[01:38] <Unit193> Logan: I updated it https://launchpad.net/~unit193/+archive/ubuntu/staging/+sourcepub/6482713/+listing-archive-extra
[01:49] <Logan> Unit193: context? :P
[01:50] <Unit193> Logan: Pinged you a few months back, this doesn't even need to pull a new version in.  This enables the use of indicators, IIRC unity doesn't support the systray now?
[01:50] <Logan> I have no clue
[01:50] <Logan> I use Ubuntu headlessly :P
[01:52] <Unit193> I noticed in Xubuntu, at least with my theme, it looks nicer this way too. :P
[01:54] <Unit193> https://github.com/christophgysin/pasystray/issues/36 I think I'd seen this, is why.
[01:54] <Logan> README.md:57-58 claims that it's necessary in Ubuntu 13.04+
[01:54] <Logan> if I upload this, will you forward a patch to Debian?
[01:55] <Logan> it can't hurt for them to build-depend on it as well
[01:56] <Unit193> Last I saw Debian had removed a couple appindicator packages, since Ubuntu runs on snapshots it's harder to maintain.
[01:57] <Logan> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libappindicator
[01:57] <Logan> they still look pretty present to me :P
[01:57] <Logan> I mean, it's orphaned, but it exists
[01:57] <Unit193> This one is still there, though QA maintained.
[01:57] <Unit193> Aye.
[01:57] <Logan> worst case, the Debian maintainer says no
[01:57] <Logan> but I'd rather not carry a delta wherever possible
[01:58] <Logan> but yeah, I'll upload
[02:01] <Unit193> Wish you could do deriv based build-deps like you can with patches.  Best you can do is force --enable-appindicator/--disable-appindicator in d/rules based on --derives-from.
[02:06] <Unit193> Oh heh, fixes https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pasystray/+bug/1470483 too.
[02:29] <Logan> Unit193: the distro-specific quilt series causes more problems than it solves
[02:30] <Logan> because the Debian maintainers often forget that an Ubuntu series exists
[02:30] <Logan> and don't add patches to it that are relevant to both Debian and Ubuntu
[02:30] <Unit193> Heh, there is that.  Though in the case of deluge the maintainer is the same.  I actually forwarded him a patch that allows Ubuntu to directly sync.
[02:30] <Logan> or they forget to refresh the patches upon a new release, and it refuses to build in Ubuntu accordingly
[02:31] <Logan> but it's fine in Debian, of course :P
[02:31] <Logan> that's good to hear
[02:31] <Unit193> And by 'forwarded', I mean I dumped the diff in a pastebin and memoserv'd him. :P
[02:33] <Unit193> Anyway, I need to find more MOTU/sponsors so I'm not pinging you all the time.
[02:41] <Logan> Unit193: haha, it's okay
[02:41] <Logan> I'm off for the summer, so I need things to do :P
[02:41] <Logan> then I'm going to start my full-time job!
[02:41] <Unit193> Nice, where at?  Or rather, what at?
[02:42] <Logan> Site Reliability Engineer at LinkedIn :3
[02:42] <Unit193> Hmm.
[02:43] <Logan> they contribute to the open source community!
[02:43] <Unit193> What springs to mind is more the recent breaches. >_>
[02:43] <Unit193> But, that's nice at least!
[02:43] <Logan> gah
[02:43] <Logan> right, so
[02:44] <Logan> the breach actually happened in 2012
[02:44] <Logan> it's being...resurfaced now
[02:44] <Logan> they obviously have proper salting and hashing on their passwords at this point
[02:44] <Unit193> I remember that one, actually.  That's certainly good, at least they did learn.
[02:45] <Logan> for sure
[02:45] <Unit193> Also, here pretty soon we may be pinging you (and someone else) to review a new package for Universe. >_>
[02:46] <Logan> oh dear :P
[02:47] <Logan> you know how I feel about new packages in Ubuntu
[02:47] <Unit193> Understandably, though path of least resistence and all. >_>
[02:48] <Logan> what package is it?
[02:48] <Unit193> xfdashboard.
[02:49] <Logan> there's an ITP!
[02:49] <Logan> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788332
[02:49] <Unit193> Logan: Look who filed it and how long ago. :P
[02:49] <Logan> oh hi bluesabre
[02:50] <Unit193> Tadaaaa.  Yep.  pkg-xfce isn't so interested either, yey.
[02:50] <bluesabre> uh oh, what'd I do?
[02:50] <Logan> why not? I figured they'd package anything starting with "xf"
[02:50] <bluesabre> pickier than you'd expect :D
[02:50] <Unit193> Logan: Because there's a lot of bugreports and not a lot of people taking care of it.  Pretty much, it's just Corsac at this point.
[02:51] <bluesabre> it's not like things that start with g or k :)
[02:53] <Unit193> https://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs/by-maint/pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org.png
[02:53] <Logan> :(