| acheron_uk | clivejo: needs symbols sort I assume http://kci.pangea.pub/job/yakkety_unstable_kcalcore/ | 09:41 |
|---|---|---|
| acheron_uk | *sorting | 09:41 |
| clivejo | acheron_uk: know how to patch symbols? | 10:30 |
| acheron_uk | I tried and got http://paste.ubuntu.com/17086159/ | 10:32 |
| acheron_uk | clivejo: with the actual diff being http://paste.ubuntu.com/17086184/ | 10:35 |
| acheron_uk | assume the +#MISSING needs resolving | 10:35 |
| clivejo | Usually if it is a private symbol, we can ignore it | 10:36 |
| clivejo | theres a link somewhere that we can check symbols | 10:37 |
| acheron_uk | yeah, I got that, but went round in circles trying to check | 10:37 |
| acheron_uk | a link? the API ref, or something more 'friendly'? | 10:38 |
| clivejo | did you feed in both logs? | 10:38 |
| acheron_uk | yes | 10:38 |
| clivejo | acheron_uk: there looks to have been a SO bump recently - https://git.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/+git/kcalcore/commit/?h=kubuntu_unstable&id=4e4b61d7d16ada4126e145ca0e2091d8a22a5b30 | 10:50 |
| clivejo | so that might be ok | 10:51 |
| clivejo | remove it anyway and just make a note in the changelog | 10:51 |
| acheron_uk | fair enough. :) | 10:52 |
| clivejo | yofel: can you shed more light on this? ^ ^ | 10:54 |
| clivejo | acheron_uk: are you subbed to the KDE Release Team ML? | 10:57 |
| acheron_uk | I did sub to a few - have to check | 10:58 |
| clivejo | Did you see this ? https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2016-June/009483.html | 10:58 |
| clivejo | you can sub here - https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team | 10:59 |
| acheron_uk | Yes I got that email, but admit I hadn't read it | 11:00 |
| clivejo | LOL | 11:01 |
| clivejo | thats my problem, too many emails! | 11:01 |
| acheron_uk | I get so many emails on various things, that some filters are set to mark things as auto-read | 11:01 |
| acheron_uk | i.e. they are there for ref if I need them | 11:01 |
| acheron_uk | better turn off that filer | 11:02 |
| acheron_uk | *filter | 11:02 |
| clivejo | yeah, soee_ is supposed to announce this stuff! | 11:02 |
| acheron_uk | for the note on the MISSING in the changlog, do I need to list the whole symbolname? | 11:04 |
| acheron_uk | that seems cumbersome and untidy, but complete | 11:05 |
| clivejo | no, just that you think its safe to remove due to the recent SO bump | 11:05 |
| yofel | is that from the CI build log? | 11:06 |
| clivejo | yofel: yes | 11:06 |
| yofel | on a first guess: I would say "bad" - because the so bump happened for 16.04 already, which has already been released so doesn't cover this | 11:07 |
| yofel | but I didn't look at the actual symbol yet | 11:07 |
| clivejo | it looks to be replacing and existing | 11:08 |
| yofel | also, huh? https://git.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/+git/kcalcore/commit/?h=kubuntu_unstable&id=ff4837985fae4f63a45f326efc48c53c21044c3e | 11:08 |
| * acheron_uk goes to make coffee | 11:10 | |
| clivejo | in that case which symbols do we take | 11:10 |
| clivejo | we had the KCI version in kubuntu_unstable and 16.04.1 in yakkety? | 11:11 |
| yofel | oh, that was a merge? Then fine | 11:14 |
| clivejo | yeah "Merge branch 'kubuntu_stable' into kubuntu_unstable" | 11:14 |
| yofel | I was just irritated as such things normally shouldn't happen | 11:14 |
| clivejo | our work flow hasnt been very fluid recently | 11:15 |
| clivejo | when apps got staged it didnt seem to pull in the unstable changes | 11:16 |
| clivejo | I dont think Scarlett used the script | 11:17 |
| yofel | actually | 11:18 |
| yofel | https://git.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/+git/kcalcore/commit/?h=kubuntu_unstable&id=4e4b61d7d16ada4126e145ca0e2091d8a22a5b30 | 11:18 |
| yofel | has a misworded changelog | 11:18 |
| yofel | that was a lib version bump, *NOT* an SOVERSION bump | 11:19 |
| yofel | otherwise the bottom line would've changed | 11:19 |
| yofel | So to me, this looks like an ABI break introduced by 196f5d638be7ac4b0b085c5e09e41d6ef3927c4b | 11:20 |
| clivejo | - _ZN8KCalCore10ICalFormat13readIncidenceERK10QByteArrayPNS_13ICalTimeZonesE@Base 15.07.90 | 11:20 |
| clivejo | + _ZN8KCalCore10ICalFormat13readIncidenceERK10QByteArray@Base 4:16.04.1 | 11:20 |
| yofel | you might want to ask volker what his intentions were here | 11:20 |
| yofel | yes, he removed a function parameter, that's an ABI break as that function is in KCALCORE_EXPORT ICalFormat -> public: Incidence::Ptr readIncidence(const QByteArray &string); | 11:22 |
| clivejo | Ive been getting crashes in korganizer I wonder are these related | 11:22 |
| yofel | you can't get any more public than that | 11:22 |
| clivejo | in KCalCore::ICalTimeZoneData::ICalTimeZoneData | 11:22 |
| BluesKaj | Howdy folks | 11:22 |
| yofel | only if the actual crash says "missing symbol in ..." | 11:22 |
| yofel | hey | 11:23 |
| acheron_uk | hi BluesKaj | 11:23 |
| BluesKaj | hi acheron_uk | 11:23 |
| yofel | clivejo: https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=kcalcore.git&a=commitdiff&h=196f5d638be7ac4b0b085c5e09e41d6ef3927c4b | 11:23 |
| clivejo | Remove ICalTimeZones from public API here. | 11:24 |
| clivejo | It's supposed to be removed as part of John's work to kill KDateTime and | 11:24 |
| clivejo | KTimeZone, so hide it inside KCalCore here where it's easier to refactor. | 11:24 |
| yofel | sounds sensible, but requires an so version change | 11:25 |
| yofel | so maybe politely ask him whether he's aware of that | 11:25 |
| yofel | sometimes people just don't realize it | 11:26 |
| clivejo | politely? | 11:26 |
| yofel | well, something like "hey, I think your commit foo to bar breaks the ABI, did you forget to change the so version or is that intenional?" | 11:27 |
| yofel | the plasma-nm dev I talked to also didn't realize that back with his wimax refactoring | 11:28 |
| clivejo | that was back in April? | 11:29 |
| yofel | yeah, doesn't look to be part of the 16.04 branch though, so at least it's master-only | 11:30 |
| yofel | ah right, they branched end of march | 11:31 |
| yofel | so maybe just ping him that he should please not forget to bump the so version before 16.08 | 11:31 |
| yofel | or rather just bump it right now | 11:31 |
| clivejo | <hefee> clivejo: we break api/abi yes | 11:35 |
| clivejo | is this a which comes first thing, the chicken or the egg? | 11:36 |
| yofel | depends on what the chicken is ;P | 11:38 |
| yofel | there's no rule for that really, hence why I said "polite reminder" because people tend to forget about it. | 11:38 |
| clivejo | they seem to know about it | 11:38 |
| yofel | I would really recommend not removign the MISSING tag until the version changes | 11:38 |
| yofel | just so that WE don't forget | 11:38 |
| clivejo | so in this case you would leave the #MISSING tag in the symbols file as a reminder? | 11:40 |
| yofel | yep. I hope lintian complains about that... haven't tried that in a while | 11:40 |
| clivejo | Im sure it will | 11:40 |
| clivejo | it usually finds numerious ways to complain about stuff! | 11:41 |
| clivejo | acheron_uk: did you catch all that? | 11:42 |
| acheron_uk | I'm here taking mental notes | 11:42 |
| clivejo | my mental notes are broken | 11:42 |
| * clivejo has to write stuff down | 11:43 | |
| acheron_uk | so basically do the patch and accept that the #MISSING part stays for now? | 11:44 |
| yofel | right | 11:44 |
| clivejo | yup, and make a note in the changelog that you expect a so bump | 11:45 |
| yofel | breaks stuff for people that try to actually use the CI packages, but the workaround for that is more work than it's worth | 11:46 |
| acheron_uk | so something like? http://paste.ubuntu.com/17087001/ | 11:48 |
| yofel | that's fine | 11:49 |
| acheron_uk | phew! | 11:49 |
| clivejo | any way to get these hook/triggers fixed? | 11:51 |
| yofel | which ones? | 11:51 |
| clivejo | LP git ==> KCI rebuild | 11:51 |
| yofel | interesting: " The wikis are locked down to only two teams: ~ubuntu-members and a Canonical team." - That would explain some things | 11:52 |
| * clivejo thinks we should get our own wiki | 11:52 | |
| clivejo | I cant even log into it | 11:53 |
| yofel | well, we use the KDE one for moderately updated stuff or docs page preperation. Notes for fast editing, and docs for static stuff | 11:53 |
| yofel | but yeah, the ubuntu wiki is a mess | 11:53 |
| clivejo | surely a mediawiki install auth users against LP would be lot simpler | 11:54 |
| yofel | but I'm fairly sure that nobody here wants to maintain a wiki. Although we could restrict the login to LP teams as well | 11:54 |
| clivejo | here we go again "Launchpad is temporarily unavailable" | 11:55 |
| acheron_uk | set up a wiki on local machine here ages ago for personal notes, and found it was 10 x hassle than it was actually worth | 11:56 |
| clivejo | for personal stuff I agree | 11:57 |
| clivejo | but for public information and multiple editors, they are great | 11:57 |
| acheron_uk | oh I know, and agree | 11:57 |
| acheron_uk | was replying more to the "I'm fairly sure that nobody here wants to maintain a wiki" part | 11:58 |
| clivejo | unless you get an edit war | 11:58 |
| clivejo | yofel: mind if I stage FW5.22 ? | 11:59 |
| clivejo | sorry 5.23 | 12:00 |
| yofel | go ahead | 12:03 |
| clivejo | can I remove all the packages in staging-frameworks? | 12:04 |
| clivejo | Ill go have lunch and start it running this afternoon | 12:04 |
| BluesKaj | var-lib-snapd-lib-gl.mount is a disabled or a static unit, not starting it ??? | 12:07 |
| BluesKaj | dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/nvidia-opencl-icd-340_340.96-0ubuntu6_amd64.deb (--unpack): | 12:08 |
| BluesKaj | there is no script in the new version of the package - giving up | 12:08 |
| BluesKaj | ok, think it's the kernel version I'm using, it's non default | 12:10 |
| acheron_uk | probably not. they reverted a nvidia change as it caused just such a bug | 12:11 |
| acheron_uk | problem is it can need a bit of a hack to get the fixed packages installed | 12:12 |
| acheron_uk | LP: 1589006 | 12:12 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1589006 in snapd (Ubuntu) "Failed unmounting Mount unit for nvidia support in snappy" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1589006 | 12:12 |
| BluesKaj | didn;t know my nvidia-340 driver needed fixing | 12:12 |
| acheron_uk | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/340.96-0ubuntu6 | 12:13 |
| BluesKaj | don't tell me kubuntu is going to adopt snappy | 12:14 |
| BluesKaj | maybe i should get rid of theubuntu-graphics ppa , i remembered that it's still enabled | 12:15 |
| BluesKaj | that made no difference | 12:17 |
| acheron_uk | there are workarounds in that bug report | 12:22 |
| BluesKaj | ok there's nothing broken here in terms of multimedia | 12:24 |
| BluesKaj | think I'll just leave it for now | 12:25 |
| yofel | well, we're looking at snappy. Although I'm not particulary impressed from what I've seen so far | 12:39 |
| mhall119 | hey guys, is Kubuntu 16.04 using Muon or Muon Discover? | 13:09 |
| clivejo | both | 13:09 |
| mhall119 | are they separate apps? | 13:09 |
| clivejo | it was orginally called Muon | 13:09 |
| clivejo | but the packager manager is Muon Package Manager | 13:10 |
| clivejo | and Discover is the software centre | 13:10 |
| mhall119 | ok, I think I understand now, thanks clivejo | 13:11 |
| clivejo | the package manager was kinda left behind and non-maintain | 13:11 |
| mhall119 | clivejo: (reading the backlog) FWIW the community team is pushing for a switch to MediaWiki for wiki.ubuntu.com | 13:11 |
| clivejo | but a few people have stepped up to maintain it | 13:12 |
| clivejo | mhall119: any progress on that? | 13:12 |
| mhall119 | clivejo: we need to make sure it has a juju charm and mojo spec for IS to easily deploy and scale it | 13:13 |
| mhall119 | then the big effort will be in moving/converting all of the content from moin to mediawiki | 13:13 |
| mhall119 | since they use different markup | 13:13 |
| mhall119 | there are some scripts out there that claim to do this, but they'll need some heavy testing | 13:13 |
| clivejo | Id be against the automatic import of all the moin data | 13:14 |
| mhall119 | yofel: if you have any questions about snappy I can try and answer them, otherwise the experts in #snappy are very helpful | 13:14 |
| clivejo | theres large parts of it are extremely out of data | 13:14 |
| mhall119 | clivejo: that was also discussed, try and fing the most actively edited & viewed pages, and only copy them over | 13:14 |
| mhall119 | most edited we can get, but I don't know if we have data on most viewed | 13:15 |
| clivejo | personally Id ask the community to move it over | 13:15 |
| mhall119 | manually? | 13:15 |
| clivejo | and update everything as they go | 13:15 |
| mhall119 | I don't think the docs team would go for that | 13:17 |
| yofel | mhall119: thanks for the offer, but I talked with didrocks lately and he pointed me to the WIP docs, I just couldn't look into them in depth yet. | 13:19 |
| yofel | but stuff like dependency definition for snappy seemed... very maintainer work intense. But maybe I just didn't properly get how it works | 13:20 |
| mhall119 | yofel: not sure what you mean by "dependency definition" | 13:27 |
| mhall119 | all I've had to do so far is list package names from the archives that needed to be included | 13:28 |
| yofel | mhall119: ok, what I saw in the example IIRC was "stage-packages: libqt5gui5" - which is nonsense IMO as ldd can tell you that. And with the several dozen deps we often have thanks to the split frameworks etc. maintaining that doesn't sound fun | 13:37 |
| mhall119 | yofel: stage-packages is the equivalent of Depends in debian/control | 13:38 |
| yofel | except that *that* is auto-generated by dpkg-shlibdeps | 13:39 |
| mhall119 | it pulls dependencies from their package in the archive, and unpacks them into the snap's filesystem | 13:39 |
| mhall119 | ok, I see what you mean | 13:39 |
| mhall119 | yeah, for krita for example I had to check the build package's Depends, not the source of debian/control | 13:39 |
| mhall119 | which did require a krita 3.0 deb package already exist | 13:40 |
| yofel | I mean, I can understand that the system might have a hard time figuring out what ldd components are part of the foundation, and what is supposed to be included into the snap | 13:40 |
| yofel | but I would essentially need to write a script, that gets a whitelist of all binaries I know of that we might want to have included, run that over the compiled output, filter ldd, and then have that list all wanted packages in the field | 13:41 |
| yofel | would do the job, but sound somewhat clumsy | 13:41 |
| mhall119 | is that what dpkg-shlibdeps does? | 13:42 |
| yofel | to some extent yes, is runs ldd over all binaries, then asks dpkg in what packages said dependencies are (plus other stuff, but that's essentially it) | 13:44 |
| mhall119 | that can probably be done in snapcraft too, you can raise a bug on lp:snapcraft for it to do it | 13:44 |
| mhall119 | then a variable used in stage-packages like in debian/control that will put them in | 13:45 |
| mhall119 | at build time | 13:45 |
| yofel | right, I would hope someone's already looking at that, I simply didn't check yet | 13:46 |
| BluesKaj | is kubuntu adopting snap or snappy or whatever it's called? | 13:46 |
| mhall119 | maybe someone is, but there's a lot of work going into snapcraft right now, so having a bug to track it would be good | 13:47 |
| mhall119 | BluesKaj: Kubuntu has the tools already in 16.04's archive | 13:47 |
| yofel | BluesKaj: additionally maybe, as a potential replacement for the backports eventually. If things turn out to work better than they do right now | 13:48 |
| BluesKaj | thanks mhall119, yofel | 13:48 |
| mhall119 | it's still early days, but we're using KDE apps as real world use cases to work through the limitations and bugs in snappy | 13:48 |
| yofel | heh | 13:49 |
| acheron_uk | clivejo: will KCI pick up the the new version numbers 5.23 for frameworks on it's own somewhere, or will someone have to update each component? | 14:57 |
| clivejo | acheron_uk: Thats why I was wanting to do the staging | 14:57 |
| clivejo | but Im having trouble with the script | 14:57 |
| acheron_uk | That was what I hoped | 14:58 |
| clivejo | http://paste.ubuntu.com/17090243/ | 15:01 |
| acheron_uk | clivejo: just tried and got the same | 15:11 |
| acheron_uk | not that I really know what I'm doing with that | 15:12 |
| acheron_uk | clivejo: missing comma in https://git.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/+git/kubuntu-automation/tree/upstream-names.json | 15:39 |
| acheron_uk | line 30 after libkleo | 15:39 |
| acheron_uk | "libkleo" I mean | 15:40 |
| clivejo | ah thanks | 15:52 |
| acheron_uk | had to be something simple I thought, but my python is not great so slightly amazed I worked that out | 15:56 |
| clivejo | few big downloads | 16:14 |
| acheron_uk | probably just as well it rejected my ssh key when I tested then | 16:15 |
| clivejo | just telling you what I been telling you :P | 16:16 |
| acheron_uk | what? | 16:16 |
| clivejo | become a kubuntu member :P | 16:17 |
| acheron_uk | bit early to do that | 16:17 |
| clivejo | why? | 16:17 |
| acheron_uk | don't you need 2 months sustained contributions or something? | 16:18 |
| clivejo | yeah, but you can start getting your profile and set a date for meeting | 16:18 |
| acheron_uk | good point | 16:19 |
| clivejo | you have a good understand | 16:19 |
| clivejo | probably more than me! | 16:19 |
| acheron_uk | don't know about that, but I generally learn quickly | 16:20 |
| clivejo | ok staging script completed | 16:21 |
| clivejo | 3 problem packages | 16:21 |
| clivejo | did you get a KDE ID? | 16:23 |
| acheron_uk | yes. but not a developer/contributor account yet | 16:23 |
| clivejo | dont think you need that for depot | 16:24 |
| acheron_uk | I thought you did, but could be wrong... | 16:24 |
| acheron_uk | I don't see any option to upload a ssh key, except in the dev account application https://identity.kde.org/index.php?r=developerApplication | 16:26 |
| acheron_uk | as and far as I can tell, depot tells you to get lost without one registered | 16:27 |
| yofel | it's 6 months actually - no exceptions, except that any kind of kubuntu related activity is valid | 16:28 |
| acheron_uk | fair enough | 16:28 |
| acheron_uk | https://community.kde.org/Kubuntu/Membership | 16:29 |
| acheron_uk | If you think your contributions have been significant and sustained, you can try to become a member. Generally, a minimum of two months of visible, significant activity will be required. | 16:29 |
| acheron_uk | yofel: so that 2 months is wrong? ^^^ | 16:30 |
| clivejo | Im not sure, but theres lots of stuff needs doing :) | 16:31 |
| clivejo | I only decided to go for it after valorie bribed me! | 16:32 |
| yofel | acheron_uk: yes, I guess that page is a bit outdated and needs fixing. The official guideline is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Membership/NewMember - "it is rare for applications to be accepted from people contributing for less than 6 months" | 16:32 |
| clivejo | and so I could push buttons on KCI | 16:32 |
| acheron_uk | yep. I'm not overly bothered. would be nice, but it's not the reason I'm here | 16:33 |
| yofel | the borderline is a bit fuzzy, as you can never give a fixed starting point for "contributing", but we once got told "please don't do that" when we accepted someone after 2 months | 16:33 |
| acheron_uk | I can understand that | 16:35 |
| acheron_uk | they want people who are going to carry on with it it, rather someone putting in a short amount of effort to gain a 'badge' | 16:36 |
| yofel | exactly. You get a bunch of benefits, as well as a bunch of additional permissions with the membership, so it shouldn't be given out lightly. Makes it more valuable to have too ;) | 16:37 |
| acheron_uk | Indeed. it has to be meaningful | 16:38 |
| clivejo | acheron_uk: but you need to start on that path | 16:50 |
| acheron_uk | think I already have | 16:53 |
| clivejo | indeed :) | 16:53 |
| acheron_uk | but yes, if going to end up there then it's best to have it in mind | 16:54 |
| acheron_uk | get ducks in a row as they say | 16:54 |
| clivejo | keep posting up git diff's | 16:55 |
| clivejo | if they make sense I have no problem pushing them for you :) | 16:56 |
| acheron_uk | I shall, and hopefully at a better pace once I have a better idea how to prioritise | 16:56 |
| acheron_uk | i.e. things that are blocking the building of several others | 16:58 |
| yofel | do you have a change that you want applied right now? I would like to try having Launchpad be of use here ;) | 16:59 |
| clivejo | acheron_uk: so Ive run the staging script | 16:59 |
| acheron_uk | at the moment it feels like taking random potshots, which it not bad per se, but I would hope can do it with more reason | 16:59 |
| clivejo | and I have a bunch of files I have to upload to the PPA | 16:59 |
| acheron_uk | yofel: not this sec | 16:59 |
| clivejo | Im about to go the git push | 16:59 |
| clivejo | so I need to pause KCI | 17:00 |
| acheron_uk | clivejo: yes. imagine that would be wise | 17:00 |
| yofel | acheron_uk: how much do you know about git? | 17:00 |
| yofel | as in: do you know what a pull request is? | 17:01 |
| acheron_uk | yofel: very much beginner, but I do learn well | 17:01 |
| acheron_uk | yofel: basically a request to include your changes? | 17:03 |
| yofel | yes, the better git hosting solutions like github and gitlab make heavy use of them for reviews, and LP can do them as well by now. | 17:04 |
| acheron_uk | most things I done with git are just messing around with a local copy for my own purposes | 17:04 |
| yofel | That's I think a better way to do this than sending diffs around ;) | 17:04 |
| yofel | Now I need to figure out how to properly use them on LP though... | 17:04 |
| clivejo | can you tell me how as well | 17:05 |
| acheron_uk | If you can, and I am able to submit them, then yes sounds better | 17:05 |
| clivejo | this move to LP git is all new to me | 17:05 |
| * clivejo opens up a new kate document | 17:06 | |
| * clivejo kicks KCI | 17:06 | |
| clivejo | its too quiet | 17:07 |
| clivejo | its like a bad child, when it goes quiet its time to worry | 17:07 |
| yofel | isn't it usually done with the daily builds around this time? | 17:08 |
| clivejo | noooo | 17:08 |
| clivejo | only gets done about an hour or two before it starts over again! | 17:08 |
| clivejo | about 22:00-23:00 my time | 17:09 |
| yofel | So, I tried making this: https://code.launchpad.net/~yofel/kubuntu-packaging/+git/kcalcore/+merge/296702 by cloning kcalcore, committing, running "git push lp:~yofel/kubuntu-packaging/+git/kcalcore kubuntu_unstable", going to the repository branch site for the repo I just pushed to and opening a pull request | 17:09 |
| yofel | the annoying part is that you have to manually fill in the merge target :/ | 17:09 |
| yofel | github can guess that.. | 17:09 |
| yofel | but I guess it would do the job | 17:10 |
| yofel | now I'm off for dinner though. bbl | 17:11 |
| * acheron_uk get ready to try that | 17:11 | |
| * clivejo wanders off for dinner too | 17:12 | |
| clivejo | well I got an email for your test | 17:12 |
| BluesKaj | at least the nvidia upgrade bug isn't preventing other upgrades from working | 17:13 |
| BluesKaj | so far | 17:14 |
| acheron_uk | LP: is not responding to any clone I try to do, and some error pages on the website. | 17:26 |
| acheron_uk | so I think time for refreshment here as well | 17:26 |
| IrcsomeBot | <Clifford> Large whiskey! | 17:46 |
| acheron_uk | tempting | 17:53 |
| * genii sprinkles some in his next coffee | 18:14 | |
| acheron_uk | clivejo : yofel think that worked | 18:17 |
| acheron_uk | https://code.launchpad.net/~acheron/kubuntu-packaging/+git/kcalcore/+merge/296709 | 18:28 |
| acheron_uk | so now that is rejected or accpeted, whet do I do with that repo/branch I created under my LP usermame? Keep it? Bin it and start over next time I need to propose a change to that packaging? | 18:56 |
| clivejo | I rejected it | 18:56 |
| clivejo | cause its a test :P | 18:56 |
| clivejo | but thats pretty cool, I can add comments and stuff | 18:57 |
| * acheron_uk is still dealing with the rejection | 18:57 | |
| clivejo | LOL you already fixed kcalcore :P | 18:58 |
| acheron_uk | did you get an email notification? | 18:59 |
| clivejo | yes | 18:59 |
| acheron_uk | good. I got a bounce message from kubuntu-devel list, presumably as I wasn't subbed then under my LP email | 19:00 |
| acheron_uk | preumably it also went to kubuntu-packagers as well | 19:01 |
| clivejo | acheron_uk: could you write a guide to how you do that? | 19:02 |
| acheron_uk | to put where? | 19:02 |
| clivejo | hopefully the Dojo :) | 19:03 |
| acheron_uk | ok, I really meant in what sort of format | 19:04 |
| acheron_uk | how would that be presented in the dojo? | 19:04 |
| clivejo | not sure yet | 19:04 |
| acheron_uk | bullet point style list? | 19:04 |
| clivejo | just basic instructions | 19:04 |
| * clivejo has never done this before | 19:05 | |
| clivejo | most of my stuff was git diffs | 19:05 |
| acheron_uk | I'll just do it as a bullet point list then that you could have on a slide, or adapt to something else | 19:05 |
| clivejo | can you propose a totally new git repo, or does it have to already exist? | 19:06 |
| acheron_uk | I just pushed to my account and it all created itself | 19:06 |
| clivejo | nice | 19:09 |
| acheron_uk | it was ridiculously easy | 19:09 |
| clivejo | well thats the main reason to move to LP | 19:10 |
| clivejo | hopefully make it easier for people to help maintain the packaging | 19:10 |
| acheron_uk | that's partly why I asked about whether I should bin it after each time, as it was so simple to create each time | 19:10 |
| acheron_uk | yes having it all together is good | 19:11 |
| clivejo | Ive pushed most of FW5.23 to LP and PPA | 19:14 |
| clivejo | there are 3 Ill have to do manually | 19:15 |
| acheron_uk | anything actually built? | 19:17 |
| clivejo | yup | 19:17 |
| clivejo | ECM | 19:17 |
| clivejo | http://qa.kubuntu.co.uk/ppa-status/frameworks/build_status_5.23.0_yakkety.html | 19:17 |
| acheron_uk | that makes sense | 19:18 |
| clivejo | but the rest will need a poke | 19:18 |
| mamarley | Once the stuff builds I will test it on my Yakkety VM and report the results. :) | 19:19 |
| acheron_uk | I need to make another one of those | 19:19 |
| clivejo | running kubuntu-retry-builds script | 19:19 |
| acheron_uk | the YY VM I have started off as xubuntu, as I couldn't get the YY iso to install | 19:20 |
| clivejo | my internet seems to be misbehaving | 19:23 |
| acheron_uk | I assume rick has not scheduled the next dojo? | 19:29 |
| clivejo | not sure | 19:29 |
| clivejo | theres a podcast tomorrow, so probably find out more then | 19:30 |
| acheron_uk | didn't know that. TY | 19:30 |
| clivejo | https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-ChyPPcJSMUw2au2UyIKwQ | 19:31 |
| clivejo | set yourself a reminder :) | 19:32 |
| acheron_uk | reminder set | 19:32 |
| * clivejo thinks kubuntu needs more how-to clips on Youtube | 19:34 | |
| acheron_uk | especially now plasma 5 has changed a lot, and many will be upgrading from trusty | 19:35 |
| acheron_uk | this one wasn't bad https://www.kubuntuforums.net/showthread.php?70261-Excellent-Plasma-desktop-tutorial | 19:37 |
| soee_ | hiho | 20:02 |
| clivejo | hi soee_ | 20:04 |
| soee_ | wee My S5 Neo is installing Android 6 update... finally | 20:34 |
| marco-parillo | This (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1577540) is still affecting me. | 20:40 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1577540 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Yakkety) "ubi-console-setup failing on yakkety images" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 20:40 |
| marco-parillo | If it is widespread, do not be so quick to delete your YY partitions / VMs because it might be difficult to get them back | 20:41 |
| acheron_uk | testing installing from the daily ISO in a VM now | 20:57 |
| acheron_uk | marco-parillo: http://i.imgur.com/7S6K9wB.png | 20:58 |
| clivejo | yofel: Theres a missing symbol here worrying me, can you can a look? https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/ubuntu/staging-frameworks/+build/9881240 | 21:05 |
| marco-parillo | acheron_uk: That is it. I will add to the bug report. | 21:10 |
| acheron_uk | marco-parillo: and if I try to ignore and continue, eventually get http://i.imgur.com/W2Rp5FU.png | 21:12 |
| acheron_uk | and that is on the 2nd go, after one failure the same already | 21:12 |
| marco-parillo | If it is pretty unviversal, I wonder why this is not marked as a critical bug. | 21:13 |
| acheron_uk | just going to try xubuntu daily to see what happens to that | 21:13 |
| jimarvan | hey lovely people | 21:18 |
| acheron_uk | marco-parillo: same on xubuntu | 21:18 |
| acheron_uk | hi jimarvan :) | 21:19 |
| clivejo | hi jimarvan | 21:19 |
| marco-parillo | TY | 21:20 |
| jimarvan | how are you guys? | 21:20 |
| jimarvan | god I am exhausted | 21:20 |
| clivejo | too hot | 21:20 |
| clivejo | and really realy fed up with LP | 21:20 |
| jimarvan | :D | 21:22 |
| jimarvan | gn peeps, see you tomorrow! :) | 21:35 |
| clivejo | acheron_uk: if you have patches for FW5.23 feel free to submit them | 22:09 |
| acheron_uk | clivejo: I'll have a look in the morning | 22:25 |
| clivejo | no prob | 22:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
