[00:05] <wgrant> stgraber: Did the revert actually cause problems? Why did your machines care? The previous version was restored in the bad version's place, so it should only have prevented installations of exact versioned dependencies.
[00:09] <stgraber> wgrant: I have a nagios check on all systems I managed which triggers if I have packages that are installed from an unknown source
[00:10] <stgraber> wgrant: it usually indicates somebody screwed something up in the archive :)
[00:10] <wgrant> Ah
[00:10] <wgrant> Well in this case it indicated that you had a bad update, so working as intended.
[00:44] <slangasek> hrm
[00:44] <slangasek> where is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/yakkety/arm64/inkscape/0.91-8ubuntu2 ?
[00:45] <slangasek> y
[05:49] <slangasek> have done some analysis on the gdal+poppler transition; pdf2htmlex needs a fix for an s390x build failure, inkscape I've reuploaded to correct the awol arm64 build, libreoffice has a FTBFS that needs sorted, and libgdcm-tools is broken upstream and will need removed or its uninstallability ignored
[10:06] <tjaalton> mdeslaur: hi, shouldn't bug 1574727 have efibootmgr instead of efivar? or both?
[11:05] <mdeslaur> tjaalton: I'm not sure... cyphermox ^
[11:06] <tjaalton> mdeslaur: the queue only has efibootmgr but the bug doesn't mention it
[11:06] <tjaalton> as being affected
[14:07] <cyphermox> tjaalton: indeed, it should have efibootmgr too, sorry. I found that out while testing -- the new efivar breaks the old efibootmgr
[14:07] <tjaalton> cyphermox: heh, ok
[15:04] <ginggs> michi: hi, would you have a look at the ftbfs in thumbnailer, please? i think it might be similar to failure in
[15:04] <ginggs> persistent-cache-cpp
[15:39] <bdmurray> slangasek: I'll be doing some more SRU reviews today as I'm still working on some tool changes to add release tasks to bugs, so feel free to skip your shift.
[15:54] <slangasek> bdmurray: got it, thanks
[16:10] <bdmurray> coreycb: With regards to your comment in bug 1546116 - what will the Liberty cloud archive do once Wily is EoL?
[16:13] <coreycb> bdmurray, once wily is EOL we will have to backport fixes directly to the cloud archive, but for now we go to wily, then backport to trusty-liberty
[17:38] <sergiusens> arges hey, I know it's not your turn today, but any idea how long until snapcraft gets out of -proposed?
[17:38] <sergiusens> asking in case I am missing a step
[17:38] <arges> sergiusens: typically we try to avoid releasing on fridays unless its an emergency
[17:39] <sergiusens> arges ok, so we are all set for a Monday release? As in, do I need to do anything or will it all happen on its own?
[17:39] <arges> sergiusens: everything is verified LGTM
[17:40] <sergiusens> thanks
[17:41] <arges> sergiusens: also i won't be in on monday, but you can check the sru team member in the wiki for their day
[17:41] <sergiusens> arges sounds good.
[17:55] <infinity> I'll be around.  It'll escape on Monday.
[17:56] <infinity> (Though, given the tiny current userbase of snapd, if there is an urgent need for promotion, I'd consider it)
[23:01] <michi> ginggs: Just saw your ping. I’m about to leave, but can look at it later today. (It’s Sat here.) Do you have a build log link?