[07:35] <KNRO_> Any problems with amd64 and i386 farms?
[07:36] <wgrant> KNRO_: Indeed, fixing.
[07:36] <KNRO_> wgrant: thanks!
[10:04] <Odd_Bloke> We're seeing long waits for Intel builds to get queued; is there an issue with the builders?  (Or are they working through a backlog because of an issue?)
[10:08] <wgrant> Odd_Bloke: There was a bug earlier that caused a big backlog. It's catching up.
[10:11] <Odd_Bloke> wgrant: Okie doke, thanks. :)
[21:11] <elopio> Hello, anybody around to help me?
[21:11] <elopio> I can't target snapcraft bugs to xenial. I think that it might be because in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapcraft the maintainer is snappy-devel, who doesn't exist. It should be snappy-dev.
[21:19] <dobey> elopio: that "Maintainer" is just a reflection of the "Maintainer" field in debian/control. i don't think it has any relevance to who can manage bugs. the problem is you don't have permissions to accept bugs in ubuntu. you can only nominate them to be targeted
[21:20] <dobey> elopio: you should ask for help in #ubuntu-bugs i guess
[21:21] <elopio> dobey: mmm, that sounds like a better clue. /me walks to the next channel.
[21:21] <elopio> thanks!
[21:21] <dobey> sure
[23:56] <Fuzai> Hi there, I was told this might be the place for my question.  I'm wondering what it takes to fork a ppa and setup a build process for that ppa?  The ppa I'm referencing has it's source and binaries for amd64 and i386, but I'm wanting to compile for armhf, specifically K1 Tegra.  Thanks in advance.
[23:58] <nacc> Fuzai: you can copy packages from ppas, i think, generally
[23:58] <nacc> Fuzai: you would specify in your ppa that you want to build for armhf; however i think access to the armhf builders is not generically available
[23:59] <Fuzai> So what's it take to either cross compile it myself, or run it from the board I have in the first place?