[01:37] Hey anyone here a virtualbox(vboxwebsrv) user? I'm using ubuntu 16.04 and can't seem to get phpvirtualbox to work with vboxwebsrv. configured config.php in /var/www/html/phpvirtualbox as well configured /etc/default/virtualbox. When I navigate to the phpvirtualbox page it loads up with a config.php error. Even tried starting from scratch and still get a php error. It's like it's not talming to [01:37] vboxwebsrv and it should be [01:40] Troy^: is 'phpvirtualbox' an ubuntu package? [01:43] Troy^: if it is not, does it work with php7? [01:54] nacc apparently i needed to install php-soap and php-xml it's working now though [02:18] Troy^: if you could let me know if that's a packaging issue,t he latter might be due to php7 pulling php-xml out of hte core, and the former might be a missed dep [02:18] Troy^: *if* it's an ubuntu pacakge :) -- i can fix it === narciso is now known as narcisco [04:25] hey alll - trying to ping my domain, getting a unknown host if I leave off the www [04:25] any ideas? [04:28] kgirthofer: Any chance that you don't have any A record for the bare domain? Seem to recall that being ping is looking for. [04:28] yea I got that part - I tried cname too [04:28] used to work [04:28] even if I edit my host file with the ip i'm trying to resolv still no route to host [04:29] Might be easier for everyone if you specify the domain in question. [04:30] mydelphic [04:30] .com [04:31] it's just a local [04:33] What by you mean by local? It kind of exists in DNS. [04:36] Anyway, I do get a DNS response for mydelphic.com, and while that ip (173.15.136.74) don't appear to respond to ICMP Ping it is responding to http requests. [04:36] yea we have ping off [04:36] nah if I do an ns for that domain i get no route to host [04:36] I should get 10.201.1.100 [04:37] Why would you expect to get 10.201.1.100? Aside from that being an RFC1918-address, that is not what it says in DNS. [04:37] because that's what my internal dns shows [04:37] Also, why do you use the ping too. if you purposely don't expect it to respond to pings? :) [04:37] not from outside [04:38] i'm internal - I can ping what ever I want [04:38] but I'm expecting mydelphic to resolve internally to 10.201.1.100 - one of our webservers [04:38] Also, strictly speaking ping doesn't do a DNS lookup, it does hostname lookup, where DNS is one source, but not neccesarily the default/primary one. [04:39] ya ping resolves [04:39] so does internet [04:39] they translate to www. [04:40] ugh [04:40] no parent folder [04:40] got it [04:40] fuck i'm exhauted. I'm at 45 hours this week... it's wednesday [04:41] Oh, well, sounds like you solved the issue, whatever it was? [04:41] ya [04:41] thanks for your help === NegativeFlare_ is now known as NegativeFlare [07:08] Hi. So, I just pinged a domain name and I got this result "64 bytes from 149.126.72.171.ip.incapdns.net (149.126.72.171)" I'm unsure as to what the ip.incapdns.net is (I mean, why do I get that information and what do I call it in this context)? [07:09] Repox: reverse dns lookup -- it converts IPs back to names [07:09] Repox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_DNS_lookup [07:10] Repox: most tools provide an -n option to disable this lookup [07:10] If anyone here is running a 4.4 kernel (type `uname -r` to check, you will be if you use Ubuntu 16.04). So if you have a 4.4 kernel and you're running an NFS server, if you could be so kind as to try mounting one of your NFS shares with NFSv3 (instead of the default NFSv4) I would really appreciate you to provide feedback on my Kernel Bug report. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118881 [07:10] sarnold , great, thank you for the info. I'll try and look it up. [07:10] Just test like this: `mount NFSSERVERIP:/nfs/shared/path /tmp/testmount -o ro,vers=3` [07:10] Error: Could not parse XML returned by bugzilla.kernel.org: timed out (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118881&ctype=xml) === gugugaga is now known as gagagugu [07:14] Lope: this worked without error: sudo mount -tnfs -o ro,nfsvers=3 192.168.122.1:/srv/mirror/ubuntu /tmp/testmount/ [07:15] Lope: note nfsvers=3 vs vers=3 [07:15] sarnold: what's the diff between nfsvers and vers ? [07:16] Lope: sigh. i typoed "vers3" the first time and didn't notice. [07:16] Lope: vers=3 also works [07:16] what kernel version is your server? [07:17] 4.4.0-22-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP Thu May 5 16:53:32 UTC 2016 [07:18] can you please try in this format? `mount 192.168.122.1:/srv/mirror/ubuntu /tmp/testmount -o ro,vers=3` [07:19] Lope: worked fine [07:20] what do you get for `cat /proc/filesystems | grep nfs` [07:20] nfs and nfs4 [07:20] ah, same as my ubuntu server. so it's normal not to see nfs3 there. [07:23] what do you get for these? `cat /proc/sys/fs/nfs/nlm_tcpport` `cat /proc/sys/fs/nfs/nlm_udpport` [07:26] Lope: 0 0 [07:27] hmm, i wonder if it's my setup. [07:27] I'm gonna document my settings as well in the bug report. [07:38] I am trying to set up LAMP in my system. It syas in the instructions "Change the DocumentRoot to point to the new location. For example, /home/user/public_html/" but there is no such directory currently present in the system. what to do? === narcisco is now known as narcissus [07:49] sarnold: thanks, I've identified it's my iptables rules somehow blocking NFSv3 but not NFSv4 [07:49] Lope: woot. :) iirc nfs4 moved to fixed ports, nfs3 still had the portmap and ostensibly selected-at-random ports, right? [07:50] Yes! [07:51] exactly, So i scripted and set some options in various config files to try to control those random ports so I could make effective iptables rules. [07:51] But maybe NFSv3 is not obeying those ports anymore? [07:51] I don't know. [08:11] all of the guides I've seen for setting up NFS to work with a firewall say that you must set the various services to use a specific port number. I've been unable to set the port for mountd using the command they recommend: `mountd -p 32767` mountd not found. Yet my nfs server is installed and working, what's going on? [08:12] are they fro mthe era of user-land nfs server/ [08:13] I've got no idea. [08:13] 1. http://nfs.sourceforge.net/nfs-howto/ar01s06.html#srv_security_nfsd_mountd [08:13] 2. http://tldp.org/HOWTO/NFS-HOWTO/security.html [08:16] oh, i see the command has changed. now it's rpc.mountd [09:29] coreycb, xenial/ironic builds fixed - for some reason, the schroot's where not getting a /etc/hosts - I added this to the copyfiles for the sbuild profile and we're all good again.. === _degorenko|afk is now known as degorenko [10:44] can anyone help me with this http://imgur.com/cMB4zM1 ? [10:47] jatin30: < and > are used for redirecting in the shell, use \ to escape [10:47] jatin30, can you post the output of pwd [10:48] jatin30: like \ [10:48] ankitkulkarni: yes just a min [10:49] ankitkulkarni: here, http://imgur.com/cMB4zM1 and can i please dm you? [10:50] yea [10:56] I think you're overthinking it. you're trying to >/home/user/public_html/index.html instead of /home/jatin... [10:56] I only looked at the syntax error bits, heh [10:58] yeah. you expect <> to go horribly wrong, and miss that bash is complaining /home/user... doesn't exist [11:15] Why am I getting http://imgur.com/Fw6kC2R after installing apache 2 properly [11:16] jatin30: see my last couple of lines; where your instructions have /home/user you need to replace that with your actual username [11:17] yeah I did that [11:17] I completed all steps properly [11:17] i followed this link https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ApacheMySQLPHP [11:17] everything was fine and it initally detected apache so i did not troubleshoot it [11:18] and went straight to the virtual hosts and did all what was required , now its not detecting [11:35] jamespage, interesting on ironic, thanks [11:40] coreycb, I suspect some cruft due to the long running nature of that installation... [13:22] hello, im provisioning 16.04 VM's, they have the "predictable network interface" systemd scheme, now when someone gets an OVA and uses it - the network interface might be completly different however /etc/networking/interfaces has "auto IFACENAME [13:22] " hardcoded, how to deal with that [13:23] Ergo^: if you're preparing an image and it'll only get used with one interface, then perhaps turn off the renaming and rely on it being eth0? [13:23] I'm not exactly sure how to do that but I believe it's configurable. [13:24] yeah, its supposed to take a symlink for udev to disable it, but its not working [13:27] nacc: if you're about during the next hour, shall we sync? [13:29] Ergo^: Ubuntu doesn't ship an /etc/networking/interfaces with hard-coded interface names; how are those getting created? [13:29] Odd_Bloke: maybe during install?, i wrote the provisioning scripts so im not doing it [13:30] Ergo^: Where is the install happening? [13:30] Ergo^: (If you're installing VMs from the ISO, you might want to consider using the cloud images instead :) [13:30] hmm, wait, im actually using a seed file [13:30] let me consult that [13:31] maybe there is something there [13:31] im provisioning with packer [13:31] That uses the installer I believe. [13:31] Ah, OK, that makes sense; packer doesn't support the cloud images AFAIK. [13:31] File a bug with packer. [13:32] and https://friendpaste.com/O1nBAQvyRzvxprmecZjpT i end up with that [13:32] Ubuntu's answer to the general problem is cloud images that use cloud-init. [13:32] Ergo^: But, yeah, if you're doing VMs you'll want to ensure that (a) /etc/network/interfaces isn't being overwritten, and (b) cloud-init runs on boot so it can handle changing interface names for you. :) [13:32] cloud-init handles the fact that an image can end up running in a different environment. [13:33] Running the installer to set up a VM image that will then run in a different environment is a hack. We'll consider fixes for issues, but we don't think it's the right path forward. Cloud images work far better for this use case. [13:34] https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/ - i wanted to use the solution from here [13:34] ln -s /dev/null /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules [13:34] but its not working [13:35] I don't know if that exact method applies to Ubuntu, but the general idea should work. If it doesn't, it's either a bug or different instructions need to be followed. [13:37] https://friendpaste.com/2BFcFawTd8D5opSHqClAue - this is my preseed file [13:39] no other places where it can be rewritten [13:40] but I can overwrite it on my own at the end of provisioning... what the /etc/network/interfaces should look like on a cloud image? [13:40] http://askubuntu.com/questions/689070/network-interface-name-changes-after-update-to-15-10-udev-changes says to pass net.ifnames=0 on the kernel command line. [13:40] Have you tried that? [13:41] that works, i wanted to avoid this solution though :-) [13:41] I guess i can work with that if no other options are available [13:41] That seems to be the formal interface in Ubuntu to disable this. [13:41] I'm sure you can do it in userspace afterwards, but you'll need to figure out how by following the implementation. [13:42] ok, thx === inaddy is now known as tinoco [14:18] I would like to know if there could be some problems upgrading a "old" 14.10 server ( with zfs support installed ) to a 16.04 LTS. The reason is that I would be sad if my zfs went down just because of the dist upgrade ( I have a backup but its in the cloud ) [14:20] I upgraded from 14.04 that used ZOL, to 16.04 without ZOL. works great [14:21] I installed 16.04 from scratch, tho [14:22] why would it go down? [14:22] if you have dkms installed, the zfs dkms module will override the other module [14:23] patdk-wk: well its the zfs kernel module I'm worried for, because I have never tried to dist-upgrade from a non lts to a lts before [14:23] well, you cannot upgrade from 14.10 to 16.04 [14:24] welll, you can attempt it, but it definitely isn't a supported path [14:24] so its a reformat then. Thanks for the answer, I guess it has to run 6 month still [14:25] reformat = reinstall [14:26] and yes I do know that 14.10 almost have been EOL for a year [14:28] I guess it wont be ubuntu next time because if the hazzle to upgrade [14:38] tanja84: There is an upgrade path; you upgrade to vivid, then to wily, then to xenial. :) [14:38] after you adjust your stuff to use the archive/old-releases servers [14:46] Odd_Bloke: well and how much will breake then [14:46] after all those steps [14:47] tanja84: They're the same steps that everyone who upgraded from utopic through to xenial will have taken, so they should be pretty well tested. [14:47] I guess I just have to change distro when I get some new drive's home to get the local backup but that is still first in 5 - 6 month [14:48] Odd_Bloke: well you mean tested as in ubuntu fails [14:48] tanja84: If you aren't interested in a constructive discussion, I can't help you. :) [14:48] I du remember kernels from ubuntu failing to boot after upgrades [14:49] Odd_Bloke: and do you recover my zfs raid then if it cant find it after the first upgrade [14:50] rbasak: i'm here now [14:50] * patdk-wk doesn't remember this [14:51] tanja84, you are also not using lts, so your not exactly using the most stable, and well tested version [14:51] so having problems, sounds like something you opted for when you started [14:51] patdk-wk: that was only because I was miss informed when the server was installed [14:51] misinformed? [14:51] the documentation is everywhere [14:52] I got the disk from one because I didnt had internet where the pc were [14:52] installing zfs also, on that ubuntu version is not *supported* [14:52] it was in here I was recommended that [14:53] if the goal was to run zfs, yes, good recommendation [14:53] if the goal is to have a stable system, without issues, without constant upgrades, no, zfs or that version where not the answer [14:54] but yes, it does sound like your goal and priorities have changed [14:54] well the goal was to secure the data for corruptions wich ext cant [14:55] yes, good solution [14:55] wich the reason there were created a zfs mirror of 3 disks [14:55] but the side effects of that is, maintaince, and upgrades, and sometimes things breaking [14:55] cause the solution isn't supported by ubuntu, atleast wasn't till 16.04 [14:56] the solution is not supported at all by anyone else yet [14:56] except I think debian is starting to [14:56] I guess then its complete bye bye linux for recommending things there arent supported [14:57] specially in the official channels [14:57] heh? [14:57] tanja84: you would have been quite clearly indicated something wasn't supported by adding PPAs, or building from source, or whatever [14:58] tanja84: and this is all volunteer response in here, anyways [14:58] tanja84: *technically*, anyone can say anything they want in response to your query [14:58] IMO, as a system installer, it is on you to make technical decisions about how to install [14:59] finally, ubuntu != linux [15:03] tanja84: i'm not trying to be rude, to be clear -- but your responses seem like an overreaction/misunderstanding [15:03] rbasak: i'll be free to chat after the meeting too [15:04] nacc: well since canonical bought ubuntu back in the days then it always sounds like ubuntu is the only linux now a days [15:04] tanja84: uhhhh [15:05] tanja84: ok, that's further misunderstanding, let's be clear [15:07] bought? [15:07] strange world you live in [15:08] there are so many, and even more versions of linux os's today, than there where 10years ago [16:10] rbasak: so we assumed security and updates were in lockstep; perhaps that wasn't always the case. clamav 0.92~dfsg-2~dapper1ubuntu0.2 (security) followed 0.92.1~dfsg2-1.1~dapper1 (updates). [16:30] rbasak: let me konw if you want to do a hangout today, i know it's getting (is) late your time [16:35] can anyone help me port forward. i have port 80 forwarded on a PK5000 but the online port checker says it port 80 ist still closed [16:43] jamespage, qemu - 1:2.2+dfsg-5expubuntu9.7~cloud4 is ready to promote to kilo-proposed [16:43] coreycb, \o/ - I'll do that now [16:44] coreycb, done [16:44] jamespage, thanks! [16:44] you'll need to manually handle in the bug unless you added it to the changelog [16:45] nacc: is now OK? [16:45] rbasak: sure [16:52] rbasak: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+publishinghistory?batch=75&direction=backwards&memo=525&start=450 [16:56] bugs are built in I reckon [16:57] bit like the law legal system and solicitors and future work [16:58] rbasak: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/0.92.1~dfsg2-1.1~dapper1 [16:58] rbasak: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/0.92~dfsg-2~dapper1ubuntu0.2 [17:06] http://pad.ubuntu.com/clamav-dapper [17:18] dapper? === degorenko is now known as _degorenko|afk [17:24] Dapper. [17:24] genii: crazy publishing history :) [17:54] Ubuntu can you stop the updates by hiring decent developers [17:54] especially server reboot needed ones [17:55] I don't even know how to respond to that. [17:56] synchronet: please remember: http://www.ubuntu.com/about/about-ubuntu/conduct [17:58] synchronet, why are you compaining about updates? [17:59] updates coming out often is a good thing [17:59] but maybe you mean security patches [18:00] though, dunno what ubuntu developers have to do with any of the above [18:05] patdk-wk: just tired I suppose [18:07] I'm not sure I follow [18:08] narrow mindedness is no excuse [18:59] how can I disable the fancy boot screen in ubuntu-server? I want to see the log [18:59] funny I was wondering about acquiring a fancy boot screen so as to *not* see the log [19:00] <\9> I was wondering today about having a fancy boot screen *with* the log [19:00] probably 'plymouth' is the answer to both questions :) [19:00] Lope: see /etc/default/grub and remove the 'splash quiet' [19:00] sarnold: ohai! [19:00] (or wherever thats at now) [19:00] morning teward :) [19:00] sling: thanks! [19:13] jamespage, neutron 2:8.1.0-0ubuntu0.16.04.2~cloud0 is ready to promote to mitaka-proposed [19:15] anyone in particular working on php7.0 package and updating to 7.0.7 from currently 7.0.4? [19:33] b4r: in which release? [19:33] uh [19:33] 16.04 [19:34] b4r: well, a SRU microrelease exception has been filed: LP: #1569609 [19:34] Launchpad bug 1569609 in php7.0 (Ubuntu) "[SRU] microrelease exception for src:php7.0" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1569609 [19:34] nacc: oh nice, are they filed usuallly on launchpad? I wouldn't mind attempting to keep up with this [19:34] if that were to be granted, we'd be able to update to 7.0.x [19:34] tbh it was more of a "woah they updated today and it's not in the repos" [19:34] b4r: until that happens though, we have to selectively backport [19:35] understood [19:35] b4r: well, no package gets updated just becuase upstream does, at least not automatically, in a released version [19:40] ... in fact it's fairly rare. firefox, chrome-browser, mysql / mariadb are the most common ones.. there's a few others that get it periodically but it's rare [19:40] sarnold: good point! [19:40] b4r: hence the explicit bug requesting it for php7.0 [21:17] hmm, what's the deal with mysql-server on xenial? dpkg-reconfigure used to prompt for setting the root password, but it doesn't do that in xenial anymore so my database has some root password that i didn't enter [21:17] (asked in #ubuntu, but this is a -server install so figured i would try here too) [21:18] i can obviously make it bypass the grant table and fix it, but i feel like i'm missing something or there is a bug here with the package [21:25] aha, this is a xenial change: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-mysql/mysql-5.7.git/tree/debian/NEWS?id=1025a9fa9c6c112913c59138db49dbc94891d20f [21:40] madwizard: did you see https://github.com/b333z/beadm? [22:01] hello I have a question about booting new nodes in MaaS 1.9 [22:02] on new nodes (non-ready) is there a way to force maas to repartition the disks? [22:03] that doesn't include me deleting/recreating the arrays on my storage controller? [22:52] i have port 8080 open in router but cannot connect to server. any ideas? [22:53] i can get the server by going localhost:8080 [22:53] notthistime: check netstat -lnp output, see what address the process it bound to [22:56] did netstat not sure what im looking for [22:57] if the local address looks like this: 127.0.0.1:2628 then it's not listening externally [22:57] 127.0.0.1:53 [22:57] if it looks like 0.0.0.0:22 or 192.168.122.1:53 then it is listening externally -- the first case, all interfaceds, the second case only that specific IP address [22:58] that's probably just a dns server :) look for :8000 [22:58] no 8000 [22:59] 8080 [22:59] listening on 8080 [22:59] notthistime: ok, look for 8080 :) [22:59] ah. apparently I'm getting old. [23:00] tcp6 0 0 :::8080 :::* LISTEN [23:00] im not sure what im looking for [23:01] that's an ipv6 address; did you let tcp6 port 8080 through as well? do you have an ipv6 address? should you configure your application to also listen on 0.0.0.0:8080 so it works on ipv4? [23:03] ipv6 was set to ignore. changed to DHCP [23:04] it works on 0.0.0.0:8080