[08:15] <marcodamico> hi guys
[08:20] <marcodamico> I'm a PhD student in HPC/Resource Managers field at Barcelona Supercomputing Center, and I'm very interested in LXD, I would like to contribute in this project, putting my effort in an "HPC related" use of it
[08:31] <svij> marcodamico: I think #lxcontainers is the better place for that.
[08:31] <marcodamico> ok thank you
[13:54] <mhall119> bzoltan: Mirv: has anyone built qt from source as part of a snap? I need a good example to reuse
[15:20] <dpm> DanChapman, https://bugs.launchpad.net/dekko/+bug/1541856 \o/
[15:21] <dpm> looking forward to seeing that one released, good work :)
[15:26] <DanChapman> dpm, \o/ thanks :-)
[17:12] <bzoltan> mhall119:  I did
[17:13] <bzoltan> mhall119: http://people.canonical.com/~bzoltan/ubuntu-sdk-ide_0.18+snap1_amd64.snap Not much use, but it is there
[17:13] <bzoltan> mhall119:  I will produce up to date package soon because we have a new LXD based builder solution
[17:21] <mhall119> bzoltan: can I see your snapcraft.yaml for that? I want to try building Qt 5.6.1 for my Krita snap
[17:21] <bzoltan> mhall119:  nothing to see there ... I do it in a very different way.
[17:21] <mhall119> how do you do it?
[17:22] <bzoltan> mhall119: much simpler - http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bzoltan/ubuntu-sdk-ide-click/trunk/view/head:/click/snapcraft.yaml
[17:22] <bzoltan> mhall119:  since snapcraft does not support PPAs (as far as I know) I had to build the Qt before packing it up with snapcraft
[17:23] <mhall119> snapcraft can be made to support PPA, actually, its an environment variable or something
[17:23] <bzoltan> mhall119: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bzoltan/ubuntu-sdk-ide-click/trunk/view/head:/create-ubuntu-sdk-ide-click.py
[17:23] <bzoltan> mhall119: maybe... but I did not feel like hacking around when the copy plugin does all what I need
[17:24] <mhall119> bzoltan: so you're not building from upstream source?
[17:25] <bzoltan> mhall119: I can do that one too if I want, but not from the upstream git repo.. I have a personal mirror https://code.launchpad.net/~bzoltan/+junk/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-5.6.0
[17:26] <bzoltan> mhall119:  I prefer to use our own distributed Qt, it has all the backports, patches what we do need. The clear upstream Qt is not really good for most cases. It is good for demo and showing off, but running Unity8 and the whole platform we need the distro release.
[17:27] <mhall119> bzoltan: I would imagine upstream will be good enough to run Krita though
[17:28] <bzoltan> mhall119:  maybe.. but be prepared talking to the upstream if you hit any problems. Plus you need to lear how to build a functional Qt stack... what is far from trivial.
[17:29] <bzoltan> mhall119:  this is the most stripped down way to do - http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sdk-team/ubuntu-sdk-ide/trunk/files
[17:30] <bzoltan> mhall119:  but for real... it might thate a `git clone;make` to get binaries... but to get all what you will really need will take waaaaay much more.
[18:53] <mhall119> bzoltan: why is that?
[18:53] <mhall119> are there multiple source trees that need to be built?