[16:00] <gnuoy> #startmeeting ubuntu-server-team
[16:00] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Jun  7 16:00:08 2016 UTC.  The chair is gnuoy. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[16:00] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[16:00] <gnuoy> Thanks to cpaelzer for covering for me last week. Let's get cracking...
[16:00] <jgrimm> o/
[16:00] <nacc> o/
[16:00] <cpaelzer> o/ , your welcome
[16:00] <gnuoy> #topic Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[16:00] <gnuoy> I see no actions from the lastn meeting, so onwards and upwards unless anyone knows any different?
[16:00] <caribou> o/
[16:00] <cpaelzer> gnuoy: I forgot to put me at the end of the list - move me with you afterwards as "payment" :-)
[16:01] <rbasak> o/
[16:01] <gnuoy> cpaelzer, wil do!
[16:01] <gnuoy> #topic Yakkety Development
[16:01] <gnuoy> #link https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/ReleaseSchedule
[16:01] <gnuoy> Anyone got anything to highlight vis-à-vis Yakkety Development?
[16:02] <jgrimm> ah, nacc any movement on php cleanup?
[16:02] <nacc> jgrimm: still working on it, refocusing on that this week
[16:02] <jgrimm> great! steve brought that up to me in 1x1 yesterday
[16:02] <nacc> got a few packages fixed in debian, but then the debian maintainers also said they'd rather delete a package then get an NMU fix
[16:03] <nacc> so... we'll see where that goes
[16:03] <jgrimm> no worries, just wanted to poke it forward a bit
[16:03] <gnuoy> thanks nacc, jgrimm
[16:03] <nacc> jgrimm: ack
[16:03] <gnuoy> #subtopic Release Bugs
[16:03] <gnuoy> #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-y-tracking-bug-tasks.html#ubuntu-server
[16:03] <gnuoy> I believe rbasak will go over current assigned bugs at the end, anything for now?
[16:04] <jgrimm> looks good
[16:04] <gnuoy> ta
[16:04] <gnuoy> #topic Server & Cloud Bugs (caribou)
[16:04] <caribou> been working on a few merges :
[16:04] <caribou> corosync that turns out to be a sync
[16:05] <gnuoy> \o/
[16:05] <caribou> clamav & kexec-tools
[16:05] <jgrimm> nice
[16:05] <caribou> & a few sponsored uploads
[16:05] <gnuoy> thanks caribou
[16:05] <gnuoy> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team
[16:05] <gnuoy> Not sure who to prod for this, jgrimm ?
[16:06] <jgrimm> gnuoy, I have a new QA person starting at beginning of July
[16:06] <jgrimm> so nothing else to report there
[16:06] <gnuoy> tip top!
[16:06] <gnuoy> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb, sforshee, arges)
[16:06] <smb> nothing new here
[16:06] <gnuoy> any q's for smb et al?
[16:07] <gnuoy> I shall take silence as consent to move on...
[16:07] <jgrimm> all good
[16:07] <gnuoy> #topic Upcoming Call For Papers
[16:07] <gnuoy> Ok, moving on
[16:08] <gnuoy> #topic Ubuntu Server Team Events
[16:08] <gnuoy> jgrimm: anything coming up?
[16:08] <jgrimm> no sir
[16:08] <gnuoy> #topic Open Discussion
[16:08] <teward> o/ (late, sorry)
[16:08] <teward> situational awareness wrt nginx:
[16:08] <teward> security fix released last week, uploaded to Yakkety
[16:09] <teward> merge is on hold because I observed Debian indicating they're still 'testing' dynamic module support
[16:09] <teward> makes me think it's not entirely stable yet
[16:09] <teward> so i'll keep an eye on that, but that todo on the blueprint'll remain BLOCKED or TODO un‎til it looks OK
[16:09] <jgrimm> thanks teward! on top of things as always
[16:09] <gnuoy> would anyone like to get anything else off their chest?
[16:09] <cpaelzer> gnuoy: before you close, you might want to pass chair to rbasak for bug discussion
[16:10] <gnuoy> yep, one step ahead of you
[16:10] <cpaelzer> :-)
[16:10] <gnuoy> #topic Announce next meeting date, time and chair
[16:10] <gnuoy> next meeting will be in a week date 14th of june, same time
[16:10] <gnuoy> #topic Assigned merges/bugwork (rbasak)
[16:10] <gnuoy> #chair rbasak
[16:10] <meetingology> Current chairs: gnuoy rbasak
[16:10] <rbasak> Thankg gnuoy!
[16:10] <rbasak> Thanks!
[16:10] <gnuoy> my pleasure!
[16:10] <rbasak> Can I have status first please?
[16:10] <rbasak> cpaelzer: bug 1507681, bug 1495988
[16:11]  * jgrimm hangs head in shame
[16:11] <rbasak> jgrimm: bug 1397250
[16:11] <jgrimm> rbasak, no progress, please keep with me tho (as discussed, low priority)
[16:11] <cpaelzer> 1507681 waiting for sponsoring (as last week), 1495988 just subscribed sponsors a few minutes ago
[16:12] <rbasak> cpaelzer: sorry, I did say I'd review that. I will make a note.
[16:12] <rbasak> nacc: bug 1423498, bug 1524635, bug 1570472, bug 1553563, bug 1570923
[16:13] <rbasak> rharper: bug 1384503, bug 1457957, bug 1511735, bug 1491406
[16:13] <rbasak> I don't see magicalChicken here so I'll ask him in #ubuntu-server after this meeting.
[16:13] <cpaelzer> rbasak: as I "only" wait for sponsoreing review - you may pass me another one - might find no time but better I know one if time suddenly shows up
[16:13] <rbasak> cpaelzer: that's a good point, thank you,.
[16:13] <nacc> rbasak: nothing on the bacula bugs (although they are moving to the top of my list today). 1524635 submitted a fix, but it didn't quite work (I believe i made a mistake, testing a fix now). I would think 1570472 and 1457957 are the same, possibly?
[16:14] <nacc> (the latter being assigned to rharper)
[16:14] <caribou> cpaelzer: 1495988 only have a task for the dev release. What series do you need to SRU to ?
[16:14] <cpaelzer> trusty
[16:14] <caribou> cpaelzer: ok, will take care of that
[16:14] <cpaelzer> caribou: +1 karma
[16:15] <nacc> rbasak: 1423498, waiting for user testing
[16:15] <rbasak> Thanks caribou!
[16:15] <cpaelzer> caribou: let me know if there is anything not as it should be
[16:15]  * rbasak is catching up on nacc's responses
[16:15] <caribou> cpaelzer: sure
[16:15] <nacc> rbasak: 1570472, gave feedback to sdeziel, waiting on a new patch to review
[16:16] <rbasak> nacc: OK so bug 1524635 is making progress, but I think you need a bug task for Trusty? Shall I create that?
[16:17] <nacc> rbasak: yes, please (was going to ask for it once i had filled out the SRU template, as that's the order on the wiki page)
[16:17] <rharper> sorry, here now
[16:17] <rharper> rbasak: on the augeas bug, I'm working on a reproducer; should have that today with a suggestion from someone
[16:17] <rbasak> Ah, OK. I presume the SRU page has that order to prevent needless bug tasks, but I think for our team here it's fine to create them in advance if we reasonably think that an SRU will be needed.
[16:17] <nacc> rbasak: ack, will update my mental model :)
[16:18] <rharper> rbasak: for libnl3, that's all fixed released at this point; I don't think there is anything left to do in that bug.
[16:18] <jgrimm> \o/
[16:19] <rharper> rbasak: rsync, I don't know what else to do with it, we're stuck without a reproducable data, someone hits it but never shares their datafile;  I tried the simple Xenial rsync to Trusty but wasn't that trivial to hit (as we've said multiple times)
[16:19] <rharper> will poke at the puppet bug today as well;
[16:19] <rbasak> nacc: for bug 1423498, I think it's OK to mark it cleared for now. Please follow up if it makes any progress.
[16:20] <nacc> rbasak: yep, agreed
[16:20] <nacc> rharper: you may want to look at 1570472, and your puppet bug may be a dupe
[16:21] <rharper> nacc: thanks for the heads up;
[16:21] <rharper> ISTR that someone else was looking at a similar issue before X released
[16:22] <rbasak> nacc: puppet dupes> yeah, seems likely. Please can you or rharper agree, dupe and assign to just one of you as necessary?
[16:22] <rharper> rbasak: ack
[16:22] <nacc> rbasak: ack
[16:22] <rharper> nacc: you're bug looks nicer (see debdiff attached) =)
[16:23] <nacc> rharper: i spent some time on my puppet bug this week, i can look at yours and decide
[16:23] <nacc> rharper: also true :)
[16:23] <rharper> cool
[16:23] <rharper> also sdeziel is on yours which helps move things along =)
[16:23] <nacc> yep
[16:24] <rbasak> OK so I'll mark rharper's 957 as cleared in my tracking spreadsheet, but please do mark the dupe in LP too. Thanks!
[16:24] <rharper> np
[16:24] <nacc> yep
[16:25] <rharper> rbasak: any other thoughts on the rsync bug ... I mean, we can only say so many times that we need a dataset that reproduces it to fully understand the fix and regression potential
[16:25] <rbasak> rharper: agreed but I'm still catching up, sorry. I'll get there in a moment.
[16:25] <rharper> rbasak: np
[16:25] <rbasak> nacc: I think I'm done with your progress updates - thank you.
[16:26] <nacc> rbasak: np, thanks -- feel free to add more bugs to my plate as you go
[16:26] <nacc> i may start a pad or something to help track my own status on them, fwiw
[16:26] <rbasak> I've got some new bugs to assign lined up. I'll cover them after I catch up on progress.
[16:26] <rbasak> Sorry this is taking a while - I'm juggling a ton of bug numbers :)
[16:28] <rbasak> rharper: OK so bug 1384503 next. I agree with you. I would update the bug description with a "[Status]" section right at the top with basically what you just said, and then we can leave it Incomplete and consider it cleared from a tracking perspective. If you could stay subscribed or assigned please, then if it does make any progress we can track it again.
[16:28] <rbasak> rharper: I find that updating the status right at the top makes it really clear for those who comment and complain etc without actually reading all the comments.
[16:29] <rharper> rbasak: OK ,will do
[16:29] <rbasak> rharper: marking bug 1511735 as cleared - thank you for driving and suffering all that pain!
[16:30] <rharper> rbasak: sure
[16:30] <rbasak> Noting bug 1491406 as making progress, thank you.
[16:31] <rharper> rbasak: yep, I should have the reproducer done today, and iwth that I can create a debdiff with the fix pulled from upstream/current-release
[16:31] <rbasak> Sounds good!
[16:31] <rbasak> OK I'm done with progress updates I think. Did I miss anything?
[16:32] <jgrimm> nicely done. thanks
[16:32] <rbasak> I have four bugs lined up to assign, mainly for continued ramp up.
[16:33] <rbasak> If anyone has any others that may be more important to point out, please do.
[16:33] <rbasak> Bug 1581839 is a good one for packaging practice.
[16:34] <rbasak> Also I have bug 1524526, bug 1544400 and bug 1472639. I don't know if are valid and need an actual upload but it would be good to get these off the list.
[16:34] <rbasak> That will do for now I think, unless anyone has any others that need attention?
[16:34] <rbasak> nacc, I would definitely put your bacula bugs above all of these.
[16:35] <nacc> rbasak: ack
[16:35] <rbasak> Any takers?
[16:36] <rbasak> Well, cpaelzer already volunteered, so I'm going to give him bug 1581839 and bug 1524526.
[16:37] <rbasak> nacc's plate is full I think.
[16:37] <cpaelzer> rbasak: thanks
[16:37] <rbasak> rharper, shall I give you bug 1472639 so you don't end up empty?
[16:37] <rharper> rbasak: sure
[16:37] <cpaelzer> rbasak: as I said this time it might take more time as I'm also a day off, but I'll look into them as soon as I can
[16:37] <rbasak> cpaelzer: sure, that's absolutely fine.
[16:38] <rbasak> We're still on fairly low priority bugs at the moment, but I think things are ramping up well.
[16:38] <rbasak> Please do make a note of anything you think needs more attention and we can assign them next week.
[16:38] <rbasak> Thanks all!
[16:38] <jgrimm> thanks rbasak
[16:38] <rbasak> Any comments or questions before I close?
[16:39] <rbasak> #endmeeting
[16:39] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue Jun  7 16:39:13 2016 UTC.
[16:39] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2016/ubuntu-meeting.2016-06-07-16.00.moin.txt
[16:39] <cpaelzer> thanks rbasak for controlling the hoarde of bug numbers
[16:39] <cpaelzer> thanks gnuoy for the meeting
[16:39] <cpaelzer> o/ everybody
[16:40] <caribou> thanks everyone !