[10:11] <ginggs> pitti, slangasek: i've expanded the info in LP: #1556685 and uploaded the oce SRU again
[15:51] <sergiusens> bdmurray or slangasek care to approve snapcraft into xenial-proposed?
[15:52] <bdmurray> sergiusens: I'll take a look
[15:53] <sergiusens> ty
[15:54] <mardy> hi all, can please someone help me with this: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/yakkety/update_excuses.html#account-plugins
[15:54] <mardy> the ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts is already in yakkety
[15:54] <mardy> so I don't understand what the account-plugins package is waiting for
[15:55] <nacc> mardy: component mismatch
[15:55] <nacc> mardy: account-plugins is in main
[15:55] <nacc> mardy: ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts is in universe
[15:56] <nacc> (and account-plugin-owncloud is in main too)
[15:57] <mardy> nacc: OK... so, if I wanted to move account-plugin-owncloud to universe, how should I do that? is it a matter of changing debian/control?
[15:57] <nacc> mardy: i think that's indicated here: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed for account-plugin-owncloud
[15:57] <nacc> mardy: no, someone (an AA? not sure where this permission starts to be granted) has to demote it
[15:57] <nacc> it's on the list already, afaict
[15:59] <mardy> nacc: OK. Would you suggest someone to ping, just to be sure?
[15:59] <cjwatson> AA, yes.  I'll do it
[15:59] <nacc> cjwatson: thanks! (and noted who has those rights)
[15:59] <mardy> cjwatson: thanks!
[16:00] <bdmurray> sergiusens: Why is 2.11+16.10 still in proposed?
[16:01] <cjwatson> (done)
[16:03] <bdmurray> sergiusens: it looks like an amd64 test regression - http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/snapcraft/yakkety/amd64
[16:23] <sergiusens> bdmurray oh, snapd in -proposed might be hitting us there (which also fails)
[16:24] <sergiusens> elopio care to look at that? ^
[16:25] <bdmurray> sergiusens: I don't think its snapd related Get:24 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu yakkety/main amd64 snapd amd64 2.0.2 [4,011 kB]
[16:25] <bdmurray> sergiusens: from https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-yakkety/yakkety/amd64/s/snapcraft/20160610_090430@/log.gz
[16:27] <sergiusens> bdmurray heh snapd on xenial-updates is already 2.0.5...
[16:27] <bdmurray> sergiusens: my concern is that if the yakkety autopkgtests are failing, they'll likely fail for xenial too
[16:28] <sergiusens> bdmurray the error is from snapd, not much we can do but disable the tests
[16:28] <sergiusens> bdmurray they won't
[16:28] <bdmurray> okay
[16:29] <sergiusens> bdmurray all our code changes run adt for xenial https://github.com/ubuntu-core/snapcraft/pull/559
[16:30] <sergiusens> bdmurray you will need vpn to see the results, but we do run
[16:31] <bdmurray> sergiusens: okay, I'll approve it
[16:35] <bdmurray> sergiusens: oh and fwiw snapcraft.io/create never loads for me
[16:35] <didrocks> bdmurray: normal, it will be on on tuesday
[16:36] <didrocks> the goal is to have the tour available by then
[16:39] <elopio> bdmurray: thanks.
[16:40] <elopio> and yes, we won't release this until next week. We just want to be ready for when the site is ready.
[16:40] <elopio> I'm trying to reproduce the snapd error in yakkety, to report a bug.
[16:41] <elopio> also we are waiting on yakkety images for our CI lab. Soon we will catch these type of errors earlier.
[16:49] <elopio> bdmurray: do the autopkgtests get executed when the package is moved to proposed? Or they are only run when trying to migrate from proposed to updates?
[16:50] <apw> they are run when the package is fully in -proposed, the results then contribute to the decision to release to -updates
[16:50] <nacc> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html helps :)
[16:52] <elopio> nacc: that page doesn't show the results in xenial-proposed. Just yakkety.
[16:53] <Laney> that's http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/xenial/update_excuses.html
[16:53] <nacc> elopio: ah sorry, you're right
[16:54] <elopio> Laney: great. It's not there, but I supposed that's because it needs some time.
[16:58] <jbicha> could an AA take a look at bug 1585058?
[17:01] <cjwatson> I think that just needs a member of the release team to force it despite the arch: all uninstallability
[17:01] <cjwatson> XS-Build-Indep-Architecture is working, but it doesn't affect proposed-migration's behaviour of checking arch: all installability on amd64
[18:17] <infinity> cjwatson: Hrm.  Since uninst counts are counted against only amd64 for arch:all (I think?), I wonder if teaching britney to check B-I-A and jigger the check for that source's binaries might be smart, to keep the count 0.
[19:54] <cjwatson> infinity: Wouldn't be a bad idea if it's reasonably easy.
[21:20] <sergiusens> bdmurray just in case http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/snapcraft/xenial/amd64/ :-)
[21:21] <bdmurray> sergiusens: I saw, thanks!
[21:34] <stokachu> infinity: get my email about getting the 'conjure 0.0.8' purged from the archive?
[21:54] <nacc> do i need to wait for php7.0-dev to make into release (to remove the last dep), or can I request an AA demote dh-php now, if it's showing up in (source & binary movements to universe) on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed ?
[21:58] <cjwatson> stokachu: Not that I saw the email, but we don't remove packages from the release pocket of stable suites (except that time when we had to due to a legal threat, but we don't talk about that).
[21:59] <stokachu> cjwatson: ok this was a request because of the name change that happened between conjure and conjure-up
[21:59] <stokachu> cjwatson: afraid users will be confused
[21:59] <cjwatson> stokachu: The most effective way to stop xenial users seeing it would be to change conjure-up in xenial-updates to ship a transitional package.
[21:59] <cjwatson> stokachu: That will be like 100x less effort.
[22:00] <stokachu> ah ok
[22:00] <stokachu> ill do that
[23:36] <nacc> well, now that php7.0-dev has moved to release, can an AA demote dh-php to universe?