| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === Cimi_ is now known as cimi | ||
| pstolowski | rvr, ping | 08:37 |
|---|---|---|
| rvr | pstolowski: pong | 09:29 |
| pstolowski | rvr, hey, have you seen the emails I sent this morning? can we reconsider silo 1? | 09:33 |
| rvr | pstolowski: Nope, let me read them | 09:33 |
| pstolowski | rvr, flickr scope was flaky imo, the new one Enwei included works fine for me | 09:33 |
| rvr | pstolowski: Ah, I see. | 09:37 |
| rvr | pstolowski: But, are we sure this scope is going to land in OTA12? | 09:38 |
| pstolowski | rvr, that's what Enwei said.. it's under control of his team | 09:38 |
| mardy | trainguards: can you help me understand this problem? https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1497/landing-059-xenial/excuses.html | 09:43 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| robru | mardy: did you stop building the package named there? | 09:45 |
| sil2100 | robru, mardy: I think I know what's up | 09:46 |
| sil2100 | It's probably because some old accounts-plugin package was built there | 09:46 |
| sil2100 | https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-059/+packages?field.name_filter=account-plugins&field.status_filter=&field.series_filter= | 09:46 |
| robru | sil2100: I think delete superceded uploads in that PPA | 09:46 |
| sil2100 | mardy, robru: let me fix that ^ | 09:46 |
| sil2100 | Yeah | 09:46 |
| sil2100 | That's what I wanted to do, we had that once already | 09:47 |
| sil2100 | mardy: should be good with the next britney run | 09:47 |
| robru | sil2100: yeah, thanks for taking care of that 😉 | 09:48 |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| mardy | sil2100, robru: thanks guys! Let me know, if I should add a Conflicts for that old package, to force its removal | 09:53 |
| rvr | mzanetti_: How can I test that libertine-scope can directly activate things? | 10:31 |
| mzanetti_ | rvr, installing that scope and launching something :) | 10:32 |
| mzanetti_ | hmm... actually, I'm not 100% sure if the scope does that already... | 10:32 |
| mzanetti_ | rvr, I've tested it by looking at the debug prints in the scope backend | 10:32 |
| dbarth_ | jibel: ping? can you check silo 19; i still can't find it in trello | 10:45 |
| dbarth_ | it contains a high prio fix for webrtc apps | 10:46 |
| dbarth_ | thanks | 10:48 |
| robru | dbarth_: you should probably find a core dev to hit retry on the unity8 regression in that silo, if it's a flaky/transient failure | 10:50 |
| mzanetti_ | robru, you still on hols? | 11:22 |
| === mzanetti_ is now known as mzanetti | ||
| robru | mzanetti: yes | 11:25 |
| robru | mzanetti: all week | 11:25 |
| mzanetti | robru, ok, where should I report bugs for bileto in the meantime? | 11:26 |
| robru | mzanetti: file against lp:bileto | 11:26 |
| robru | mzanetti: if it's totally critical blocker I'll take a look | 11:26 |
| mzanetti | ack, now the other question, what the hell are you doing here? | 11:26 |
| robru | mzanetti: if it's just annoying / has a workaround, I'll look next week | 11:26 |
| === iahmad_ is now known as iahmad | ||
| robru | mzanetti: it's 42 degrees in greece so I'm enjoying some AC until it cools off this evening | 11:26 |
| mzanetti | have a nice day! | 11:26 |
| robru | mzanetti: thanks | 11:27 |
| rvr | pstolowski: Silo 1 approved. Let's make sure that the new flickr scope arrives to images. | 11:38 |
| pstolowski | rvr, awesome, thanks! | 11:38 |
| pstolowski | mzanetti, ^ | 11:39 |
| mzanetti | rvr, pstolowski, thanks | 11:56 |
| mzanetti | bregma, hey, the direct activation branch for the libertine scope is about to land, just got QA approved | 11:56 |
| Wellark | trainguards: what should I do with this: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1342 | 12:15 |
| Wellark | the code got merged a while back | 12:15 |
| Wellark | but the ticket remained | 12:15 |
| Wellark | so, should I hit Finalize or Abandon? | 12:15 |
| robru | Wellark: so you're saying the code was merged even though the silo was never published? Why did that happen? | 12:17 |
| Wellark | robru: I don't know, it might have been published, I was on holiday and dobey did some magic | 12:18 |
| robru | Wellark: was that MP included on a different ticket? | 12:18 |
| jgdx | rvr, hey, are you testing s41? | 12:19 |
| rvr | jgdx: It is not in trello | 12:19 |
| Wellark | robru: oh, might be | 12:20 |
| Wellark | robru: so this one can just be cancelled | 12:20 |
| Wellark | *abandoned | 12:20 |
| jgdx | rvr, okay | 12:20 |
| rvr | jgdx: Wasn't marked as Ready for QA | 12:21 |
| rvr | jgdx: Automated sign-off was running this morning | 12:21 |
| jgdx | rvr, it failed? /me looks | 12:21 |
| jgdx | still running | 12:21 |
| jgdx | okay | 12:21 |
| robru | Wellark: yeah trunk looks like it was released,so just abandon please | 12:22 |
| Wellark | robru: thanks! | 12:26 |
| robru | Wellark: you're welcome | 12:26 |
| abeato | sil2100, has the transition from pd finished? should I use a different channel for flashing frieza these days? (instead of ubuntu-touch/rc-proposed/bq-aquaris-pd.en) | 12:26 |
| sil2100 | abeato: not finished yet, the tarball testing didn't finish | 12:43 |
| abeato | sil2100, ok, thanks | 12:46 |
| === olli__ is now known as olli | ||
| === kyrofa_ is now known as kyrofa | ||
| alex-abreu | robru, ping | 13:17 |
| robru | alex-abreu: hi | 13:17 |
| alex-abreu | robru, hi | 13:17 |
| alex-abreu | robru, I have a signoff failure in silo 19, it seems to be related to https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1503/landing-019-yakkety/excuses.html unity8 timing test | 13:18 |
| robru | alex-abreu: so you need a core dev to hit retry on that | 13:18 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 13:18 |
| alex-abreu | alex-abreu, not sure if it is a glitch | 13:19 |
| alex-abreu | seems to be | 13:19 |
| alex-abreu | robru, arent you one? | 13:19 |
| robru | alex-abreu: no | 13:20 |
| sil2100 | Retried | 13:20 |
| alex-abreu | sil2100, thx | 13:20 |
| sil2100 | yw | 13:20 |
| alex-abreu | sil2100, hmm, did it fail again or hasnt run yet? | 13:33 |
| sil2100 | alex-abreu: hm, hard to say, maybe it still didn't run yet | 13:34 |
| === iahmad_ is now known as iahmad | ||
| alex-abreu | sil2100, sorry, can you retry again? mzanetti seems to confirm that the unity8 test failure for Y is a glitch | 13:43 |
| sil2100 | alex-abreu: sure | 13:43 |
| mzanetti | yeah... sorry :/ | 13:43 |
| sil2100 | Done | 13:43 |
| alex-abreu | sil2100, mzanetti it seemed to have failed again, jibel could QA force it through ? (silo 19) | 13:53 |
| mzanetti | tbh I'm struggling to believe it would be so fast :D | 13:53 |
| alex-abreu | mzanetti, ah possibly, ... I just check the ticket timestamp https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1503/landing-019-yakkety/excuses.html | 13:54 |
| robru | alex-abreu: mzanetti: sil2100: be sure to check the URL that the word 'regression' points to in order to tell if it's actually changed to a new failure or if it's still the old result. the excuses page is currently updating every 15 minutes. | 14:07 |
| === tyhicks` is now known as tyhicks | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| dobey | trainguards: how does one build only one of the source packages in a silo? in the jenkins build i could specify which packages to build in a text entry | 17:46 |
| robru | dobey: is this your first build of the ticket? | 17:46 |
| dobey | robru: no. found a bug in something else, and there's a branch for it now, so i want to add it to the ticket, but build only that | 17:47 |
| robru | dobey: ok so you don't see the checkboxes on the build job that allow you to just check off which packages to build? | 17:47 |
| dobey | with jenkins i could tell it to only build that source package | 17:47 |
| dobey | oh ok | 17:47 |
| dobey | robru: ah no, because the source package wasn't in the silo already | 17:48 |
| robru | dobey: there's a "bug" where it only offers that for the second and later builds because at the time of the first build it doesn't know what packages are there. | 17:48 |
| robru | dobey: anyway if it's not offering the checkbox edit the ticket and put the source package name in the sources field. that's where it gets the checkboxes from | 17:49 |
| dobey | yeah, did that and i see it now | 17:49 |
| dobey | robru: i guess this is a slightly different 'bug' from that, since the source package didn't previously exist in the silo | 17:49 |
| robru | dobey: no it's the same. the checkboxes are just drawn from what's written in the sources field, and the sources field is auto-populated by builds / scanning the PPA. so it's a chicken-and-egg thing | 17:50 |
| dobey | right | 17:50 |
| robru | dobey: I'm a bit annoyed with that, because in theory clicking the checkboxes is easier than typing the name in that jenkins field, but not if the checkboxes don't appear | 17:52 |
| robru | I'll have to make it scan the MPs at the time the ticket is created/updated or something, rather than waiting for builds. not sure how that'll work exactly... | 17:53 |
| dobey | robru: also maybe indent the checkboxes, and insert a <br/> or whatever, so they're on separate lines? :) | 17:54 |
| === iahmad_ is now known as iahmad | ||
| Wellark | trainguards: this claims regression, but I can't find anything in the log: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1324/landing-080-vivid/excuses.html | 19:58 |
| Wellark | two times in a row now | 19:58 |
| tedg | Wellark: I think it's still "in-progress" no? | 19:59 |
| tedg | Wait, that's armhf | 19:59 |
| Wellark | i386 shows regression | 20:00 |
| tedg | qmluitests.sh FAIL timed out | 20:00 |
| Wellark | oh.. | 20:01 |
| === olli__ is now known as olli | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!