[00:34] <Logan> this is weird
[00:35] <Logan> I can't mark a bug as affecting Precise - it just says "Nominated for Precise by..."
[00:35] <Logan> I was able to just add releases to bugs in the past o_O
[05:48] <apw> Logan, sometimes that happens when you are using the "wrong" package where a bug has tasks for more than one
[06:11] <Logan> apw: weird. it's Bug 659742, which only has Ubuntu and Debian tasks
[06:20] <jbicha> maybe it's because zephyr was in main for precise, according to rmadison
[06:28] <infinity> Logan: Approved the nomination.  The internet here is too crap for me to figure out why it didn't work for you.
[06:29] <Logan> jbicha: you're totally right! that makes sense
[06:29] <Logan> infinity: thanks, as always :)
[08:10] <flexiondotorg> infinity, I'm not able to request rebuilds on iso.qa.
[08:10] <flexiondotorg> Or rather, I can request them, but nothing happens.
[08:11] <flexiondotorg> At least from from I have access to, nothing is started. No logs.
[08:11] <flexiondotorg> Daily builds are obviously working though.
[08:11] <ogra_> do you perhaps still have a build queued that failed ?
[08:11] <flexiondotorg> ogra_, Not that I can see.
[08:12] <ogra_> iirc there used to be an issue wheer you had to cancel a build first before you could request a new one ... (but that was a while ago)
[08:12] <ogra_> not sure thats still the case though
[08:15] <flexiondotorg> ogra_, I'll have a tinker.
[08:16] <flexiondotorg> I'm trying to get Ubuntu MATE mostly following recommends and it will be helpful to rebuild on demand rather than wait a day :-)
[08:24] <infinity> flexiondotorg: Looking.
[08:24] <flexiondotorg> infinity, Cheers.
[08:25] <infinity> flexiondotorg: THere are no pending requests.
[08:25] <flexiondotorg> infinity, I have requested any today.
[08:25] <flexiondotorg> I tried a few times over the weekend.
[08:25] <flexiondotorg> Shall I request one now?
[08:28] <infinity> flexiondotorg: Sure.
[08:29] <flexiondotorg> infinity, Yakkety daily rebuild requested.
[08:29] <flexiondotorg> All archs.
[08:37] <infinity> flexiondotorg: Huh.  Definitely seems to be not doing a thing.
[08:38] <flexiondotorg> OK
[08:39] <infinity> *raise brow*
[08:39] <infinity> That's really wonderfully broken.
[08:40] <infinity> flexiondotorg: I might need some stgraber to figure out WTF.
[08:40] <infinity> stgraber: What timezone are you in?
[08:40] <flexiondotorg> infinity, OK, thanks for looking. Thought it was odd which is why I raised it.
[08:40] <Laney> Looks like s/Mate/MATE/ in etc/qa-products
[08:41] <Laney> I guess the thingies got renamed at some point, and this file needs to keep up
[08:41] <infinity> Hrm, why would things have been renamed?
[08:42] <infinity> Laney: I don't see how it's different from xenial...
[08:43] <Laney> Presumably the renaming affects all series then
[08:44]  * Laney tests
[08:44] <infinity> Laney: Although, you switched the name last year.  r1500.
[08:44] <Laney> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/347/builds/105083/testcases
[08:44] <Laney> totes
[08:46] <infinity> Laney: Right, okay, so you're implying someone did s/Mate/MATE/ in the tracker recently.  That would indeed explain this.
[08:47] <Laney> #ubuntu-release.log-20160422.gz:21/04 12:07:13 -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Mate Desktop amd64 [Xenial Final] has been marked as ready
[08:47] <infinity> Derp.
[08:47] <infinity> Laney: You fixing cdimage already, then?
[08:47] <Laney> Can do
[08:47] <infinity> Laney: I can, I'm there already.
[08:48] <infinity> Just didn't want to stop on toes.
[08:48] <Laney> oh
[08:48] <Laney> Well I just pushed it
[08:48] <Laney> You go pull that then
[08:48] <infinity> Heh.
[08:48] <infinity> Doing.
[08:48] <Laney> Committed revision 1600.
[08:48] <Laney> spooky
[08:48] <infinity> Hah.
[08:48] <infinity> So we get to rename it again for 1700.
[08:48] <infinity> Make a note.
[08:49] <infinity> That looks better.
[08:49] <infinity> flexiondotorg: Should build in 20s.
[08:50] <flexiondotorg> infinity, Laney Thank you!
[13:29] <flexiondotorg> Laney, the Ubuntu MATE rebuild earlier failed to a package mis match.
[13:30] <flexiondotorg> I can't Cancel the rebuild.
[13:30] <flexiondotorg> In order to try again.
[14:18] <infinity> flexiondotorg: Cancelled.
[14:32] <flexiondotorg> infinity, Thanks.
[16:30] <flexiondotorg> infinity, cyphermox If you could be so kind - https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mate-dev/livecd-rootfs/mate-compatbility/+merge/297219
[17:06] <attente> hi, what's the process for sru'ing a package that's fixed in debian? do i need to file an sru that points to the appropriate debian bugs? do i attach a debdiff with the debian changes?
[17:12] <teward> attente: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
[21:26] <sergiusens> slangasek bdmurray mind accepting snapcraft 2.11 into xenial if you have a moment?
[21:32] <bdmurray> sergiusens: could you be specific about your request? into -proposed or -updates?
[21:32] <sergiusens> bdmurray into updates
[21:33] <sergiusens> bdmurray specifically ( :-) ), snapcraft-2.11 that is in xenial-proposed to xenial-updates; everything has been marked verification-done
[21:34] <bdmurray> sergiusens: I'll have a look shortly
[21:40] <sergiusens> bdmurray thank you
[21:42] <bdmurray> sergiusens: oh, this is the one from last week to be released in a shorter time frame?
[21:43] <sergiusens> bdmurray yes
[21:44] <sergiusens> bdmurray in any case, we have been staying in -proposed for 2 days at most with all snapcraft releases
[21:53] <bdmurray> sergiusens: okay, its publication is now pending
[21:53] <sergiusens> thanks