| ginggs | pitti, slangasek: i've expanded the info in LP: #1556685 and uploaded the oce SRU again | 10:11 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1556685 in oce (Ubuntu Xenial) "[SRU] Wrong installation path (0.16 instead of 0.17)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1556685 | 10:11 |
| === pietroalbini_ is now known as pietroalbini | ||
| sergiusens | bdmurray or slangasek care to approve snapcraft into xenial-proposed? | 15:51 |
| bdmurray | sergiusens: I'll take a look | 15:52 |
| sergiusens | ty | 15:53 |
| mardy | hi all, can please someone help me with this: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/yakkety/update_excuses.html#account-plugins | 15:54 |
| mardy | the ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts is already in yakkety | 15:54 |
| mardy | so I don't understand what the account-plugins package is waiting for | 15:54 |
| nacc | mardy: component mismatch | 15:55 |
| nacc | mardy: account-plugins is in main | 15:55 |
| nacc | mardy: ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts is in universe | 15:55 |
| nacc | (and account-plugin-owncloud is in main too) | 15:56 |
| mardy | nacc: OK... so, if I wanted to move account-plugin-owncloud to universe, how should I do that? is it a matter of changing debian/control? | 15:57 |
| nacc | mardy: i think that's indicated here: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed for account-plugin-owncloud | 15:57 |
| nacc | mardy: no, someone (an AA? not sure where this permission starts to be granted) has to demote it | 15:57 |
| nacc | it's on the list already, afaict | 15:57 |
| mardy | nacc: OK. Would you suggest someone to ping, just to be sure? | 15:59 |
| cjwatson | AA, yes. I'll do it | 15:59 |
| nacc | cjwatson: thanks! (and noted who has those rights) | 15:59 |
| mardy | cjwatson: thanks! | 15:59 |
| bdmurray | sergiusens: Why is 2.11+16.10 still in proposed? | 16:00 |
| cjwatson | (done) | 16:01 |
| bdmurray | sergiusens: it looks like an amd64 test regression - http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/snapcraft/yakkety/amd64 | 16:03 |
| sergiusens | bdmurray oh, snapd in -proposed might be hitting us there (which also fails) | 16:23 |
| sergiusens | elopio care to look at that? ^ | 16:24 |
| bdmurray | sergiusens: I don't think its snapd related Get:24 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu yakkety/main amd64 snapd amd64 2.0.2 [4,011 kB] | 16:25 |
| bdmurray | sergiusens: from https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-yakkety/yakkety/amd64/s/snapcraft/20160610_090430@/log.gz | 16:25 |
| sergiusens | bdmurray heh snapd on xenial-updates is already 2.0.5... | 16:27 |
| bdmurray | sergiusens: my concern is that if the yakkety autopkgtests are failing, they'll likely fail for xenial too | 16:27 |
| sergiusens | bdmurray the error is from snapd, not much we can do but disable the tests | 16:28 |
| sergiusens | bdmurray they won't | 16:28 |
| bdmurray | okay | 16:28 |
| sergiusens | bdmurray all our code changes run adt for xenial https://github.com/ubuntu-core/snapcraft/pull/559 | 16:29 |
| sergiusens | bdmurray you will need vpn to see the results, but we do run | 16:30 |
| bdmurray | sergiusens: okay, I'll approve it | 16:31 |
| bdmurray | sergiusens: oh and fwiw snapcraft.io/create never loads for me | 16:35 |
| didrocks | bdmurray: normal, it will be on on tuesday | 16:35 |
| didrocks | the goal is to have the tour available by then | 16:36 |
| elopio | bdmurray: thanks. | 16:39 |
| elopio | and yes, we won't release this until next week. We just want to be ready for when the site is ready. | 16:40 |
| elopio | I'm trying to reproduce the snapd error in yakkety, to report a bug. | 16:40 |
| elopio | also we are waiting on yakkety images for our CI lab. Soon we will catch these type of errors earlier. | 16:41 |
| elopio | bdmurray: do the autopkgtests get executed when the package is moved to proposed? Or they are only run when trying to migrate from proposed to updates? | 16:49 |
| apw | they are run when the package is fully in -proposed, the results then contribute to the decision to release to -updates | 16:50 |
| nacc | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html helps :) | 16:50 |
| elopio | nacc: that page doesn't show the results in xenial-proposed. Just yakkety. | 16:52 |
| Laney | that's http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/xenial/update_excuses.html | 16:53 |
| nacc | elopio: ah sorry, you're right | 16:53 |
| elopio | Laney: great. It's not there, but I supposed that's because it needs some time. | 16:54 |
| jbicha | could an AA take a look at bug 1585058? | 16:58 |
| ubot5 | bug 1585058 in pixfrogger (Ubuntu) "Sync pixfrogger 1.0-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1585058 | 16:58 |
| cjwatson | I think that just needs a member of the release team to force it despite the arch: all uninstallability | 17:01 |
| cjwatson | XS-Build-Indep-Architecture is working, but it doesn't affect proposed-migration's behaviour of checking arch: all installability on amd64 | 17:01 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Hrm. Since uninst counts are counted against only amd64 for arch:all (I think?), I wonder if teaching britney to check B-I-A and jigger the check for that source's binaries might be smart, to keep the count 0. | 18:17 |
| cjwatson | infinity: Wouldn't be a bad idea if it's reasonably easy. | 19:54 |
| sergiusens | bdmurray just in case http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/snapcraft/xenial/amd64/ :-) | 21:20 |
| bdmurray | sergiusens: I saw, thanks! | 21:21 |
| stokachu | infinity: get my email about getting the 'conjure 0.0.8' purged from the archive? | 21:34 |
| nacc | do i need to wait for php7.0-dev to make into release (to remove the last dep), or can I request an AA demote dh-php now, if it's showing up in (source & binary movements to universe) on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed ? | 21:54 |
| cjwatson | stokachu: Not that I saw the email, but we don't remove packages from the release pocket of stable suites (except that time when we had to due to a legal threat, but we don't talk about that). | 21:58 |
| stokachu | cjwatson: ok this was a request because of the name change that happened between conjure and conjure-up | 21:59 |
| stokachu | cjwatson: afraid users will be confused | 21:59 |
| cjwatson | stokachu: The most effective way to stop xenial users seeing it would be to change conjure-up in xenial-updates to ship a transitional package. | 21:59 |
| cjwatson | stokachu: That will be like 100x less effort. | 21:59 |
| stokachu | ah ok | 22:00 |
| stokachu | ill do that | 22:00 |
| nacc | well, now that php7.0-dev has moved to release, can an AA demote dh-php to universe? | 23:36 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!