/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/06/03/#ubuntu-release.txt

=== stokachu_ is now known as stokachu
=== FourDollars_ is now known as FourDollars
=== Trevinho_ is now known as Trevinho
LocutusOfBorghi cjwatson did the gemrb demote to multiverse fail? I still don't see it migrating09:23
LocutusOfBorghi folks, what is missing to see liquidsoap migrate? I'm honestly lost in the ocaml stuff10:03
LocutusOfBorgBTW with liquidsoap and gemrb migrated, I think we are good wrt libpng12 removal10:05
LocutusOfBorgeverything else seems false positive (libpng-dev | libpng12-dev in b-d)10:05
mapreriDepends: liquidsoap yojson (not considered)10:06
mapreriwhich is because of 'Depends: yojson biniou (not considered)'10:06
mapreriwhich is because of 'autopkgtest for botch 0.16-2ubuntu2: ppc64el: Regression ♻ , s390x: Regression ♻'10:06
=== \b is now known as benonsoftware
mapreriLocutusOfBorg: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#biniou is your friend.10:06
LocutusOfBorgyes, but botch is utterly broken, also in debian10:07
LocutusOfBorgI saw that, but I guess some force-hints seems needed10:08
LocutusOfBorgor demote10:08
mapreriLocutusOfBorg: then why do you came here with "why liquidsoap doesn't migrate" instead of asking for a kick for src:biniou directly? :)10:10
LocutusOfBorgbecause I don't feel good in giving orders, I like to mask them under a stupid question :)10:11
mapreri:>10:11
=== Saviq_ is now known as Saviq
cjwatsonLocutusOfBorg: oh right, need to do it in yakkety-proposed as well as yakkety.  done10:19
LocutusOfBorgthanks! I was wondering about how long would it take to be effective :)10:20
LocutusOfBorgcan anybody please help hunspell migrate? I think goldendict failing on s390x is the only reason for it not migrating10:21
cjwatsonhalf an hour or so, bit longer for the proposed-migration cycle10:21
LocutusOfBorgbut it is broken in debian too10:21
LocutusOfBorgcjwatson, nope, I was wondering that before asking again today, not now :)10:21
infinityLocutusOfBorg: What "help" were you hoping for?  You could help it by fixing goldendict...11:53
infinityLocutusOfBorg: If it's a helpful hint, the failure doesn't look to be s390x-specific, but rather 64-bit-big-endian (sparc64 failed the same way, and ppc64 probably would if it had been attempted)11:56
LocutusOfBorginfinity, is adding a cast https://sources.debian.net/src/goldendict/1.5.0%7Egit20160508.g92b5485-1/ripemd.cc/#L17612:36
LocutusOfBorga reasonable solution?12:36
LocutusOfBorgthanks for the *useful* hint, I didn't think about 64 bits12:36
LocutusOfBorgI excluded BE because others were fin12:36
LocutusOfBorgI'm testing on a debian porterbox12:36
LocutusOfBorgwell, count is uint64_t, I can't cast to 32 bits12:38
LocutusOfBorgforwarded upstream12:51
LocutusOfBorginfinity, I guess it is a qt issue, because on debian/s390x is building now fine13:00
infinityLocutusOfBorg: The last build log disagrees.  Or did you just try on a porter?13:12
LocutusOfBorginfinity, I tried in a Debian porterbox and asked a give back on debian buildd13:20
LocutusOfBorgnot sure why ubuntu failed again13:20
LocutusOfBorgthe qt4 stuff is mostly in sync13:20
LocutusOfBorgdo you want to see a build?13:21
LocutusOfBorgzelenka.debian.org has an ongoing build13:21
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Different qt versions between the last Debian failure and your recent attempt?13:24
infinityNot that I see much interesting in the qt4-x11 changelog.13:24
LocutusOfBorgexactly, even symbols file arent showing differences13:25
LocutusOfBorgmoreover I already took the latest qt4 in my last attempt13:25
LocutusOfBorgI'm seeing something interesting now13:26
LocutusOfBorg"-DHAVE_X11" < is not passed in the porterbox13:26
LocutusOfBorgbut I see a -DQT_WEBKIT instead13:27
LocutusOfBorgdamn, the apt-get source is getting the testing version13:34
LocutusOfBorgblah something is bad with unstable mirrors13:35
LocutusOfBorginfinity, does it sound ok for you? http://paste.ubuntu.com/16946618/13:55
LocutusOfBorgI took some bits from libavutil13:55
LocutusOfBorghttps://ffmpeg.org/doxygen/2.3/bswap_8h_source.html13:55
LocutusOfBorgactually that file is coming from there, so I guess we are good13:56
infinityLocutusOfBorg: That seems like an odd hack to work around qFromLittleEndian() breaking, if that's the real bug.13:57
LocutusOfBorginfinity, seems that qFromLittleEndian doesn't exist for 64 bit data types13:58
infinityLocutusOfBorg: But it worked previously?  I mean, this is just a rebuild.13:58
LocutusOfBorgno infinity13:59
LocutusOfBorgthis is a new upstream release13:59
LocutusOfBorgthe old one was #include <libavutil/file.h> now they embedded it there13:59
LocutusOfBorgwith some changes, including this one13:59
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Ahh.13:59
LocutusOfBorghttps://github.com/goldendict/goldendict/commit/a04917833c4fca355123157c4a03ea706fa31c1913:59
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Okay, that makes more sense.13:59
LocutusOfBorgand more sadness13:59
LocutusOfBorghttps://github.com/goldendict/goldendict/issues/71414:02
ogra_infinity, mind takeing a look at this ? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/OSSnapPromotion ... i have some issues to solve and wonder if you know an easy way that doesnt require to much cdimage hackery14:04
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Casting count to a 32-bit type would possibly also fix it, but gross either way.  But if this code is stolen from libav and libav has a fix, that seems reasonable to me.14:05
ogra_essentially we want to build three types of xenial images from different archives, while that is easy to achieve with cdimage vars and different crontab entries, i have no idea how i should actually reflect that on cdimage wrt output dirs ... i dont want all of them in the same www dir14:06
LocutusOfBorginfinity, already uploaded on Ubuntu, and on deferred/5 for debian14:06
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Shiny.14:06
LocutusOfBorgI don't care about upstream code :)14:06
LocutusOfBorgthey want to embed stuff, they have to handle it14:06
LocutusOfBorgand now I want hunspell to migrate :D14:07
infinityLocutusOfBorg: FWIW, the goldendict maintainer is listed in the LowNMU table, you could delete the delayed upload and just upload straight to the queue.14:07
LocutusOfBorgwell, ubuntu is fixed, so I don't care too much about some days14:08
LocutusOfBorgbut I'll consider it14:08
infinityRelease Candidate: xenial-archive + xenial-security/-updates + snapd stable PPA14:08
infinityogra_: ^-- Why a PPA there?  We're SRUing snapd intentionally to keep it up to date.14:08
ogra_infinity, yeah, thats apparently not desired anymore14:09
infinityogra_: ...14:09
cjwatsonAny chance somebody could look at python-libnacl and pymacaroons in xenial-proposed NEW?  Straight backports from yakkety, needed to avoid vendored code in snapcraft14:09
ogra_instead snapd will be a dummy package (an installer for the ubuntu-core snap) and just use the executable from inside the snnap14:09
infinityOookay.14:10
ogra_(there was a long and heated discussion about SRUing ... i kind of lost :/ )14:10
ogra_the original wikipage only said "archive + -updates/-security" for the last image ...14:11
infinityogra_: So, I think our best bet here might be to invent a concept of sub-series in cdimage.  So you can do xenial-edge, xenial-beta, and xenial builds.14:11
infinityogra_: Then everything will end up in a pleasant subdir in the tree.14:11
ogra_yeah, but that sounds like a lot of work ... i was wondering of there isnt something in place already that i could abuse14:11
ogra_(something i dont know about)14:12
infinityNot that I can think of off the top of my head.14:12
ogra_i'm also not sure we want to expose the snaps on cdimage at all in the end ... once there is proper store integration everywhere14:12
infinitycjwatson: I can have a look.  Bug paperwork all looks good, etc?14:12
ogra_so the "switch" would only define the channel to upload to14:12
cjwatsoninfinity: Hopefully; it's bug 158677014:13
ubot5bug 1586770 in python-libnacl (Ubuntu Xenial) "Add pymacaroons to xenial" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/158677014:13
ogra_instead of exposing it on cdimage at all14:13
infinityogra_: Right, I'm equally unconvinced about publishing them to the www tree.  And, indeed, if that's something we can avoid today, then this is almost a moot point.14:14
infinityogra_: Cause your cronjobs would just be '$var $var for-project thing && upload-to-store thing $channel'14:15
ogra_right, they would have to go directly to the store instead ... though that still needs some kind fo "channel-selector" based on the archives used14:15
ogra_ah14:15
infinityogra_: And then we need no knowledge of any of this.  You're just triggering a build and vacuuming the result.14:15
ogra_you would separate the uploader ... clever14:15
ogra_yeah, good idea ... i'll play with that idea. thanks !14:15
LocutusOfBorginfinity, can you please remove vmtk/powerpc? insighttookit is going to be removed, and insighttookit4 is not powerpc ready14:17
LocutusOfBorgDebian dropped it too14:17
infinitycjwatson: I see that's all in universe.  No ongoing MIR for snapcraft?14:17
LocutusOfBorgI guess also insighttookit can be removed, reverse-depends shows nifti2dicom and vmtk but only for powerpc (does it need to migrate first?)14:18
cjwatsoninfinity: Not AFAIK ...14:18
infinitycjwatson: Kay.  Well, if one happens, we can retroactively promote in xenial too.14:18
infinitycjwatson: Lemme do some differy and get back to you.14:19
infinitycjwatson: Oh, and add a bit to the bug about how you intend to test these, please.14:19
cjwatsoninfinity: added14:21
infinitycjwatson: ^^14:24
cjwatsonyay, thanks14:24
infinitycjwatson: Will babysit binary NEW, but if I get distracted, feel free to self-accept.14:25
infinitycjwatson: I'm not reviewing the new binaries for sanity, do be a dear and make sure your testplan involves at least importing both py2 and py3 modules to make sure they exist on disk and such. ;)14:28
cjwatsonPicky, picky.14:28
infinityYeah, I know. :)14:28
infinitycjwatson: Oh, and given the regression potential is <= 0, if you need this ASAP for $reasons, I'm fine with fast-tracking the promotion once you've tested.14:31
cjwatsonI think next week is probably fine.  They seem to have temporarily vendored it anyway, but obviously want to get rid of that pretty soon.14:31
jbichacould I get a yes or no on bug 1584522 please?15:16
ubot5bug 1584522 in One Hundred Papercuts "[UIFe] Don't show GNOME Books by default" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/158452215:16
infinityjbicha: Seems entirely reasonable to me, +115:55
slangasekbdmurray: lp:~brian-murray/ubuntu-archive-tools/add-release-tasks merged; I do note a lot of code duplication between sru-accept and sru-review which is suboptimal and ought to be refactored, but no sense in blocking on that right now16:37
=== tyhicks` is now known as tyhicks
sergiusensslangasek hey, quick question, will this get stuck in xenial when I want to SRU/MRE it as well https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/yakkety/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=snapcraft ?20:41
slangaseksergiusens: if you are following https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SnapcraftUpdates, it should not get stuck20:59
sergiusensslangasek yeah, we are following that, it's just that this is the first time snapcraft gets stuck in the 'new' queue21:02
slangasekoh21:12
slangaseksergiusens: so it will also have to go through binary new, but it shouldn't get "stuck" beyond possibly you having to whack an archive admin into action ;)21:12
sergiusensslangasek I just checked and you happen to be one :-)21:18
slangasekyes21:19
sergiusensnot sure I should whack anyone though :-P21:19
slangaseksergiusens: 'lintian -I snapcraft_2.10+16.10_amd64.changes' has a few things to say21:19
* sergiusens checks21:19
slangasekno blockers, but best practice is to look at lintian output for both the source and binary packages21:20
slangasek^^ and, accepted for yakkety21:21
sergiusensslangasek well my plan is to upload the same thing for X so if it is going to be blocked I'd like to know what would block it21:23
sergiusensslangasek some are really easy to fix and I can21:23
slangaseksergiusens: nope, none of those are blockers for xenial either21:23
sergiusensslangasek thanks btw!21:24
sergiusensslangasek ok, I'll log a bug against snapcraft to fix those for 2.1121:24
sergiusensand get you to review21:24
sergiusensthanks!21:24
=== bluesabre is now known as bluesabre1
=== bluesabre1 is now known as bluesabre

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!