[00:21] <nacc> pitti: i've sent the php-imagick merge to rbasak to review, it builds fine with dh-php (once demoted to universe). I'm working on testing it now
[00:22] <nacc> autopkgtest'ing it, that is
[00:29] <nacc> looks like the tests pass
[00:30] <doko> kees, send a patch? I haven't looked yet at this
[00:35] <infinity> nacc: I can have a look in a bit, if you can point me to what needs bootstrapping.
[00:41] <nacc> infinity: yep, let me provide you a set of clean steps (it's short)
[00:43] <infinity> nacc: Sure, just pastebin it or something, and I'll have a gander after I eat dinner.
[00:48] <nacc> infinity: http://paste.ubuntu.com/17193377/
[00:49] <nacc> just real tight loop of deps that is preventing phpunit from updating
[04:59] <jhenke> Hi, I would like to get bug 1585928 nominated as SRU for xenial, on #ubuntu-bug I was not able to reach someone doing it for a week now, can anybody here help? It is fairly trivial change, but helps a log.
[09:45] <ginggs> jhenke: done
[09:48] <jhenke> ginggs thanks!
[09:50] <jhenke> so I hope it will go into xenial soon, maybe next week
[10:20] <ginggs> jhenke: are you going to attach a debdiff to the bug?
[10:21] <jhenke> I don't know how to
[10:22] <ginggs> jhenke: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing
[10:25] <jhenke> but I can't update the changelog for the SRU yet?
[10:27] <ginggs> jhenke: sorry, i don't follow
[10:28] <jhenke> the page says you should update the packge's changelog with dch
[10:28] <jhenke> but I think the changelog should be done by the person uploading?
[10:31] <pitti> infinity: raspi2> I can reproduce the bug, retries don't help; if it's urgent, hint it, otherwise I'll fix the bug and retry afterwards
[10:31] <ginggs> no, you can prepare the complete upload including the changelog.  The person doing the upload is essentially just sponsoring what you have prepared
[10:31] <pitti> bdmurray: restart tgt> recycle icon on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/wily/update_excuses.html
[10:31] <ginggs> jhenke: ^
[10:31] <pitti> nacc: yay
[10:32] <jhenke> okay, so something like "no change upload to xenial"?
[10:32] <pitti> slangasek: ack; seems it's all good now, after the gammaray demote-to-proposed it all landed \o/
[10:34] <ginggs> jhenke: no, i think you should start at 0.33ubuntu3 and apply just the fix you need.  call it 0.33ubuntu3.1 or similar (it has to be lower than what is in yakkety)
[10:34] <jhenke> okay
[10:36] <ginggs> jhenke: see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure point 5 - 1
[11:25] <jhenke> ginggs thanks, I'll try to do it
[14:32] <slangasek> pitti: curious, why did gammaray need demoted to proposed? (it's certainly made it back into yakkety now)
[16:36] <ginggs> slangasek, pitti: i think the gammaray's arm64 and i386 binaries needed to be removed
[16:36] <ginggs> at least update_excuses explicitly mentioned arm64
[16:50] <nacc> infinity: were you able to get to the bootstrap? just checking in, if the instructions were ok
[18:17] <slangasek> ginggs: but I had removed those already :)
[18:17] <slangasek> ginggs: and it looks like they are gone so all is well
[18:22] <LocutusOfBorg> does anybody have experience about ocaml transition?
[18:22] <LocutusOfBorg> I can't figure out what needs rebuilding for that
[18:56] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: you might want to mine the history of lp:~ubuntu-transition-trackers/ubuntu-transition-tracker/configs/ for past examples
[18:57] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: or maybe http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/ which points to ocaml will already tell something :)
[21:13] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, I know the permanent transition, but I don't know how the ABI changes propagate :)