| tvoss | trainguards, I could use some help with the loc-service build failure in https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1451 | 07:33 |
|---|---|---|
| dbarth | mardy: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/yakkety/landing-022/excuses.html | 07:43 |
| Mirv | tvoss: powerpc build rerunning in case that "delayed_service_test" xenial failure was random flakiness | 07:52 |
| tvoss | Mirv, what about "PPA/bzr version mismatch (location-service/yakkety)." | 07:53 |
| === dpm is now known as dpm-afk | ||
| Mirv | rvr: jibel: ok I've found something more to try with silo 009 from upstream git, so I will rebuild the silo | 10:39 |
| rvr | Mirv: Ok | 10:41 |
| dbarth | trainguards, hey guys, silo 22 seems to be stuck with a yaketty test failure which seems odd: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/yakkety/landing-022/excuses.html | 12:03 |
| dbarth | or qa actually ^^ what do you guys recommend to consider the silo for testing? | 12:04 |
| Mirv | dbarth: there seems to have been lxc problem when running the autopkgtest. rerunning, check again in 1h. | 12:09 |
| dbarth | Mirv: ok, thanks! | 12:15 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| pstolowski | trainguards, hey, may I ask for removal of media-hub from silo 65? | 12:24 |
| Mirv | pstolowski: done | 12:25 |
| pstolowski | Mirv, thanks! | 12:27 |
| bzoltan | rvr: finnaly the sil29 is all good https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1443 | 12:32 |
| rvr | bzoltan: Wow, good | 12:32 |
| rvr | bzoltan: No code changes, right? | 12:32 |
| rvr | cimi: ping | 12:34 |
| bzoltan | rvr: no, nothing changed since you have reviewed | 12:35 |
| bzoltan | rvr: as you see the branch https://code.launchpad.net/~bzoltan/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/OTA12-2016-05-20/+merge/295351 | 12:35 |
| rvr | Saviq: cimi: I may have a spotted a problem editing app reviews with silo 59. After tapping on the Send button it doesn't save (or close). | 12:36 |
| rvr | bzoltan: Thanks, approving it | 12:36 |
| bzoltan | rvr: \o/ | 12:36 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, ↑↑ can you have a look at rvr's trouble with app reviews in silo 59 please | 13:06 |
| tsdgeos | rvr: did you type something? | 13:06 |
| rvr | tsdgeos: Yeah | 13:37 |
| tsdgeos | that's confusing | 13:37 |
| tsdgeos | we didn't change anything there | 13:37 |
| tsdgeos | only how the ui is layouted | 13:38 |
| rvr | tsdgeos: I have a video, let me see | 13:38 |
| rvr | tsdgeos: https://private-fileshare.canonical.com/~vrruiz/app-reviews-save.mp4 | 13:40 |
| tsdgeos | rvr: in meeting, will be back | 13:48 |
| rvr | tsdgeos: Ack | 13:48 |
| Saviq | rvr, 403 Forbidden | 13:53 |
| tsdgeos | rvr: yeah same here | 13:53 |
| rvr | Let me fix that | 13:53 |
| rvr | tsdgeos: Saviq: Now? | 13:54 |
| Saviq | rvr, yup | 13:54 |
| tsdgeos | that's bad | 13:55 |
| Saviq | rvr, so it actually submits the review, but there's no UI feedback? | 13:55 |
| tsdgeos | but i don't think our changes should have any influence here | 13:55 |
| tsdgeos | rvr: have you tried without the silo? | 13:55 |
| rvr | Saviq: There is feedback when I submitted the review, but editing it leads to that | 13:55 |
| rvr | tsdgeos: I am trying but just run out of battery in that device | 13:56 |
| Saviq | rvr, yeah but I mean that the new text is visible after you scrolled around | 13:56 |
| Saviq | so the review got edited? | 13:56 |
| tsdgeos | i think this is an "existing" bug | 13:56 |
| tsdgeos | since i can reproduce it without the silo | 13:56 |
| tsdgeos | probably triggered by pstolowski's work on reusing the previews | 13:56 |
| tsdgeos | pstolowski: invoke! | 13:57 |
| tsdgeos | probably not on his side though | 13:57 |
| tsdgeos | now that i think about it | 13:57 |
| Saviq | yeah we should collapse regardless | 13:57 |
| tsdgeos | we just forgot to test/fix that on our side when the preview reuse happened | 13:57 |
| tsdgeos | rvr: anyway, my "excuses" for landing are "this is not new, it happens, so should not block the silo", but should open a bug | 13:58 |
| tsdgeos | rvr: if you could confirm what i say is not a lie, it'd be great :D | 13:58 |
| rvr | tsdgeos: Yeah, I'm checking :) | 13:58 |
| rvr | After confirming it's not a regression, I will continue checking the silo changes | 13:59 |
| pstolowski | tsdgeos, yeah probably related to preview updates.. isn't it an issue with yet another widget not noticing changes (you fixed two of those already when I worked on this) | 13:59 |
| Trevinho | robru: hey, look at this generated changelog: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_39a8dbb93caf4ec889f8a1b7f69885db/bileto-1481/2016-05-30_13:53:17/yakkety/compiz/packaging_changes.diff (http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/16835002/). There's something weird with parsing this commit msg | 14:00 |
| Trevinho | https://code.launchpad.net/~smspillaz/compiz/compiz.simple-animations-returns/+merge/295533 | 14:00 |
| tsdgeos | pstolowski: yeah it's probably on my side | 14:00 |
| tsdgeos | s/my/our/unity8's | 14:00 |
| tsdgeos | rvr: if that0s the case will you also report a bug plz? | 14:00 |
| rvr | tsdgeos: Yeah, already on it | 14:01 |
| tsdgeos | awesome | 14:02 |
| === dpm-afk is now known as dpm | ||
| rvr | tsdgeos: Finally. Confirmed that it is not a regression | 14:58 |
| rvr | I filled the bug here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scope-click/+bug/1587097 | 14:59 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1587097 in unity-scope-click (Ubuntu) "No UI feedback after saving a review change" [Undecided,New] | 15:00 |
| tsdgeos | rvr: thanks | 15:01 |
| === sil2100_ is now known as sil2100 | ||
| robru | Trevinho: yeah that's a known bug, don't worry, the giant rollout I'm doing this week will fix that. | 15:18 |
| Trevinho | robru: nice | 15:19 |
| robru | tvoss: typically ppa/bzr version mismatch is just a momentary hiccup but seeing as your ticket has been in that state for a while it might need a rebuild to fix. Will dig a bit more | 15:19 |
| robru | tvoss: yeah apparently the last time you built location service it failed to actually upload in the ppa, check the version number there. You'll need to rebuild | 15:25 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| rvr | tsdgeos: Can the horizontal and vertical maximizes be manually triggered? | 16:19 |
| rvr | Right click on the maximize button -> horizontal | 16:23 |
| rvr | Middle click -> vertical | 16:24 |
| sil2100 | robru: hey! I suppose no internal meeting today since the US have a national holiday? | 17:03 |
| robru | sil2100: yeah | 17:03 |
| robru | sil2100: I'm trying to arrange a train rollout for tonight or tomorrow, hopefully disruption will be minimal. | 17:03 |
| robru | that's all I have to say | 17:03 |
| sil2100 | robru: ok, good from my POV - what changes will you be deploying with this rollout? | 17:04 |
| robru | sil2100: this is the big one -- parallelized builds in bileto. | 17:05 |
| sil2100 | Niice | 17:05 |
| sil2100 | The timing is good now as well, since we have still some time until the OTA-12 deadlines | 17:06 |
| robru | sil2100: great, I was hoping it'd work out like htat | 17:06 |
| sil2100 | So yeah, just give me a heads up once it's deployed | 17:06 |
| robru | sil2100: yeah I'm just trying to schedule it with IS, they're being a bit unresponsive. | 17:07 |
| bzoltan | zbenjamin: ^ | 17:21 |
| robru | wat | 19:21 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!