| cjwatson | Could somebody have a look at python-libnacl and pymacaroons in xenial-proposed NEW for me, please? | 11:28 |
|---|---|---|
| === seb128_ is now known as seb128 | ||
| Laney | bah, thought that worked for channel notices | 13:25 |
| Laney | stgraber: ^- | 13:25 |
| stgraber | Laney: looking | 13:51 |
| stgraber | Laney: why the +b though, just kicking it would have been enough | 13:51 |
| stgraber | Laney: now I've got to unban it and restart it again | 13:51 |
| Laney | I thought that +b was enough to mute it | 13:52 |
| Laney | should have removed it when that didn't work | 13:52 |
| Laney | soz | 13:52 |
| stgraber | nah, +b only applies at join time I think | 13:52 |
| Laney | I think it applies to real messages | 13:53 |
| Laney | at least on some ircds it does | 13:53 |
| Laney | testy mctestface | 13:54 |
| cyphermox | nah, b just means you can't get back in | 13:55 |
| cyphermox | you want +q | 13:56 |
| cyphermox | (to mute someone) | 13:56 |
| Laney | :) | 14:01 |
| Laney | Depends what other modes are in effect; by default +b stops you from speaking but it's overridden by various things | 14:02 |
| * Laney just wasted time checking | 14:02 | |
| apw | stgraber, Laney ^ | 17:06 |
| stgraber | gah | 17:09 |
| stgraber | it's lplib blowing up by the looks of it but I'm not sure why exactly | 17:10 |
| stgraber | restarted with added logging, so if it happens again I should be able to track exactly what's making it unhappy | 17:11 |
| stgraber | that bit of code hasn't changed in over a year, so my guess is that there's something slightly different on LP which is confusing it | 17:11 |
| slangasek | hmm. why was cgmanager demoted in yakkety? | 18:55 |
| * slangasek undoes the demotion | 18:58 | |
| seb128 | would be nice to have launchpad records of who is doing those | 19:04 |
| slangasek | certainly would | 19:07 |
| slangasek | would also be nice to know why a package is being demoted in contradiction with component-mismatches | 19:08 |
| slangasek | And did something change recently to put the ubuntu-touch seed in main? It's good to have that fixed, but I remember there actually being quite a bit more delta of ubuntu-touch packages not yet in main than what I'm seeing now | 19:10 |
| seb128 | there is probably quite a stack still | 19:11 |
| slangasek | seb128: not according to http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches | 19:12 |
| seb128 | weird | 19:12 |
| slangasek | so I wonder if someone has batch-promoted things | 19:12 |
| seb128 | http://paste.ubuntu.com/16735785/ is the list of packages used by the unity8 desktop session (not including recommends) that needs to be promoted | 19:13 |
| slangasek | hmm | 19:13 |
| seb128 | the touch seed for sure needs a good part of those | 19:13 |
| seb128 | that list is from friday | 19:13 |
| slangasek | ok, so I'm not sure why ubuntu-app-launch is in main at all then; unless c-m is just confused because it /is/ in main, and therefore thinking gir1.2-ubuntu-app-launch-2 is a reason to keep it in main? (Because Extra-Include: gir1.2-*) | 19:18 |
| seb128 | slangasek, I promoted u-a-l earlier because indicator-datetime depends on its lib and that was blocking the libical transition, and u-a-l was in main in wily | 19:28 |
| slangasek | ah | 19:28 |
| seb128 | seems that has worked, libical migrated ;-) | 19:29 |
| seb128 | though I'm not sure I understand your comment, is that on the demotion list? | 19:29 |
| slangasek | makes perfect sense, but somehow 'reverse-depends' and 'seeded-in-ubuntu' aren't telling me this... guess it's a timing issue | 19:30 |
| slangasek | seb128: no, the other binaries were in the promotion list and I couldn't figure out why | 19:30 |
| seb128 | k | 19:30 |
| seb128 | I just promoted the binary that was needed | 19:30 |
| slangasek | now it makes sense, but it's still an MIR issue because ubuntu-app-launch has new dependencies since the last time it was in main | 19:30 |
| seb128 | oh :-/ | 19:31 |
| seb128 | which ones? | 19:31 |
| slangasek | ust, liburcu, libertine | 19:31 |
| seb128 | sorry I overlooked that | 19:31 |
| slangasek | so this probably breaks image builds until it's resolved? | 19:33 |
| seb128 | :-/ | 19:33 |
| seb128 | so britney just look at direct depends? | 19:34 |
| seb128 | indicator-datetime was not installable because of libubuntu-app-launcher missing | 19:34 |
| seb128 | but promoting it unblocked the transition even if it's un-installable in main | 19:34 |
| slangasek | yes, britney probably doesn't try to figure out recursive installability in main, just whether the direct deps are satisfied | 19:35 |
| slangasek | xnox: ^^ is that true? | 19:35 |
| seb128 | well, those eventually needed to be MIRed, so we just need to push people to file those requests now | 19:35 |
| seb128 | sorry about that | 19:35 |
| slangasek | ust, liburcu were previously in main also, so we can repromote | 19:37 |
| slangasek | libertine is new, I think | 19:37 |
| slangasek | I'll do the repromotion of ust,liburcu | 19:37 |
| seb128 | thanks | 19:42 |
| seb128 | tedg, ^ can you MIR the new depends? | 19:42 |
| tedg | Ah, sure, I may harass people to do them for me :-) | 19:43 |
| tedg | So reading the back log? Do I need a MIR for UAL? | 19:47 |
| tedg | It was next on my TODO, but if I can avoid that one, I'd be happy :-) | 19:47 |
| slangasek | tedg: only for libertine; with some urgency because the desktop image now has unsatisfiable-in-main deps | 19:52 |
| tedg | slangasek: Yeah, talking with ChrisTownsend about it now | 19:55 |
| tedg | slangasek: We have a question about splitting up a package between main and universe | 19:55 |
| tedg | slangasek: Libertine has a module it builds that has a lot of chroot deps that is a Suggests in the end for the main package. | 19:55 |
| tedg | slangasek: Can the source be in main and a binary in universe? | 19:55 |
| tedg | (one of the binaries) | 19:56 |
| doko | tedg, yes | 19:59 |
| ChrisTownsend | Ok, afaict, only python3-libertine-chroot has dependencies in universe all other binary packages have dependencies in main. | 20:00 |
| ChrisTownsend | doko: Do I make a note in the MIR for libertine that python3-libertine-chroot will stay in universe and all other binary packages are eligible for main? | 20:04 |
| slangasek | tedg, ChrisTownsend: no need to mention it at all; http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches already directs us to DTRT | 20:04 |
| slangasek | (and shows that python3-libertine-chroot is not a candidate for promotion) | 20:04 |
| ChrisTownsend | slangasek: Ah, cool, ok | 20:04 |
| ginggs | infinity (or anyone else), what can be done about LP: #1562480 ? Can fpc powerpc be removed in xenial and yakkety? it is not installable anyway | 20:17 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1562480 in glibc (Ubuntu) "fp-compiler not installable on powerpc since glibc 2.23" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1562480 | 20:17 |
| ChrisTownsend | slangasek: tedg: I believe this is what is needed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libertine/+bug/1588050 | 20:18 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1588050 in libertine (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libertine" [Undecided,New] | 20:18 |
| tedg | Thanks ChrisTownsend ! | 20:19 |
| ChrisTownsend | tedg: You're welcome | 20:19 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!