[07:33] <tvoss> trainguards, I could use some help with the loc-service build failure in https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1451
[07:43] <dbarth> mardy: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/yakkety/landing-022/excuses.html
[07:52] <Mirv> tvoss: powerpc build rerunning in case that "delayed_service_test" xenial failure was random flakiness
[07:53] <tvoss> Mirv, what about "PPA/bzr version mismatch (location-service/yakkety)."
[10:39] <Mirv> rvr: jibel: ok I've found something more to try with silo 009 from upstream git, so I will rebuild the silo
[10:41] <rvr> Mirv: Ok
[12:03] <dbarth> trainguards, hey guys, silo 22 seems to be stuck with a yaketty test failure which seems odd: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/yakkety/landing-022/excuses.html
[12:04] <dbarth> or qa actually ^^ what do you guys recommend to consider the silo for testing?
[12:09] <Mirv> dbarth: there seems to have been lxc problem when running the autopkgtest. rerunning, check again in 1h.
[12:15] <dbarth> Mirv: ok, thanks!
[12:24] <pstolowski> trainguards, hey, may I ask for removal of media-hub from silo 65?
[12:25] <Mirv> pstolowski: done
[12:27] <pstolowski> Mirv, thanks!
[12:32] <bzoltan> rvr: finnaly the sil29 is all good https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1443
[12:32] <rvr> bzoltan: Wow, good
[12:32] <rvr> bzoltan: No code changes, right?
[12:34] <rvr> cimi: ping
[12:35] <bzoltan> rvr:  no, nothing changed since you have reviewed
[12:35] <bzoltan> rvr:  as you see the branch https://code.launchpad.net/~bzoltan/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/OTA12-2016-05-20/+merge/295351
[12:36] <rvr> Saviq: cimi: I may have a spotted a problem editing app reviews with silo 59. After tapping on the Send button it doesn't save (or close).
[12:36] <rvr> bzoltan: Thanks, approving it
[12:36] <bzoltan> rvr: \o/
[13:06] <Saviq> tsdgeos, ↑↑ can you have a look at rvr's trouble with app reviews in silo 59 please
[13:06] <tsdgeos> rvr: did you type something?
[13:37] <rvr> tsdgeos: Yeah
[13:37] <tsdgeos> that's confusing
[13:37] <tsdgeos> we didn't change anything there
[13:38] <tsdgeos> only how the ui is layouted
[13:38] <rvr> tsdgeos: I have a video, let me see
[13:40] <rvr> tsdgeos: https://private-fileshare.canonical.com/~vrruiz/app-reviews-save.mp4
[13:48] <tsdgeos> rvr: in meeting, will be back
[13:48] <rvr> tsdgeos: Ack
[13:53] <Saviq> rvr, 403 Forbidden
[13:53] <tsdgeos> rvr: yeah same here
[13:53] <rvr> Let me fix that
[13:54] <rvr> tsdgeos: Saviq: Now?
[13:54] <Saviq> rvr, yup
[13:55] <tsdgeos> that's bad
[13:55] <Saviq> rvr, so it actually submits the review, but there's no UI feedback?
[13:55] <tsdgeos> but i don't think our changes should have any influence here
[13:55] <tsdgeos> rvr: have you tried without the silo?
[13:55] <rvr> Saviq: There is feedback when I submitted the review, but editing it leads to that
[13:56] <rvr> tsdgeos: I am trying but just run out of battery in that device
[13:56] <Saviq> rvr, yeah but I mean that the new text is visible after you scrolled around
[13:56] <Saviq> so the review got edited?
[13:56] <tsdgeos> i think this is an "existing" bug
[13:56] <tsdgeos> since i can reproduce it without the silo
[13:56] <tsdgeos> probably triggered by pstolowski's work on reusing the previews
[13:57] <tsdgeos> pstolowski: invoke!
[13:57] <tsdgeos> probably not on his side though
[13:57] <tsdgeos> now that i think about it
[13:57] <Saviq> yeah we should collapse regardless
[13:57] <tsdgeos> we just forgot to test/fix that on our side when the preview reuse happened
[13:58] <tsdgeos> rvr: anyway, my "excuses" for landing are "this is not new, it happens, so should not block the silo", but should open a bug
[13:58] <tsdgeos> rvr: if you could confirm what i say is not a lie, it'd be great :D
[13:58] <rvr> tsdgeos: Yeah, I'm checking :)
[13:59] <rvr> After confirming it's not a regression, I will continue checking the silo changes
[13:59] <pstolowski> tsdgeos, yeah probably related to preview updates.. isn't it an issue with yet another widget not noticing changes (you fixed two of those already when I worked on this)
[14:00] <Trevinho> robru: hey, look at this generated changelog: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_39a8dbb93caf4ec889f8a1b7f69885db/bileto-1481/2016-05-30_13:53:17/yakkety/compiz/packaging_changes.diff (http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/16835002/). There's something weird with parsing this commit msg
[14:00] <Trevinho> https://code.launchpad.net/~smspillaz/compiz/compiz.simple-animations-returns/+merge/295533
[14:00] <tsdgeos> pstolowski: yeah it's probably on my side
[14:00] <tsdgeos> s/my/our/unity8's
[14:00] <tsdgeos> rvr: if that0s the case will you also report a bug plz?
[14:01] <rvr> tsdgeos: Yeah, already on it
[14:02] <tsdgeos> awesome
[14:58] <rvr> tsdgeos: Finally. Confirmed that it is not a regression
[14:59] <rvr> I filled the bug here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scope-click/+bug/1587097
[15:01] <tsdgeos> rvr: thanks
[15:18] <robru> Trevinho: yeah that's a known bug, don't worry, the giant rollout I'm doing this week will fix that.
[15:19] <Trevinho> robru: nice
[15:19] <robru> tvoss: typically ppa/bzr version mismatch is just a momentary hiccup but seeing as your ticket has been in that state for a while it might need a rebuild to fix. Will dig a bit more
[15:25] <robru> tvoss: yeah apparently the last time you built location service it failed to actually upload in the ppa, check the version number there. You'll need to rebuild
[16:19] <rvr> tsdgeos: Can the horizontal and vertical maximizes be manually triggered?
[16:23] <rvr> Right click on the maximize button -> horizontal
[16:24] <rvr> Middle click -> vertical
[17:03] <sil2100> robru: hey! I suppose no internal meeting today since the US have a national holiday?
[17:03] <robru> sil2100: yeah
[17:03] <robru> sil2100: I'm trying to arrange a train rollout for tonight or tomorrow, hopefully disruption will be minimal.
[17:03] <robru> that's all I have to say
[17:04] <sil2100> robru: ok, good from my POV - what changes will you be deploying with this rollout?
[17:05] <robru> sil2100: this is the big one -- parallelized builds in bileto.
[17:05] <sil2100> Niice
[17:06] <sil2100> The timing is good now as well, since we have still some time until the OTA-12 deadlines
[17:06] <robru> sil2100: great, I was hoping it'd work out like htat
[17:06] <sil2100> So yeah, just give me a heads up once it's deployed
[17:07] <robru> sil2100: yeah I'm just trying to schedule it with IS, they're being a bit unresponsive.
[17:21] <bzoltan> zbenjamin: ^
[19:21] <robru> wat