| mwhudson | slangasek: those multiarch-- packages in docker have all gone upstream | 00:20 |
|---|---|---|
| slangasek | mwhudson: ah excellent | 00:27 |
| mwhudson | slangasek: also i think it is "multiarch" as in "multiple architecture support" not the debian thing :-) | 00:28 |
| mwhudson | slangasek: runc & containerd too? | 00:52 |
| mwhudson | slangasek: also the golang-defaults in yakkety NEW would be great... | 00:57 |
| === fabo_ is now known as fabo | ||
| === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 | ||
| Laney | Bah | 09:11 |
| apw | that good huh? | 09:12 |
| Laney | Please queue -Q unapproved -s xenial-proposed reject gst-plugins-bad1.0 gst-plugins-ugly1.0 | 09:12 |
| * Laney closed the wrong bug | 09:12 | |
| Laney | Probably need to include a message there, which can be "Laney sucks at closing bugs" | 09:13 |
| apw | Laney, what about the other two? | 09:15 |
| Laney | they seem to have the right bug | 09:15 |
| Laney | it should be 1594407 not 1575152 | 09:15 |
| Laney | I guess that I copied and pasted the last merge changelog and didn't update the bug ref | 09:16 |
| apw | ok cool | 09:16 |
| Laney | whoopsie | 09:16 |
| Laney | :) | 09:16 |
| Laney | thanks apw! | 09:16 |
| apw | Laney, double ugly ? | 10:17 |
| Laney | i've heard that one before | 10:18 |
| Laney | they seem to be identical | 10:18 |
| * apw will bounce the second one then | 10:19 | |
| === cpaelzer is now known as cpaelzer_lunch | ||
| === cpaelzer_lunch is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| === ara is now known as Guest21851 | ||
| === ochosi_ is now known as ochosi | ||
| === tyhicks` is now known as tyhicks | ||
| === attente_ is now known as attente | ||
| === georgelorch2 is now known as georgelorch | ||
| === bdrung_ is now known as bdrung | ||
| === ara is now known as Guest30555 | ||
| === slashd is now known as slashd|brb | ||
| === slashd|brb is now known as slashd | ||
| mwhudson | slangasek: can i get some more queued stuff released? runc from xenial UNAPPROVED, containerd from xenial NEW, golang-defaults from yakkety NEW | 21:09 |
| flexiondotorg | infinity, Is there a plan for who is driving 16.10 Alpha1? | 21:52 |
| flexiondotorg | infinity, Asking around Lubuntu and Ubuntu MATE are in. Kubuntu are out. Waiting on final confirmation from Xubuntu. Not heard from Ubuntu GNOME yet. | 21:59 |
| flexiondotorg | infinity, Xubuntu are out. | 22:10 |
| slangasek | mwhudson: remind me, was there an email thread somewhere documenting what we've signed off for an SRU plan for runc+containerd? | 22:25 |
| mwhudson | slangasek: there was a thread about that (which i misunderstood at first), who is it who gets to "sign off"? | 22:26 |
| slangasek | mwhudson: any member of the SRU team; I thought infinity had given sign-off but I want to double-check what he blessed to make sure I'm reviewing with the right glasses on | 22:26 |
| mwhudson | slangasek: yeah, just found an email from infinity about this, let me read it more carefully :) | 22:27 |
| mwhudson | slangasek: subject:"runc & containerd packaging (wrt new docker.io)" | 22:27 |
| slangasek | thx, hunting | 22:27 |
| mwhudson | slangasek: 28 may | 22:28 |
| slangasek | yep, got it | 22:28 |
| slangasek | "but with the same loose SRU policy for upstream version bumps" - ok, that's sufficiently clear :) | 22:29 |
| slangasek | -libcontainer/criurpc/criurpc.pb.go | 22:29 |
| slangasek | +#libcontainer/criurpc/criurpc.pb.go | 22:29 |
| slangasek | the irony of this being in a diff to a file named "clean" | 22:29 |
| mwhudson | heh yes | 22:30 |
| slangasek | mwhudson: do I read this correctly that the new version of runc is regressing vs. the current xenial version wrt bundling of dependencies? | 22:30 |
| mwhudson | slangasek: yes | 22:31 |
| mwhudson | the current xenial version came from debian, we didn't touch it at all | 22:31 |
| slangasek | ok, and this is actually consistent with the policy for docker.io also | 22:32 |
| mwhudson | there is a crazy situation where docker vendors bits of containerd and containerd vendors bits of docker, etc | 22:32 |
| mwhudson | slangasek: afk for a few | 22:33 |
| slangasek | mwhudson: runc has rev builddeps in xenial: golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient, gosu. Can you please include these in the test case on bug #1574904? | 22:38 |
| ubot5 | bug 1574904 in docker.io (Ubuntu Xenial) "Old clients cannot talk to Docker in 16.04" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1574904 | 22:38 |
| mwhudson | slangasek: done | 22:53 |
| === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 | ||
| mwhudson | slangasek: containerd? | 23:08 |
| === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 | ||
| slangasek | mwhudson: accepted | 23:33 |
| mwhudson | slangasek: thanks | 23:33 |
| mwhudson | slangasek: can you accept the binaries too? | 23:44 |
| slangasek | mwhudson: yes, getting there just now :) | 23:45 |
| mwhudson | slangasek: thanks :) | 23:45 |
| mwhudson | slangasek: and then golang-defaults in yakkety and i'll leave you alone for at least a day :) | 23:45 |
| slangasek | dear lintian, please stop telling me that 'writeN' is a misspelling of 'written' | 23:47 |
| nacc | heh | 23:47 |
| mwhudson | slangasek: lintian definitely has a sense of humour | 23:48 |
| slangasek | I: lintian: spelling-error-in-binary writeN rotten | 23:49 |
| mwhudson | slangasek: thanks | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!