[00:34] <dobey> ToyKeeper: it seems somehow that the u1 login window is opened behind the pay-ui window
[00:34] <ToyKeeper> dobey: Yes, that's how it appears.
[00:35] <dobey> ToyKeeper: this is probably an issue in online-accounts or mir
[00:35] <dobey> 2016-05-26 20:34:53,467 - WARNING - QWindow::fromWinId(): platform plugin does not support foreign windows.
[00:35] <ToyKeeper> dobey: Is it happening without the silo?
[00:36]  * ToyKeeper reflashes to check
[00:36] <dobey> ToyKeeper: yes
[00:36] <dobey> just tested on my mako
[00:37] <ToyKeeper> dobey: Do you know of a bug for it?  It'll have to be fixed before OTA12.
[00:38] <dobey> ToyKeeper: i don't know of any existing bug report for it, no
[00:39] <ToyKeeper> dobey: Okay, I'll make one and add you on it since it affects pay-ui.
[01:14] <ToyKeeper> dobey: Could you tag any projects you think are relevant?  https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1586219
[01:38] <dobey> ToyKeeper: added online-accounts as i think it's the most likely culprit (though i don't know what recent changes have been done otherwise to mir/etc…, for all i know, could be a bug in qt)
[01:38] <dobey> but hopefully mardy will see it in his morning, and figure something out
[10:11] <rvr> bzoltan: Silo 29 has no automated signoff now
[10:11] <rvr> Nor lander's
[12:09] <mterry_> robru, you around?  I need advice on a silo and its creation of uninstallable packages on arm64
[13:07] <awe> trainguards, can someone lend some assitance with https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1462
[13:07] <awe> ?
[13:19] <Mirv> awe: you probably want to put network-manager to the source packages field since it isn't MP based package
[13:21] <awe> thanks Mirv; also... this is the first multi-landing I've done for NM, but technically it's a dual landing to the PPA, and then I've submitted merge proposals separately for Y
[13:33] <Mirv> awe: ok. we can cope with special arrangements like that too.
[13:34] <awe> thanks Mirv
[13:34] <awe> I'll make sure to add a comment to the ticket with an explanation
[13:35] <awe> still have lots more testing to do...
[16:12] <robru> awe: any reason your gallery mp wouldn't work for xenial and vivid? That's a very strange arrangement
[16:13] <robru> Yakkety mp I mean
[16:19] <awe> gallery mp?
[16:20] <awe> robru, not sure what you mean?
[16:20] <awe> robru, I'll add a note to the silo explaining
[16:20] <awe> it's a long story...
[16:22] <awe> basically, we ended up with a new NM maintainer, who then switched from using bzr to git
[16:23] <awe> and I'd been focused on landing NM 1.2 final for the phone; so that's what I worked on first, and then also proposed the patches that made sense to Y
[16:24] <awe> once this landing is baked, I'll be working on upstreaming the bulk of our touch patches
[17:17] <robru> awe: I mean, you have a silo that's just yakkety based on MPs? I don't understand why you wouldn't just put that in a trio silo. I don't understand why you're releasing something different to yakkety than to xenial/vivid
[17:18] <awe> huh?
[17:18] <awe> robru, the silo has xenial & vivid packages only
[17:19] <robru> awe: "I've submitted merge proposals separately for Y" why are those merge proposals not in a silo.
[17:21] <awe> because it's not possible to have the same idential package across three releases, and I don't want to gate PPA landings on Y
[17:21] <awe> robru, if you'd like we do a quick hangout, and I can explain?
[17:23] <robru> awe: no I'd rather not do a hangout (not awake yet)
[17:24] <awe> ok; I'd rather we wait and discuss early next week.  It's a three day weekend and the last thing I want to do is re-evaulate how this landing is happening
[17:26] <awe> I'm working on figuring out a regression right now, and that's my most important task today
[17:31] <robru> awe: ok, sorry, I'm not trying to make extra work for you, I'm just trying to understand why this isn't landing the usual way
[17:32] <awe> because NM is a distro package, and unfortunately we can't have rhe exact same version of the package across three releases + form-factor
[17:33] <awe> we also have a new NM maintainer who's +12h from me
[17:34] <awe> I'd been just building vivid packages, and trying to keep in sync with cypgermox previously.
[17:35] <awe> anyways, the Y landing is missing a few patches that aren't applicable to desktop ( and or devices with old kernels, like most touch devices )
[17:36] <awe> yes, in an ideal world, it's be great to land all three versions together.  But as I can't even test most of my code on xenial or yakkety right now, that just doesn't make sense
[17:37] <awe> my goal now is a landing with zero regressions, and upstreaming as much of our patchset as possible once I'm done
[17:39] <robru> awe: ok, no worries. thanks for explaining
[17:40] <awe> np
[18:04] <dobey> mterry, kenvandine: can one of you publish https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1341 and ack the packaging changes please?
[18:10] <mterry> k
[18:14] <dobey> thanks
[21:18] <dobey> 46 h 19 min 57 s
[21:18] <dobey> i guess a test running that long is not good