[08:04] <LocutusOfBorg> please remove pepperflashplugin-nonfree[i386] following the same removal in debian, following the removal from google (upstream) of the deb
[10:17] <mapreri> how can I confirm that scribus' SRU is fully phased out and will be in the next point releasE?
[10:18] <mapreri> (i received an email back then that it was blocked because of a new crash appeared in errors.u.c, but I'm not sure if it's already unblocked or what
[10:18] <mapreri> )
[10:19] <LocutusOfBorg> link please
[10:19] <mapreri> to what?
[10:19] <LocutusOfBorg> errors page
[10:21] <mapreri> https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/296f63e4d068bd1e0cbcfbedef5e74e9ecfc524d
[10:21] <LocutusOfBorg> sending the content privately
[10:22] <mapreri> erm, I can't actually
[10:22] <mapreri> ah,
[10:22] <LocutusOfBorg> I am sending you the content of the page
[10:22] <mapreri> well, I *can* read the error :)
[10:23] <mapreri> i don't know if that thing has been ignored and the phased continued, or what
[10:23] <LocutusOfBorg> ohh, ok
[10:24] <Laney> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/phased-updates.html
[10:24] <Laney> AFAIK if it's not there and is in -updates then it's fully phased
[10:24] <mapreri> Laney: ok.  I was a bit perplexed because even right after I received the email it was not on that list, and neither it was the day after…
[10:24] <mapreri> (mail from June 8th
[10:25] <mapreri> Laney: Thanks!
[16:55] <infinity> xnox: ^-- For you.
[17:42] <ginggs> hi infinity: would you have a look at the cacti SRU please?  also we are thinking of a bof/sprint for some fpc stuff http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/Week-of-Mon-20160613/001284.html
[21:17] <mwhudson> my kingdom for someone to look at the yakkety NEW queue
[21:28] <slangasek> mwhudson: tell me more about this kingdom
[21:28] <slangasek> mwhudson: why does lintian report dev-pkg-without-shlib-symlink for libgolang-1.6-std1?
[21:29] <mwhudson> slangasek: ah, because i forgot to update overrides i bet
[21:29] <mwhudson> yes
[21:29] <slangasek> but why does lintian say it's a dev package, at all?
[21:29] <mwhudson> oh
[21:29] <mwhudson> that is a good question
[21:31] <slangasek> mwhudson: as this is precisely the new binary package in the queue, I think we need to get to the bottom of that before I'll accept this into the archive
[21:32] <mwhudson> is it just lintian being strange and reporting it against the lib package rather than the -dev package?
[21:32] <slangasek> don't know
[21:32] <slangasek> if I run lintian against the individual .debs, the warning isn't reported for either
[21:32]  * mwhudson reads some perl
[21:33] <slangasek> if I run it against the amd64.changes, it tags it on libstd1
[21:33] <mwhudson> lintian is definitely looking at the pair of packages together
[21:34] <mwhudson> and in a sense, the warning is perfectly valid
[21:34] <mwhudson> there is no symlink
[21:34] <mwhudson> or at least, not where lintian expects it
[21:34] <mwhudson> but that's because the go linker does not look for files in the same places as the system linker
[21:34] <slangasek> ok
[21:35] <slangasek> yeah if I pass those two packages to lintian together on the commandline the warning comes back
[21:35] <mwhudson> so once all this stuff is bedded down, i should make some lintian changes around go shared libraries
[21:36] <mwhudson> i actually have a trello card about this already :-)
[21:36] <slangasek> mwhudson: packages accepted; does your kingdom have a swimming pool?
[21:37] <mwhudson> slangasek: thanks
[21:37] <tsimonq2> the Lubuntu images aren't being generated
[21:37] <mwhudson> slangasek: only wellington harbour and it's a bit cold at this time of year
[21:37] <tsimonq2> the directory is being created for the daily images, just not being populated
[21:37] <tsimonq2> could somebody look into this?
[21:37] <mwhudson> slangasek: there is going to be a steady drip of golang shared lib NEW queue things i guess
[21:37] <mwhudson> slangasek: also aren't you on leave today? :)
[21:38] <slangasek> mwhudson: I am, which means you won't have me to hand for the next bit of NEW processing ;)
[21:39] <mwhudson> well there are 10 or so packages that i can do this for and as i should actually read the debdiffs properly and write proper descriptions for the archive, i'll probably be ok for a while :)
[21:45] <infinity> tsimonq2: Fixing.
[21:47] <infinity> tsimonq2: Should be fixed for the next daily.
[22:02] <tsimonq2> thank you infinity
[22:25] <mwhudson> infinity: could you look at the xenial containerd/docker.io/runc srus pls? we'd like to get them done before dockercon which is soon