| dpm | davidcalle, just passing on some additional feedback from jdstrand re: security whitepaper | 14:25 |
|---|---|---|
| dpm | "it looks really good. I noticed that 'Heading 4' and 'Heading 5' are hard to know which is which. See 'Snappy security technologies overview' (h4) compared to 'Traditional permissions' (h5). The h4 seems smaller due to the h5's bold | 14:25 |
| dpm | ie, 'Traditional permissions' should be a subsection of 'Snappy security technologies overview', but the bolding of the h5 makes it seem it is not" | 14:25 |
| davidcalle | That's right, moving all h5 to h6 fixes it, but there are a few h6 that would need to move to something else. Maybe simply a slightly bolder version of h6 for h5. | 14:35 |
| dpm | davidcalle, sorry, was otp. It seems that in the gdoc the difference between h4 and h5 is noticeable, but probably the site's CSS does some overriding to the gdoc styles. Or is it a matter of there being no style in the HTML and the Ubuntu guidelines not having a clear difference between <h4> and <h5>? | 15:16 |
| dpm | davidcalle, also, in terms of updating the online version, jdstrand told me if it could be a matter of 1) just doing the edits in gdoc 2) updating the version number 3) adding a comment with a "+david.calle" ping | 15:17 |
| dpm | I thought that could work, what do you think? | 15:18 |
| davidcalle | dpm: it's a matter of our CSS guidelines having a small hierarchy mismatch between h4 and h5 | 15:23 |
| davidcalle | For the update workflow, works for me | 15:23 |
| dpm | ok, cool | 16:08 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!