[00:20] <mwhudson> slangasek: those multiarch-- packages in docker have all gone upstream
[00:27] <slangasek> mwhudson: ah excellent
[00:28] <mwhudson> slangasek: also i think it is "multiarch" as in "multiple architecture support" not the debian thing :-)
[00:52] <mwhudson> slangasek: runc & containerd too?
[00:57] <mwhudson> slangasek: also the golang-defaults in yakkety NEW would be great...
[09:11] <Laney> Bah
[09:12] <apw> that good huh?
[09:12] <Laney> Please queue -Q unapproved -s xenial-proposed reject gst-plugins-bad1.0 gst-plugins-ugly1.0
[09:12]  * Laney closed the wrong bug
[09:13] <Laney> Probably need to include a message there, which can be "Laney sucks at closing bugs"
[09:15] <apw> Laney, what about the other two?
[09:15] <Laney> they seem to have the right bug
[09:15] <Laney> it should be 1594407 not 1575152
[09:16] <Laney> I guess that I copied and pasted the last merge changelog and didn't update the bug ref
[09:16] <apw> ok cool
[09:16] <Laney> whoopsie
[09:16] <Laney> :)
[09:16] <Laney> thanks apw!
[10:17] <apw> Laney, double ugly ?
[10:18] <Laney> i've heard that one before
[10:18] <Laney> they seem to be identical
[10:19]  * apw will bounce the second one then
[21:09] <mwhudson> slangasek: can i get some more queued stuff released? runc from xenial UNAPPROVED, containerd from xenial NEW, golang-defaults from yakkety NEW
[21:52] <flexiondotorg> infinity, Is there a plan for who is driving 16.10 Alpha1?
[21:59] <flexiondotorg> infinity, Asking around Lubuntu and Ubuntu MATE are in. Kubuntu are out. Waiting on final confirmation from Xubuntu. Not heard from Ubuntu GNOME yet.
[22:10] <flexiondotorg> infinity, Xubuntu are out.
[22:25] <slangasek> mwhudson: remind me, was there an email thread somewhere documenting what we've signed off for an SRU plan for runc+containerd?
[22:26] <mwhudson> slangasek: there was a thread about that (which i misunderstood at first), who is it who gets to "sign off"?
[22:26] <slangasek> mwhudson: any member of the SRU team; I thought infinity had given sign-off but I want to double-check what he blessed to make sure I'm reviewing with the right glasses on
[22:27] <mwhudson> slangasek: yeah, just found an email from infinity about this, let me read it more carefully :)
[22:27] <mwhudson> slangasek: subject:"runc & containerd packaging (wrt new docker.io)"
[22:27] <slangasek> thx, hunting
[22:28] <mwhudson> slangasek: 28 may
[22:28] <slangasek> yep, got it
[22:29] <slangasek> "but with the same loose SRU policy for upstream version bumps" - ok, that's sufficiently clear :)
[22:29] <slangasek> -libcontainer/criurpc/criurpc.pb.go
[22:29] <slangasek> +#libcontainer/criurpc/criurpc.pb.go
[22:29] <slangasek> the irony of this being in a diff to a file named "clean"
[22:30] <mwhudson> heh yes
[22:30] <slangasek> mwhudson: do I read this correctly that the new version of runc is regressing vs. the current xenial version wrt bundling of dependencies?
[22:31] <mwhudson> slangasek: yes
[22:31] <mwhudson> the current xenial version came from debian, we didn't touch it at all
[22:32] <slangasek> ok, and this is actually consistent with the policy for docker.io also
[22:32] <mwhudson> there is a crazy situation where docker vendors bits of containerd and containerd vendors bits of docker, etc
[22:33] <mwhudson> slangasek: afk for a few
[22:38] <slangasek> mwhudson: runc has rev builddeps in xenial: golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient, gosu.  Can you please include these in the test case on bug #1574904?
[22:53] <mwhudson> slangasek: done
[23:08] <mwhudson> slangasek: containerd?
[23:33] <slangasek> mwhudson: accepted
[23:33] <mwhudson> slangasek: thanks
[23:44] <mwhudson> slangasek: can you accept the binaries too?
[23:45] <slangasek> mwhudson: yes, getting there just now :)
[23:45] <mwhudson> slangasek: thanks :)
[23:45] <mwhudson> slangasek: and then golang-defaults in yakkety and i'll leave you alone for at least a day :)
[23:47] <slangasek> dear lintian, please stop telling me that 'writeN' is a misspelling of 'written'
[23:47] <nacc> heh
[23:48] <mwhudson> slangasek: lintian definitely has a sense of humour
[23:49] <slangasek> I: lintian: spelling-error-in-binary writeN rotten
[23:58] <mwhudson> slangasek: thanks