=== SwissBot_ is now known as SwissBot [16:36] bluesabre unit - is there anything new that testing needs to worry about yet? [16:38] I vaguely know about the gtk3 stuff in ppa, but afaik that's not something people can really look at yet [17:35] PaulW2U: replied and cc'd release team in to it [17:49] PaulW2U: that's the way do to do it - ask on -release :) [17:50] we read things - but *we* can't always fix things - like the xfce/intel/lock bug [17:50] personally I wish that we were more blunt about not releasing [17:50] given that bug perhaps we shouldn't have done so [17:51] maybe that would make more noise - Xubuntu refuses to release LTS due to intel bug [17:51] :) [17:52] my xubuntu install is now on a non-Intel machine [17:52] my installs are not intel [17:52] hard one - and if QA had refused, I bet we would have released anyway [17:54] A a tester I get quite frustrated when I see little feedback from the main Ubuntu flavour hence my initial email [17:54] I know how Xubuntu and Lubuntu work but ubuntu mystifies me at times :) [17:55] hard one :) [17:55] I think that mostly that's done with autotesting - not real people working in the OS [17:56] davmor2 might be able to shine a light on that - might have EOD'd too [17:57] Yes, but Ubuntu 16.04 was still released with some awful bugs that fortunately were fix before the .1 release. [18:00] I see that bug 1568604 now has a heat of 980 and affects 199 people :( [18:00] bug 1568604 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) "Mouse cursor lost when unlocking with Intel graphics" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1568604 [18:03] at least the duplicate reports have slowed down. bye for now. off to watch tv. [18:25] meh [18:27] intel drivers would be the kernel and nothing to do with the desktop at all, so the x team and kernel team would be the best places to start [18:30] davmor2: always hard to tell where [18:32] davmor2: then again where the hell are the x and kernel teams :p [18:32] flocculant: #ubuntu-kernel [18:33] flocculant: they are hidden really well ;) [18:33] ha ha ha [18:33] it is holiday week :p [18:45] davmor2: all that said it *might* be a lock issue with not-gnome [18:46] or kde [18:46] whichever way you look it at it - not a nice bug [18:49] might be that x team and https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94677 is the way to do it, but I know so little about the intricacies I get lost [18:49] Freedesktop bug 94677 in Driver/intel "xorg-server 1.18.2: missing mouse pointer when coming back from screen lock" [Normal,New] [18:50] off to watch Iceland make Ronaldo look silly now :) [18:57] lol [19:59] just a really simple point here [20:00] I lost all my bookmarks - in fact lost everything [20:00] I can not find a simple link anywhere in Xubuntu land to add something to meeting agenda [20:00] and if I can't find that - do we hide that deliberately? [20:01] can get to it via wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu [20:01] should be simple to see pleia2 [20:01] which is pretty standard for most projects in Ubuntu, go to wiki page, find meeting info there [20:02] pleia2: I did normal thing with NO history - looked for Xubuntu [20:02] where do you suggest we put it? [20:02] found xubuntu.orgh [20:02] .org [20:02] no meeting there [20:02] xubuntu.org is our user facing website, we've put all the dev stuff on the wikis [20:03] pleia2: meetings are community not dev [20:03] indeed, which makes it tricky [20:04] not really :) [20:04] should be on x.org :) [20:04] then can you suggest a place on x.org for it? [20:04] that's what I'm asking [20:04] pleia2: thinking :) [20:04] see, tricky [20:04] I've searched the website some, maybe on the Contact page? but I'm not sure [20:05] maybe Contact page? [20:05] heh - similar thinking there :) [20:05] is that where you looked when you were trying to find it just now? [20:05] yup [20:05] first place I looked [20:05] ok, can you submit a bug so knome can look at it when he's home? [20:06] pleia2: yea ofc - xubuntu-website? [20:06] yep [20:06] k - cool :) [20:07] thanks [20:07] pleia2: also ofc - atm - stupid position for a wiki - how could Bert add something ... [20:08] who is Bert? [20:08] if that goes on for much longer - that's a real problem for *buntu [20:08] there's a team that you can ask popey to add people to, discussion is ongoing on the ubuntu-doc list [20:08] ~ubuntu-wiki-editors [20:09] can't request to join (flood of spam joins), but you can ask popey directly [20:09] bert is just this guy who realise there's a major issue with a wiki, can't change it, then just wanders off bad mouthing *buntu [20:09] yeah, you want the ubuntu-doc list for this discussion [20:09] there's nothing I can do about it, but folks are talking about it there [20:09] pleia2: I can edit - Bert can't, now thinks Ubuntu is what they say it is :( [20:10] I understand, but telling me doesn't help [20:10] it's a very clear and known problem that's being discussed on the doc list [20:10] pleia2: right - not going there - been down that street before [20:10] x_x [20:11] discussing is great - IS doidn't care about spam till it hurt them [20:11] anyway, back to work for me [20:11] you can directly quote me to IS [20:11] *I* can't continue to be the one responsible for this [20:11] pleia2: yea - sorry xxx [20:12] the group exists that you can ask popey to add people to, the doc team is sorting out joining criteria to make this easier [23:29] flocculant: nothing from me at this time