[08:46] <LocutusOfBorg> hi, if an archive admin is available, I would like to discuss and ask removals for libpng/vtk/insighttoolkit, all already gone from Debian
[08:47] <LocutusOfBorg> they should just break a couple of packages or arch to go away
[09:19] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: Try again when you don't have to add that qualifier.
[09:19] <michi> ginggs: thumbnailer is building in silo 8 with the copyright test fix.
[09:21] <mapreri> LocutusOfBorg: yeah, i'm not aware of any instance of "should just break a couple of packages" in ubuntu.  but probably they should just be removed as well?
[09:21] <mapreri> (except in way more rare circumstances, like on of the last perl upgrades, iirc)
[09:22] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, e.g. libpng can be removed without any issues
[09:23] <LocutusOfBorg> but I can't be sure, because I don't know how to ask dak
[09:23] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: Not so.
[09:23] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: reverse-depends src:libpng; reverse-depends -b src:libpng
[09:24] <LocutusOfBorg> this is interesting
[09:24] <LocutusOfBorg> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/libpng.html
[09:24] <cjwatson> *shrug*
[09:24] <LocutusOfBorg> why they are green then?
[09:25] <cjwatson> Sometimes there are slight discrepancies or the tracker conditions aren't quite right or something
[09:25] <cjwatson> In any event you can't rely solely on transition trackers for removals
[09:25] <LocutusOfBorg> at least I have some work to do, thanks
[09:25] <cjwatson> (Also the tracker doesn't tend to consider Build-Depends)
[09:36] <ginggs> michi: thanks!
[09:36] <michi> ginggs: No problem. Thanks for letting me know. I wish licensecheck wouldn’t change behavior with every new release :(
[10:03] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm I can't understand why gemrb is not migrating...
[10:04] <LocutusOfBorg> gemrb/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: gemrb-data (= 0.8.4-1)
[10:04] <LocutusOfBorg> but what?
[10:04] <LocutusOfBorg> oh multiverse vs universe mismatch? how to fix that?
[10:36] <michi> ginggs: did you push a change to trunk for thumbnailer? My silo build just failed because of a missing changelog entry.
[10:36] <ginggs> michi: not me
[10:36] <michi> OK, thanks!
[10:37] <ginggs> probably this https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thumbnailer/2.4+16.04.20160321-0ubuntu2
[10:37] <michi> Looking...
[10:37] <michi> Christ… :(
[10:37] <michi> This really stuffs us up something majorly each and every time.
[10:39] <michi> doko: Can you please refrain from push to our trunk without telling us?
[10:39] <michi> It breaks our silo builds every time someone does that.
[10:39] <michi> It’s OK to do this to keep stuff moving, but not without telling us.
[11:33] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: I've moved gemrb's binaries to multiverse.
[11:39] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[11:47] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, should libpgplot-perl have the same faith? (pgplot5 is in multiverse)
[11:50] <LocutusOfBorg> BTW almost all the packages shown with reverse-depends have a control file "libpng-dev | libpng12-dev", so I guess there is no need to patch them
[15:36] <maxiberta> hi. Looks like https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS is outdated; should include xenial at least in that time chart?
[18:02] <sergiusens> infinity hey, arges told me snapcraft in xenial-proposed should be good to go and to ping the right guy on the SRU list on Monday. I guess that's you (from the wiki at least)
[18:02] <sergiusens> any chance it can get the last ack?
[19:41] <infinity> sergiusens: That was snapd, not snapcraft, but I can do both.
[19:42] <sergiusens> infinity heh not sure what went on with snapd, but ok ;-)