[07:33] Hi everyone [07:33] I'm having issue with gtk 3 themes [07:33] On ubuntu Gnome 16.04 [07:33] http://prnt.sc/b5a5mh [07:33] These is how it seem when a theme different from Adwaita [07:34] Does anyone know what is the problem? === Inoki is now known as Inoki_away [11:23] ricotz, any thoughs on best place to pull in xserver-xorg-input-libinput from? seed or mutter [11:27] darkxst, the seed -- are there really packages pulling in specific driver packages? [11:27] well no, but we can't do that on X packages [11:28] and 3.20 remove synaptics/evdev backend [11:30] as said then ubuntu-gnome-desktop should manage that imo [11:31] although I could see having libinput recommending/suggesting the driver too [11:31] ricotz, that won't fly while unity7 doesnt have full libinput support [11:32] seems to be a question for tjaalton [11:32] oh, does unity7 break if the driver is present? [11:32] installing libinput for example will break u-c-c input settings [11:34] there will possibly also be side-effects in unity itself, although nothing completely broken [11:34] hmm, I see [11:35] oh, I didn't have input-libinput installed here [11:37] (not really needed on this system without any touchpads) [11:38] yeh the "disable touchpad while typing" is the most annoying sympton [11:42] ricotz, don't know if I really want to fork the xenial seed just for the ppa! [11:48] darkxst, so you want a hacky solution [11:48] e.g. as said either libinput or libmutter would need to recommend it [11:49] I will seed it for Y [11:49] btw, pushing gtk+ 3.21.2 to staging [11:49] it doesnt break anything more? [11:50] (still without debian's package split) [11:50] are there known breakages? [11:50] no, I have not tested 3.21 at all yet though [11:51] it was just released [11:51] I didnt dare to push 3.21.1 though [11:51] I know that, what I mean is I havent had time to follow dev branches [11:52] yakkety/staging is for the brave ones again [11:53] afaik there is nothing scaring, gsk wasnt merged yet [11:53] ok [11:53] yeh all the scary stuff lands in .90 :p [11:54] haha, as usual, these *small* last minute changes [11:54] anyhow, just wanted to it in to not block other app update which might require it already [11:54] it/get [11:56] ok, xenial/staging is sufficent for what is actually going into yakkety proper I guess [12:02] afaics gtk+ 3.20 won't land so soon [12:03] in the archive, e.g. issues with Ambiance/Radiance and firefox [12:04] grr, why is it "adwaita-icon-theme - 3.20-1ubuntu1~xenial1" and not "3.20.0-1ubuntu1~xenial1" [12:05] look at the debian version! [12:06] yeah, upstream did it "wrong" or at least not as usual [12:07] yeh ubuntu themes will take a lot of work, and now larsu has left there is no one to work on it [12:08] Laney is looking into it [12:08] ok [12:09] last I heard they were hoping to backport changes from ubuntu MATE (which aren't done yet either) [12:10] right, flexiondotorg is helping out with it as well [13:20] ricotz: the Firefox issue is easy [13:20] jbicha, not really [13:23] ricotz: I thought I fixed it for xenial? firefox needs to be re-uploaded for yakkety users with a higher version number [13:23] debuild -S on firefox was giving me problems so I hadn't done it yet [13:29] jbicha, I honestly didn't run the "fixed" version, but does it really fix scrollbar, checkboxes, textfields? [13:30] jbicha, regarding debuild, yeah, something in dpkg 1.18.7 broke the packaging [13:30] yes, other distros like Arch & Fedora development backported the fix from Firefox trunk [13:31] it worked fine here for the week or so that it had a higher version number than what was in yakkety [13:32] I see, also 47 won't fix this either, 48 will finally work out-of-the-box [13:33] I can repack 46 and upload if needed [13:42] yes please, I still use Firefox as my primary browser [14:10] hi guys [14:11] any1 using ubuntu-gnome on a laptop? [14:11] https://askubuntu.com/questions/776454/how-do-i-disable-automatic-brightness-in-ubuntu-gnome-16-04-15-10 [14:11] could some1 help me with that [14:20] jbicha, pushed [14:24] is that fixed in 16.10 versions atlest? [14:24] atleast* [19:34] ricotz: thank you :) [20:08] :( [20:08] help me please