[08:28] hello, i was trying to fix my trackpad in 14.04 and it seems i broke it worse [08:29] i dropped in a 50-synaptics.conf into /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/ [08:29] it didn't have the effect that i wanted, namely it killed my trackpad [08:29] so I removed the file and rebooted [08:29] but now the trackpad still refuses to boot [08:29] question is: does X cache settings somewhere? [08:30] sorry, trackpad refuses to work, not boot [08:30] no [08:31] hm, then my only other theory is that i flipped some hw register or something, and now it's persisten? [08:31] the attempted changes, that is [08:32] does that sound plausible? [08:32] not to me [08:32] hm [08:33] fwiw, i was experiencing the symptoms here, and dropped in the linked conf file -- http://askubuntu.com/questions/657258/chrome-two-finger-scroll-then-right-clicks [08:33] any ideas on how to recover would be greatly appreciated... [08:34] clickpad still responds to clicks, but can't move the cursor around [08:35] shutdown, remove battery and wait for a bit? [08:36] ha. well, it's an xps13 so battery seems not removable [08:38] this is interesting... output from xinput list [08:38] achiang@twiga:~$ xinput list [08:38] ⎡ Virtual core pointer id=2 [master pointer (3)] [08:38] ⎜ ↳ Virtual core XTEST pointer id=4 [slave pointer (2)] [08:38] ⎜ ↳ ELAN Touchscreen id=10 [slave pointer (2)] [08:38] ⎜ ↳ DLL0665:01 06CB:76AD id=12 [slave pointer (2)] [08:38] ⎜ ↳ SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad id=14 [slave pointer (2)] [08:38] ⎣ Virtual core keyboard id=3 [master keyboard (2)] [08:39] looks like i have 2 touchpads configured? [08:39] maybe the 06CB:76AD device is conflicting with the TouchPad device? [08:39] i don't know === bigpet_ is now known as bigpet [09:04] isn't one a touchscreen? [09:52] tseliot: the ELAN device is a touchscreen [09:52] the other two devices are both touchpads, I think [09:53] messed up udev rules? [09:54] if you change a property on one touchpad, what happens to the other one? [09:54] (assuming they are the same device) [09:57] did you muck with bios settings? [09:57] or change the kernel [10:02] achiang: did you install x-x-i-libinput at any point in time? [10:03] the only proper driver ;) [10:04] unless you want to adjust settings in a gui [10:04] that isnt gnome not in ubuntu yet :D [10:22] it's perfect, no need for that === JanC is now known as Guest27710 === JanC_ is now known as JanC [15:01] tseliot: those fixes for getting the krita snap to work, will those also make their way into the ppa drivers? [15:30] jcastro: good point, mamarley, ricotz, the fix for LP: ##1588192 is in both yakkety and xenial-proposed. 361 and 340 are available. I haven't finished my work on 304 yet. [15:57] I guess it also needs to be forward-ported to 367 then. [15:57] Ooh, reported by SABDFL himself. [16:05] tseliot, I see [16:06] ricotz: I am on lunch break so I can go ahead and do 367 now. [16:06] Did you want 364 done too? [16:07] mamarley, go ahead :), I am busy currently [16:07] OK [16:13] thanks [16:14] Argh, lots of failed hunks and fuzz. [16:14] * mamarley loves fixing patches. [16:17] tseliot: I notice that the patch does not appear to have any support for i386 on amd64 systems. Is that intentional? [16:18] (Can 32-bit snaps even be installed on 64-bit systems?) [16:19] mamarley: I'm not really sure, as I'm not familiar with snaps. mvo wrote the code [16:20] of course this only applies to xenial/yakkety [16:20] Correct. [16:20] yep [16:20] snaps are only for >= xenial [16:36] tseliot: I get all sorts of "Could not find "var-lib-snapd-lib-gl.mount" in the /lib/systemd/system directory of nvidia-367-dev" when building. Is that to be expected? [16:37] mamarley: can I see the full output, please? [16:37] 361 built fine here. I haven't tried 367 yet [16:38] tseliot: It build fine, but displays a bunch of new warnings. http://paste.ubuntu.com/16952010/ [16:40] mamarley: I think dh_systemd is calling the same thing on all the packages, whereas it should only be nvidia-367 [16:40] no -dev, etc. [16:41] tseliot: Did it not display the same warning on 361? [16:42] mamarley: yes, it did it even for transitional packages [16:42] that should be easily fixed [16:42] OK, so it isn't my refresh of the patch causing the problem. [16:42] nope [16:44] I don't know how to fix it though. [16:47] tseliot: Should I just leave it for now since the same patch has already been uploaded into the main respository? [16:48] mamarley: yes, go with what we have right now. I'll fix it myself next week [16:48] OK [18:52] ricotz: I have compiled and tested 367.18 with the snappy patch. Any objection to me copying that to the main PPA? I also have nvidia-settings 367 that I never copied. [18:53] I got 364 patched too, but there is some old orig.tar.gz junk in my staging PPA that is preventing it from compiling unless I do a full source upload, so I propose to upload that directly to the main PPA. [19:09] Nevermind, it was a dummy mistake on my part. The 364 build should work this time. [19:52] ricotz: OK, everything is published now. [20:08] mamarley, checked and copied :)