[00:44] isnt popcorntime pretty much a warez only program [00:46] yes === IdleOne is now known as Guest99325 [04:14] all in favor of stevendale permaban say "AYE". [05:07] oh boy what now? [05:36] the pinging people? [06:17] In #lubuntu, cooldharma06 said: ubottu thansk for the info, is there any way to do manually or it will make any issues [08:07] phunyguy: just get rid of him, he's another one who adds no value === nik0 is now known as niko [11:09] maybe I need to tone down my snark. Sorry. [11:09] I don't think so === Guest99325 is now known as IdleOne [14:32] elky, yeah the constant join and ping [16:18] I wonder if I still remember how to do factoid edits [16:22] there, fixed [17:29] woo [20:22] dax: he is right. ethOS is not giving out the sourcecode. so they are violating the gpl there. [20:23] did you buy it and then contact them and ask for source? [20:23] they don't need to proactively make it available to non-customers [20:23] anyways, the email I gave him is the correct place to report it assuming they are in fact not distributing source at all [20:24] afaik they need to give it out even if you dont pay for it. that is all the sense behind the gpl. [20:25] I'm sure someone at Canonical will figure it out. Their lawyers always seem ready to leap out of the bushes. [20:26] k1l_: oh, sorry, yes, you're correct about that [20:27] so, i wonder if they make "a written offer, valid for at least three years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code" to people who buy and download it ;) [20:27] in general, cryptocurrency people are idiotic enough that i highly doubt they did, but who knows. and yeah, it's big-C's problem really [20:28] (does FSF even do GPL enforcement for coreutils and other GNU stuff these days?) [21:57] dax: used to, until recently (at least). There was a site where they would show violations of the GPL, and results [21:59] yes. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.en.html and http://gpl-violations.org/ [22:00] and I remember FSF being active on violations (for a somewhat undefined "active") [22:01] is the latter actually an FSF project? [22:01] or, like, actually FSF affiliated [22:03] b/c the compliance work i've seen recently seems to mostly be FSFE and Conservancy [22:04] I remember Harald's work from a few years ago. He/They helped a lot (mostly in Germany) [22:05] but -- just checked -- and the mailing list host seems to be down [22:06] so... since you have to have the copyright owner complaining... GPL violations are iffy. For the FSF packages, they do follow up [22:06] for others... perhaps Canonical, Red Hat === ikonia_ is now known as ikonia