84 | after all those steps | 14:46 |
| Odd_Bloke | tanja84: They're the same steps that everyone who upgraded from utopic through to xenial will have taken, so they should be pretty well tested. | 14:47 |
| tanja84 | I guess I just have to change distro when I get some new drive's home to get the local backup but that is still first in 5 - 6 month | 14:47 |
| tanja84 | Odd_Bloke: well you mean tested as in ubuntu fails | 14:48 |
| Odd_Bloke | tanja84: If you aren't interested in a constructive discussion, I can't help you. :) | 14:48 |
| tanja84 | I du remember kernels from ubuntu failing to boot after upgrades | 14:48 |
| tanja84 | Odd_Bloke: and do you recover my zfs raid then if it cant find it after the first upgrade | 14:49 |
| nacc | rbasak: i'm here now | 14:50 |
| * patdk-wk doesn't remember this | 14:50 | |
| patdk-wk | tanja84, you are also not using lts, so your not exactly using the most stable, and well tested version | 14:51 |
| patdk-wk | so having problems, sounds like something you opted for when you started | 14:51 |
| tanja84 | patdk-wk: that was only because I was miss informed when the server was installed | 14:51 |
| patdk-wk | misinformed? | 14:51 |
| patdk-wk | the documentation is everywhere | 14:51 |
| tanja84 | I got the disk from one because I didnt had internet where the pc were | 14:52 |
| patdk-wk | installing zfs also, on that ubuntu version is not *supported* | 14:52 |
| tanja84 | it was in here I was recommended that | 14:52 |
| patdk-wk | if the goal was to run zfs, yes, good recommendation | 14:53 |
| patdk-wk | if the goal is to have a stable system, without issues, without constant upgrades, no, zfs or that version where not the answer | 14:53 |
| patdk-wk | but yes, it does sound like your goal and priorities have changed | 14:54 |
| tanja84 | well the goal was to secure the data for corruptions wich ext cant | 14:54 |
| patdk-wk | yes, good solution | 14:55 |
| tanja84 | wich the reason there were created a zfs mirror of 3 disks | 14:55 |
| patdk-wk | but the side effects of that is, maintaince, and upgrades, and sometimes things breaking | 14:55 |
| patdk-wk | cause the solution isn't supported by ubuntu, atleast wasn't till 16.04 | 14:55 |
| patdk-wk | the solution is not supported at all by anyone else yet | 14:56 |
| patdk-wk | except I think debian is starting to | 14:56 |
| tanja84 | I guess then its complete bye bye linux for recommending things there arent supported | 14:56 |
| tanja84 | specially in the official channels | 14:57 |
| patdk-wk | heh? | 14:57 |
| nacc | tanja84: you would have been quite clearly indicated something wasn't supported by adding PPAs, or building from source, or whatever | 14:57 |
| nacc | tanja84: and this is all volunteer response in here, anyways | 14:58 |
| nacc | tanja84: *technically*, anyone can say anything they want in response to your query | 14:58 |
| nacc | IMO, as a system installer, it is on you to make technical decisions about how to install | 14:58 |
| nacc | finally, ubuntu != linux | 14:59 |
| nacc | tanja84: i'm not trying to be rude, to be clear -- but your responses seem like an overreaction/misunderstanding | 15:03 |
| nacc | rbasak: i'll be free to chat after the meeting too | 15:03 |
| tanja84 | nacc: well since canonical bought ubuntu back in the days then it always sounds like ubuntu is the only linux now a days | 15:04 |
| nacc | tanja84: uhhhh | 15:04 |
| nacc | tanja84: ok, that's further misunderstanding, let's be clear | 15:05 |
| patdk-wk | bought? | 15:07 |
| patdk-wk | strange world you live in | 15:07 |
| patdk-wk | there are so many, and even more versions of linux os's today, than there where 10years ago | 15:08 |
| nacc | rbasak: so we assumed security and updates were in lockstep; perhaps that wasn't always the case. clamav 0.92~dfsg-2~dapper1ubuntu0.2 (security) followed 0.92.1~dfsg2-1.1~dapper1 (updates). | 16:10 |
| nacc | rbasak: let me konw if you want to do a hangout today, i know it's getting (is) late your time | 16:30 |
| notthistime | can anyone help me port forward. i have port 80 forwarded on a PK5000 but the online port checker says it port 80 ist still closed | 16:35 |
| coreycb | jamespage, qemu - 1:2.2+dfsg-5expubuntu9.7~cloud4 is ready to promote to kilo-proposed | 16:43 |
| jamespage | coreycb, \o/ - I'll do that now | 16:43 |
| jamespage | coreycb, done | 16:44 |
| coreycb | jamespage, thanks! | 16:44 |
| jamespage | you'll need to manually handle in the bug unless you added it to the changelog | 16:44 |
| rbasak | nacc: is now OK? | 16:45 |
| nacc | rbasak: sure | 16:45 |
| nacc | rbasak: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+publishinghistory?batch=75&direction=backwards&memo=525&start=450 | 16:52 |
| synchronet | bugs are built in I reckon | 16:56 |
| synchronet | bit like the law legal system and solicitors and future work | 16:57 |
| nacc | rbasak: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/0.92.1~dfsg2-1.1~dapper1 | 16:58 |
| nacc | rbasak: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/0.92~dfsg-2~dapper1ubuntu0.2 | 16:58 |
| rbasak | http://pad.ubuntu.com/clamav-dapper | 17:06 |
| genii | dapper? | 17:18 |
| === degorenko is now known as _degorenko|afk | ||
| rbasak | Dapper. | 17:24 |
| nacc | genii: crazy publishing history :) | 17:24 |
| synchronet | Ubuntu can you stop the updates by hiring decent developers | 17:54 |
| synchronet | especially server reboot needed ones | 17:54 |
| Pici | I don't even know how to respond to that. | 17:55 |
| jrwren | synchronet: please remember: http://www.ubuntu.com/about/about-ubuntu/conduct | 17:56 |
| patdk-wk | synchronet, why are you compaining about updates? | 17:58 |
| patdk-wk | updates coming out often is a good thing | 17:59 |
| patdk-wk | but maybe you mean security patches | 17:59 |
| patdk-wk | though, dunno what ubuntu developers have to do with any of the above | 18:00 |
| synchronet | patdk-wk: just tired I suppose | 18:05 |
| dasjoe | I'm not sure I follow | 18:07 |
| synchronet | narrow mindedness is no excuse | 18:08 |
| Lope | how can I disable the fancy boot screen in ubuntu-server? I want to see the log | 18:59 |
| b4r | funny I was wondering about acquiring a fancy boot screen so as to *not* see the log | 18:59 |
| \9 | I was wondering today about having a fancy boot screen *with* the log | 19:00 |
| sarnold | probably 'plymouth' is the answer to both questions :) | 19:00 |
| Sling | Lope: see /etc/default/grub and remove the 'splash quiet' | 19:00 |
| teward | sarnold: ohai! | 19:00 |
| Sling | (or wherever thats at now) | 19:00 |
| sarnold | morning teward :) | 19:00 |
| Lope | sling: thanks! | 19:00 |
| coreycb | jamespage, neutron 2:8.1.0-0ubuntu0.16.04.2~cloud0 is ready to promote to mitaka-proposed | 19:13 |
| b4r | anyone in particular working on php7.0 package and updating to 7.0.7 from currently 7.0.4? | 19:15 |
| nacc | b4r: in which release? | 19:33 |
| b4r | uh | 19:33 |
| b4r | 16.04 | 19:33 |
| nacc | b4r: well, a SRU microrelease exception has been filed: LP: #1569609 | 19:34 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1569609 in php7.0 (Ubuntu) "[SRU] microrelease exception for src:php7.0" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1569609 | 19:34 |
| b4r | nacc: oh nice, are they filed usuallly on launchpad? I wouldn't mind attempting to keep up with this | 19:34 |
| nacc | if that were to be granted, we'd be able to update to 7.0.x | 19:34 |
| b4r | tbh it was more of a "woah they updated today and it's not in the repos" | 19:34 |
| nacc | b4r: until that happens though, we have to selectively backport | 19:34 |
| b4r | understood | 19:35 |
| nacc | b4r: well, no package gets updated just becuase upstream does, at least not automatically, in a released version | 19:35 |
| sarnold | ... in fact it's fairly rare. firefox, chrome-browser, mysql / mariadb are the most common ones.. there's a few others that get it periodically but it's rare | 19:40 |
| nacc | sarnold: good point! | 19:40 |
| nacc | b4r: hence the explicit bug requesting it for php7.0 | 19:40 |
| emdub | hmm, what's the deal with mysql-server on xenial? dpkg-reconfigure used to prompt for setting the root password, but it doesn't do that in xenial anymore so my database has some root password that i didn't enter | 21:17 |
| emdub | (asked in #ubuntu, but this is a -server install so figured i would try here too) | 21:17 |
| emdub | i can obviously make it bypass the grant table and fix it, but i feel like i'm missing something or there is a bug here with the package | 21:18 |
| emdub | aha, this is a xenial change: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-mysql/mysql-5.7.git/tree/debian/NEWS?id=1025a9fa9c6c112913c59138db49dbc94891d20f | 21:25 |
| dasjoe | madwizard: did you see https://github.com/b333z/beadm? | 21:40 |
| jjohnston | hello I have a question about booting new nodes in MaaS 1.9 | 22:01 |
| jjohnston | on new nodes (non-ready) is there a way to force maas to repartition the disks? | 22:02 |
| jjohnston | that doesn't include me deleting/recreating the arrays on my storage controller? | 22:03 |
| notthistime | i have port 8080 open in router but cannot connect to server. any ideas? | 22:52 |
| notthistime | i can get the server by going localhost:8080 | 22:53 |
| sarnold | notthistime: check netstat -lnp output, see what address the process it bound to | 22:53 |
| notthistime | did netstat not sure what im looking for | 22:56 |
| sarnold | if the local address looks like this: 127.0.0.1:2628 then it's not listening externally | 22:57 |
| notthistime | 127.0.0.1:53 | 22:57 |
| sarnold | if it looks like 0.0.0.0:22 or 192.168.122.1:53 then it is listening externally -- the first case, all interfaceds, the second case only that specific IP address | 22:57 |
| sarnold | that's probably just a dns server :) look for :8000 | 22:58 |
| notthistime | no 8000 | 22:58 |
| notthistime | 8080 | 22:59 |
| notthistime | listening on 8080 | 22:59 |
| nacc | notthistime: ok, look for 8080 :) | 22:59 |
| sarnold | ah. apparently I'm getting old. | 22:59 |
| notthistime | tcp6 0 0 :::8080 :::* LISTEN | 23:00 |
| notthistime | im not sure what im looking for | 23:00 |
| sarnold | that's an ipv6 address; did you let tcp6 port 8080 through as well? do you have an ipv6 address? should you configure your application to also listen on 0.0.0.0:8080 so it works on ipv4? | 23:01 |
| notthistime | ipv6 was set to ignore. changed to DHCP | 23:03 |
| notthistime | it works on 0.0.0.0:8080 | 23:04 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!