[01:33] New background images, fourth try- here: geirdal.is/index.php/studio-0 [17:53] sakrecoer: to clarify, either day (21, or 23) is fine for me. :) [18:49] what time is it for me GMT [19:02] background images as suggested by Ralf, it is not nice to call geometric art logs! I dont want to make this. [19:02] geirdal.is/index.php/studio-0 [19:03] fifth try! [19:24] whoa, radical change to the first image geirdal [19:32] geirdal: re what you said on off-topic, I actually think set 4 might work just fine (and the first image might even work better than the flat one. main issue is having enough brightness contrast between the white text and the background [19:32] which front graphic of 4 does better than 5 [19:33] aggree [19:35] I will make a new version based on 4 [19:35] with more contrast [19:35] more contrast with the text right? [19:36] right [19:36] I think this might be fine [19:36] maybe a bit less contrast within the image. (so that it is the same amount of contrast the section ones have) [19:36] but seriously [19:36] it might be readable as it is [19:37] its a bit busy [19:37] but.. yeah, do you have a copy of the image without the text on top? [19:37] we will see, its good to have something to choose from [19:37] ofcours [19:38] *nods* [19:38] i will post a link [19:40] thanks :D [19:49] it need more work on the contrast but I think we are on the right track http://geirdal.is/index.php/studio-0 [19:53] they arre in 1280 × 720 pixels like sakrekoer suggested to me [19:56] *replaces it at the feature test [19:57] send me link, Ive lost it :P [19:58] this one ? http://www.ubuntustudio.zequence.net/feature-test/ [19:58] yep [19:58] sorry I was just logging in [19:58] ok ;) [20:05] take the backround of the text autumna, can you do that :) [20:05] actually I was just doing that [20:06] done [20:06] :)))) [20:07] good readability? Yes [20:07] yeah I don't see any major issues with it [20:07] well [20:07] ok it still is very busy [20:07] which is not ideal [20:07] but I will also still try to see if I can add the blur in there [20:10] ok