| flocculant | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/seeds/xubuntu.yakkety/blacklist | 07:27 |
|---|---|---|
| flocculant | if that says "# Xubuntu doesn't need GNOME's user guide." why do we get it, if we get via some other thing - should it be blacklisted? | 07:29 |
| Unit193 | Not how that blacklist works. :/ | 08:18 |
| flocculant | Unit193: awesome :p | 11:37 |
| flocculant | a whitelisting blacklist :D | 11:37 |
| knome | flocculant, qa status going to be broken for a bit while i add the new functionality | 11:42 |
| flocculant | knome: is a bit hours, days, weeks ? | 11:43 |
| knome | minutes :P | 11:43 |
| flocculant | :D | 11:43 |
| flocculant | knome: well you understood exactly what I meant yesterday :p | 11:55 |
| flocculant | when you've finished sorting it can you leave Boot Status as both wins and 64 bit install as fail and 32 bit as unconfirmed :) | 11:56 |
| knome | k | 12:00 |
| flocculant | I'm off now - cya later | 12:01 |
| akxwi-dave | laters | 12:02 |
| knome | flocculant, ok, i've set the statuses you asked for and everything should work as expected; if not, poke | 12:43 |
| akxwi-dave | flocculant, knome, I can confirm the 32 bit version fails with same problems as the 64bit on ubi-console and installer crash | 13:17 |
| knome | akxwi-dave, didn't flocculant post you the qa admin pass? | 13:17 |
| akxwi-dave | not yet... unless I missed it.. :-) | 13:18 |
| knome | it was sent ages ago | 13:19 |
| akxwi-dave | in that case let me double check | 13:19 |
| knome | :) | 13:20 |
| akxwi-dave | ah ah.. yes he did.. and yes i forgot.. (my lappy remembers it) this pc doesn't | 13:24 |
| knome | :) | 13:24 |
| knome | it now has the added functionality to mark install status as you notice | 13:24 |
| akxwi-dave | excellent .. looking at it now.. | 13:26 |
| flocculant | knome: thanks - exactly as I imagined it :) | 15:58 |
| ochosi | Unit193, bluesabre: would either of you be willing to package up the latest libxfce4ui (release should also come soon) so we can use that for development? | 16:10 |
| flocculant | o/ ochosi | 16:10 |
| Unit193 | ochosi: It's looking for libxfce4ui-2.xml.in which doesn't exist. | 20:29 |
| ochosi | Unit193: oh, hm, meh | 20:32 |
| Unit193 | I'm going to presume this file: http://git.xfce.org/xfce/libxfce4ui/tree/glade/libxfce4ui.xml.in | 20:38 |
| sidi | Unit193, in the package or in the git tree? | 21:05 |
| sidi | Unit193, most Xfce packages on Debian/Xubuntu from what I gather are already xdt-autogen'd. So there's no configure.ac.in either. | 21:06 |
| Unit193 | sidi: Yes usually pickup released tarballs, sometimes re-run autogen for newer arches, but point being libxfce4ui-2.xml.in <-> libxfce4ui.xml.in which I linked to. | 21:06 |
| sidi | so if you take an upstream patch and apply it to an Ubuntu package you need to replace changes in some .in's into the final changes, and/or you need to keep the Makefile.am's and .in files on top of your tree, apply the patch, quilt add the generated filed and run xdt-autogen | 21:07 |
| sidi | Ah | 21:07 |
| sidi | Alright I'm offtopic and I'll shut up now :D | 21:07 |
| ochosi | Unit193: so it's working now? | 21:19 |
| Unit193 | ochosi: After hacking it all up, it does build at least. No idea if glade will work. | 21:19 |
| ochosi | eric_the_idiot: ^ | 21:20 |
| eric_the_idiot | I probably forget to stage the file | 21:22 |
| Unit193 | eric_the_idiot: That's what I figured, though it's missing from potfiles.in too. | 21:31 |
| Unit193 | ochosi: ...Is there somewhere you wanted this (when he pushes the above), it's not exactly in ideal condition fwiw. | 21:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!