[00:18] <mterry> trainguards: a u8 silo landed a while ago today, and the package migrated to main a couple hours ago, but trunk has not been updated with the new code -- any ideas why?
[00:43] <mterry> trainguards: looks like signon-apparmor-extension didn't get updated in xenial in the overlay PPA from silo 65 -- I'm guessing that's preventing the train from completing the steps (like merging code to trunk)
[00:43] <mterry> tedg, ^
[01:04]  * mterry fixed the train thing
[02:21] <robru> mterry: huh, publish log clearly shows that copy happening, not sure why it didn't go
[06:24] <robru> kenvandine: around? can you rebuild https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1551 ? I need to test something
[06:24] <robru> >:-)
[06:26] <robru> lol 2am in NC, I fail at TZs
[07:17] <robru> cmoooooooon somebody build something!
[07:22] <robru> pstolowski: lol thx
[07:23] <pstolowski> :D
[07:23] <pstolowski> robru, my pleasure
[07:24] <robru> pstolowski: I just decreased the verbosity of the build job logging, wanted to see a real-world example without building somebody else's silo
[07:24] <pstolowski> robru, heh, i see :)
[07:25] <robru> pstolowski: looks great, thanks
[07:26] <pstolowski> robru, one more coming ;)
[07:26] <robru> yasssss
[07:47] <robru> blah
[08:00] <davmor2> Morning all
[09:04] <dbarth> sil2100: hey, so i can mark approve the silo for now (ubuntu-html6-laucnher)?
[09:05] <dbarth> sil2100: at least if that helps, as i think the actual landing should be gated by the sdk ppa seed change
[09:05] <dbarth> bzoltan_: wdyt ^^ ?
[09:05] <sil2100> dbarth: yeah, it's fine to land that I suppose :)
[10:11] <Saviq> seb128, hey, could you please ♻ https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1483/landing-025-xenial/excuses.html for me, thanks :)
[10:19] <seb128> Saviq, done
[11:49] <sil2100> Elleo: hey! Did the new fonts-emojione package get a preNEW review?
[11:56] <Elleo> sil2100: yep, seb128 reviewed it yesterday
[12:05] <sil2100> Elleo: ok, so it's good to land then I suppose?
[12:05] <sil2100> seb128: can you just formally confirm that fonts-emojione is approved by an archive admin?
[12:05] <sil2100> (preNEW)
[12:07] <Elleo> sil2100: there's a comment from seb128 on the MR here: https://code.launchpad.net/~michael-sheldon/emojione/no-op/+merge/297506
[12:07] <sil2100> \o/
[12:09] <sil2100> Elleo: hm, strange
[12:09] <sil2100> Elleo: why is the silo using this branch for merging, since it's already merged?
[12:09] <sil2100> https://code.launchpad.net/~michael-sheldon/emojione/2.2.2/+merge/297477
[12:09] <Elleo> sil2100: ah, woops, I meant to replace it with the no-op MR
[12:09] <sil2100> Elleo: shouldn't the no-op branch be used instead?
[12:09] <Elleo> sil2100: the end result package wise will be the same though
[12:10] <Elleo> sil2100: do you want me to rebuild it with the no-op one?
[12:10] <sil2100> hm, let me ask robru what he thinks
[12:10] <Elleo> okay
[12:12] <robru> sil2100: Elleo: I don't see any reason to change it at this point.
[12:13] <sil2100> Let's try this then
[12:13] <robru> sil2100: Elleo: as long as you're happy with the changelog that was generated, that would be the only reason to change it
[12:13] <sil2100> We're on a sprint together so he can fix things if they get broken ;p
[12:13] <Elleo> okay, cool
[12:15] <sil2100> dbarth: hey! How's the oxide-qt arm64 build going? I see a silo for it, but empty ;)
[12:15] <sil2100> dbarth: no pressure, but oxide is the last piece right now..!
[12:22] <rvr> ChrisTownsend: Silo 49 approved
[12:22] <ChrisTownsend> rvr: Sweet!  Thanks!
[12:28] <rvr> mardy: dbarth: Silo 5 is described as "Implement 2FA for OA" but says "The 2FA part is there to be used by the upcoming U1 plugin which is developed in another silo". Is the other silo ready?
[12:29] <mardy> rvr: no, the only thing that can be tested now is the password query dialog
[12:30] <rvr> mardy: Then either remove that feature until it can be tested or I'll block the silo until the other is ready.
[12:31] <mardy> rvr: well, it's not harmful to land it, it cannot be triggered
[13:00] <Saviq> jibel, davmor2, note ubuntu-settings-components just got published so neded to rebuild that in silo 25
[13:01] <Saviq> +e
[13:01] <Saviq> does not affect anything other than the huge network icons so testing may continue
[13:12] <Saviq> also, davmor2, Bug #1435923 was incorrectly linked there
[13:17] <rvr> mardy: The idea of QA is to assure the quality of the code that lands. Merging un-validated code bypasses QA, and we don't want to do that.
[13:19] <mardy> rvr: well, the silo (and that same branch) contain other changes, but none are critical, so I'm fine with waiting
[13:19] <rvr> mardy: Ack
[13:23] <rvr> dbarth_: Hi, just received a card for silo 58, but it needs rebuilding.
[13:28] <dbarth_> rvr: we'll postpone to monday; i'd like to make sure the last branch is reviewed again
[13:28] <rvr> dbarth_: Ok
[13:28] <dbarth_> i'll do the rebuild on monday
[13:28] <dbarth_> rvr: but functionnaly it is operational
[13:28] <dbarth_> you can enjoy the appear.in webap on your phone, at long last
[15:42] <marcustomlinson> trainguards: question: do no-change-rebuild MPs not get marked as Merged when they land in a silo?
[15:42] <marcustomlinson> E.g. https://code.launchpad.net/~thomas-voss/platform-api/no-change-rebuild/+merge/296017 and https://code.launchpad.net/~marcustomlinson/unity-scopes-shell/no-change-rebuild/+merge/296019
[15:42] <marcustomlinson> they "landed" in https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1451
[15:42] <marcustomlinson> but are not marked as such
[15:45] <robru> marcustomlinson: that's a question for lp people, train doesn't mark merges, lp does
[15:45] <marcustomlinson> robru: ok, (I actually pinged you there ;))
[15:46] <robru> marcustomlinson: ping an lp person 👅
[15:50] <Elleo> trainguards: I seem to recall this silo needs some sort of manual publishing stage now that its approved due to the manual rebuild upload that happened in yakkety: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1491
[15:55] <robru> Elleo: there is no such thing as auto publishing, so that just requires regular publishing like anything else
[15:57] <Elleo> robru: ah, okay
[15:59] <robru> Elleo: so you should hit publish yourself and then if it doesn't work, get a core dev to do it, maybe Ken is around
[16:01] <Elleo> robru: okay
[16:07] <robru> kenvandine: pls help Elleo publish, I'm off for dinner
[16:10] <mterry> robru: I just found a bileto ui bug?  I have a silo with two MPs for two different projects in it.  I added a third MP for a third project.  When I go to click build, I only see checkboxes for the first two projects.  Leaving them blank will build my new project, but also the first two, which I didn't need to do
[16:48] <Laney> 17/06 16:47:16 -queuebot:#ubuntu-ci-eng- Laney, https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1558 Too many merge targets: ['lp:ubuntu-themes', 'lp:~ubuntu-art-pkg/ubuntu-themes/16.04']
[16:48] <Laney> I thought this was the way to do devel + stable upload
[16:49] <Laney> what *is* the way? :)
[16:57] <dobey> Laney: that doesn't seem right
[16:59] <dobey> Laney: also https://code.launchpad.net/~willcooke/ubuntu-themes/progress-bars/+merge/297790 results in conflict in debian/changelog
[16:59] <dobey> and also apparently pulls in more changes which aren't in that stable branch
[17:00] <dobey> Laney: are you trying to land this in y and SRU to xenial too?
[17:00] <Laney> really I was just seeing if it would work
[18:32] <robru> Laney: what are you expecting to happen? Train builds yakkety for trunk then copies for older series
[18:33] <robru> Laney: you must target all MPs at same trunk
[18:34] <dobey> robru: shouldn't you be enjoying greece or something
[18:35] <robru> mterry: yes unavoidable unfortunately, it detects the packages at build time
[18:35] <mterry> ah well
[18:36] <robru> mterry: you can add the package to the sources list by hand
[18:36] <mterry> robru, ah that sticks?  hmm
[18:36] <mterry> robru, good workaround, thanks
[18:36] <robru> dobey: been out all day, now I enjoy AC
[18:37] <robru> mterry: yw
[18:39] <dobey> heh
[18:46] <robru> Laney: if you are tracking two different branches you need two tickets. The dual silos build all series off one trunk
[19:50] <Saviq> mterry, publish https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1483 please? :)
[20:19] <Saviq> kenvandine, if around, could you publish https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1483 for me please?
[21:33] <Saviq> mterry, you back? publish silo 25 please?
[21:33] <Saviq> think I caught you in a time out before
[21:39] <dobey> heh, nope
[21:39] <dobey> maybe kenvandine can do it? ^^
[22:12] <Laney> robru: Merge each branch into the target of the MP and then build the resulting packages