=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === Cimi_ is now known as cimi [08:37] rvr, ping [09:29] pstolowski: pong [09:33] rvr, hey, have you seen the emails I sent this morning? can we reconsider silo 1? [09:33] pstolowski: Nope, let me read them [09:33] rvr, flickr scope was flaky imo, the new one Enwei included works fine for me [09:37] pstolowski: Ah, I see. [09:38] pstolowski: But, are we sure this scope is going to land in OTA12? [09:38] rvr, that's what Enwei said.. it's under control of his team [09:43] trainguards: can you help me understand this problem? https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1497/landing-059-xenial/excuses.html === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [09:45] mardy: did you stop building the package named there? [09:46] robru, mardy: I think I know what's up [09:46] It's probably because some old accounts-plugin package was built there [09:46] https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-059/+packages?field.name_filter=account-plugins&field.status_filter=&field.series_filter= [09:46] sil2100: I think delete superceded uploads in that PPA [09:46] mardy, robru: let me fix that ^ [09:46] Yeah [09:47] That's what I wanted to do, we had that once already [09:47] mardy: should be good with the next britney run [09:48] sil2100: yeah, thanks for taking care of that 😉 === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [09:53] sil2100, robru: thanks guys! Let me know, if I should add a Conflicts for that old package, to force its removal [10:31] mzanetti_: How can I test that libertine-scope can directly activate things? [10:32] rvr, installing that scope and launching something :) [10:32] hmm... actually, I'm not 100% sure if the scope does that already... [10:32] rvr, I've tested it by looking at the debug prints in the scope backend [10:45] jibel: ping? can you check silo 19; i still can't find it in trello [10:46] it contains a high prio fix for webrtc apps [10:48] thanks [10:50] dbarth_: you should probably find a core dev to hit retry on the unity8 regression in that silo, if it's a flaky/transient failure [11:22] robru, you still on hols? === mzanetti_ is now known as mzanetti [11:25] mzanetti: yes [11:25] mzanetti: all week [11:26] robru, ok, where should I report bugs for bileto in the meantime? [11:26] mzanetti: file against lp:bileto [11:26] mzanetti: if it's totally critical blocker I'll take a look [11:26] ack, now the other question, what the hell are you doing here? [11:26] mzanetti: if it's just annoying / has a workaround, I'll look next week === iahmad_ is now known as iahmad [11:26] mzanetti: it's 42 degrees in greece so I'm enjoying some AC until it cools off this evening [11:26] have a nice day! [11:27] mzanetti: thanks [11:38] pstolowski: Silo 1 approved. Let's make sure that the new flickr scope arrives to images. [11:38] rvr, awesome, thanks! [11:39] mzanetti, ^ [11:56] rvr, pstolowski, thanks [11:56] bregma, hey, the direct activation branch for the libertine scope is about to land, just got QA approved [12:15] trainguards: what should I do with this: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1342 [12:15] the code got merged a while back [12:15] but the ticket remained [12:15] so, should I hit Finalize or Abandon? [12:17] Wellark: so you're saying the code was merged even though the silo was never published? Why did that happen? [12:18] robru: I don't know, it might have been published, I was on holiday and dobey did some magic [12:18] Wellark: was that MP included on a different ticket? [12:19] rvr, hey, are you testing s41? [12:19] jgdx: It is not in trello [12:20] robru: oh, might be [12:20] robru: so this one can just be cancelled [12:20] *abandoned [12:20] rvr, okay [12:21] jgdx: Wasn't marked as Ready for QA [12:21] jgdx: Automated sign-off was running this morning [12:21] rvr, it failed? /me looks [12:21] still running [12:21] okay [12:22] Wellark: yeah trunk looks like it was released,so just abandon please [12:26] robru: thanks! [12:26] Wellark: you're welcome [12:26] sil2100, has the transition from pd finished? should I use a different channel for flashing frieza these days? (instead of ubuntu-touch/rc-proposed/bq-aquaris-pd.en) [12:43] abeato: not finished yet, the tarball testing didn't finish [12:46] sil2100, ok, thanks === olli__ is now known as olli === kyrofa_ is now known as kyrofa [13:17] robru, ping [13:17] alex-abreu: hi [13:17] robru, hi [13:18] robru, I have a signoff failure in silo 19, it seems to be related to https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1503/landing-019-yakkety/excuses.html unity8 timing test [13:18] alex-abreu: so you need a core dev to hit retry on that [13:18] o/ [13:19] alex-abreu, not sure if it is a glitch [13:19] seems to be [13:19] robru, arent you one? [13:20] alex-abreu: no [13:20] Retried [13:20] sil2100, thx [13:20] yw [13:33] sil2100, hmm, did it fail again or hasnt run yet? [13:34] alex-abreu: hm, hard to say, maybe it still didn't run yet === iahmad_ is now known as iahmad [13:43] sil2100, sorry, can you retry again? mzanetti seems to confirm that the unity8 test failure for Y is a glitch [13:43] alex-abreu: sure [13:43] yeah... sorry :/ [13:43] Done [13:53] sil2100, mzanetti it seemed to have failed again, jibel could QA force it through ? (silo 19) [13:53] tbh I'm struggling to believe it would be so fast :D [13:54] mzanetti, ah possibly, ... I just check the ticket timestamp https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1503/landing-019-yakkety/excuses.html [14:07] alex-abreu: mzanetti: sil2100: be sure to check the URL that the word 'regression' points to in order to tell if it's actually changed to a new failure or if it's still the old result. the excuses page is currently updating every 15 minutes. === tyhicks` is now known as tyhicks === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [17:46] trainguards: how does one build only one of the source packages in a silo? in the jenkins build i could specify which packages to build in a text entry [17:46] dobey: is this your first build of the ticket? [17:47] robru: no. found a bug in something else, and there's a branch for it now, so i want to add it to the ticket, but build only that [17:47] dobey: ok so you don't see the checkboxes on the build job that allow you to just check off which packages to build? [17:47] with jenkins i could tell it to only build that source package [17:47] oh ok [17:48] robru: ah no, because the source package wasn't in the silo already [17:48] dobey: there's a "bug" where it only offers that for the second and later builds because at the time of the first build it doesn't know what packages are there. [17:49] dobey: anyway if it's not offering the checkbox edit the ticket and put the source package name in the sources field. that's where it gets the checkboxes from [17:49] yeah, did that and i see it now [17:49] robru: i guess this is a slightly different 'bug' from that, since the source package didn't previously exist in the silo [17:50] dobey: no it's the same. the checkboxes are just drawn from what's written in the sources field, and the sources field is auto-populated by builds / scanning the PPA. so it's a chicken-and-egg thing [17:50] right [17:52] dobey: I'm a bit annoyed with that, because in theory clicking the checkboxes is easier than typing the name in that jenkins field, but not if the checkboxes don't appear [17:53] I'll have to make it scan the MPs at the time the ticket is created/updated or something, rather than waiting for builds. not sure how that'll work exactly... [17:54] robru: also maybe indent the checkboxes, and insert a
or whatever, so they're on separate lines? :) === iahmad_ is now known as iahmad [19:58] trainguards: this claims regression, but I can't find anything in the log: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1324/landing-080-vivid/excuses.html [19:58] two times in a row now [19:59] Wellark: I think it's still "in-progress" no? [19:59] Wait, that's armhf [20:00] i386 shows regression [20:00] qmluitests.sh FAIL timed out [20:01] oh.. === olli__ is now known as olli