=== hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln === hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko [12:44] Hi, does anyone know about this bug in Ubuntu 16.04/Unity/64-bit , that causes applications to not appear right after they are installed, but after relog they appear? (Still can open them through terminal) [20:36] Hi, anybody able to look at bug 1585928 for a SRU? [20:36] bug 1585928 in llvm-defaults (Ubuntu) "[SRU] llvm-defaults 0.33ubuntu4 [was: lldb package does not provide a lldb-server symlink to the current default version]" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1585928 [21:26] jhenke: you mean you need it nominated for the appropriate series? this is the right place to ask === tinoco is now known as tinoco-vacation === tinoco-vacation is now known as tinoco === tinoco is now known as tinoco-vacation [21:44] nacc if it is called like that, the bug was fixed in yakkety, I real would like it to be fixed in xenial too, I prepared the bug's description [21:44] the diff is fairly trivial [21:44] nacc I have asked several times the last days, sadly you are the first to answer here [21:45] jhenke: the sru page says clearly what is needed, have you prepared the debdiff? or do you need someone else to? [21:46] I am not so much into this debdiff thing [21:46] so the answer is no unfortunately, but it should be trivial and available from launchpad [21:47] jhenke: debdiffs aren't available? as they need changelog and proper attribution, etc. to go into the right series. someone still needs to do that work [21:47] hmm I did not provide anything, but I mean the package's site should have it [21:47] jhenke: but in any case, the first step is getting it nominated to the 16.04 series, which you have attempted to by asking here. My only advice is to ask again until it happens [21:48] jhenke: not sure I follow. The debdiff in the bug is for yakkety. You need something similar for xenial (but it won't necessarily be identical) [21:48] xenial has 0.33ubuntu3, the fixed version is 0.33ubuntu4 [21:48] well yaketty had the same version until the fix [21:49] nacc thanks, so I am still looking for some deve to nominate it for 16.04 [22:19] jhenke: the 'package's site' means nothing - what nacc is talking about for changelog entries is that one has to be created for the Debian site, packaging updated if there's core changes, etc. to make a package SRU-able [22:20] but someone will have to do that work [22:20] not necessarily you, but...