[00:20] slangasek: those multiarch-- packages in docker have all gone upstream [00:27] mwhudson: ah excellent [00:28] slangasek: also i think it is "multiarch" as in "multiple architecture support" not the debian thing :-) [00:52] slangasek: runc & containerd too? [00:57] slangasek: also the golang-defaults in yakkety NEW would be great... === fabo_ is now known as fabo === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 [09:11] Bah [09:12] that good huh? [09:12] Please queue -Q unapproved -s xenial-proposed reject gst-plugins-bad1.0 gst-plugins-ugly1.0 [09:12] * Laney closed the wrong bug [09:13] Probably need to include a message there, which can be "Laney sucks at closing bugs" [09:15] Laney, what about the other two? [09:15] they seem to have the right bug [09:15] it should be 1594407 not 1575152 [09:16] I guess that I copied and pasted the last merge changelog and didn't update the bug ref [09:16] ok cool [09:16] whoopsie [09:16] :) [09:16] thanks apw! [10:17] Laney, double ugly ? [10:18] i've heard that one before [10:18] they seem to be identical [10:19] * apw will bounce the second one then === cpaelzer is now known as cpaelzer_lunch === cpaelzer_lunch is now known as cpaelzer === ara is now known as Guest21851 === ochosi_ is now known as ochosi === tyhicks` is now known as tyhicks === attente_ is now known as attente === georgelorch2 is now known as georgelorch === bdrung_ is now known as bdrung === ara is now known as Guest30555 === slashd is now known as slashd|brb === slashd|brb is now known as slashd [21:09] slangasek: can i get some more queued stuff released? runc from xenial UNAPPROVED, containerd from xenial NEW, golang-defaults from yakkety NEW [21:52] infinity, Is there a plan for who is driving 16.10 Alpha1? [21:59] infinity, Asking around Lubuntu and Ubuntu MATE are in. Kubuntu are out. Waiting on final confirmation from Xubuntu. Not heard from Ubuntu GNOME yet. [22:10] infinity, Xubuntu are out. [22:25] mwhudson: remind me, was there an email thread somewhere documenting what we've signed off for an SRU plan for runc+containerd? [22:26] slangasek: there was a thread about that (which i misunderstood at first), who is it who gets to "sign off"? [22:26] mwhudson: any member of the SRU team; I thought infinity had given sign-off but I want to double-check what he blessed to make sure I'm reviewing with the right glasses on [22:27] slangasek: yeah, just found an email from infinity about this, let me read it more carefully :) [22:27] slangasek: subject:"runc & containerd packaging (wrt new docker.io)" [22:27] thx, hunting [22:28] slangasek: 28 may [22:28] yep, got it [22:29] "but with the same loose SRU policy for upstream version bumps" - ok, that's sufficiently clear :) [22:29] -libcontainer/criurpc/criurpc.pb.go [22:29] +#libcontainer/criurpc/criurpc.pb.go [22:29] the irony of this being in a diff to a file named "clean" [22:30] heh yes [22:30] mwhudson: do I read this correctly that the new version of runc is regressing vs. the current xenial version wrt bundling of dependencies? [22:31] slangasek: yes [22:31] the current xenial version came from debian, we didn't touch it at all [22:32] ok, and this is actually consistent with the policy for docker.io also [22:32] there is a crazy situation where docker vendors bits of containerd and containerd vendors bits of docker, etc [22:33] slangasek: afk for a few [22:38] mwhudson: runc has rev builddeps in xenial: golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient, gosu. Can you please include these in the test case on bug #1574904? [22:38] bug 1574904 in docker.io (Ubuntu Xenial) "Old clients cannot talk to Docker in 16.04" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1574904 [22:53] slangasek: done === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 [23:08] slangasek: containerd? === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 [23:33] mwhudson: accepted [23:33] slangasek: thanks [23:44] slangasek: can you accept the binaries too? [23:45] mwhudson: yes, getting there just now :) [23:45] slangasek: thanks :) [23:45] slangasek: and then golang-defaults in yakkety and i'll leave you alone for at least a day :) [23:47] dear lintian, please stop telling me that 'writeN' is a misspelling of 'written' [23:47] heh [23:48] slangasek: lintian definitely has a sense of humour [23:49] I: lintian: spelling-error-in-binary writeN rotten [23:58] slangasek: thanks