=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === tsdgeos_ is now known as tsdgeos [08:50] rvr: yo man [09:40] jin_: pong [09:45] rvr: hi, are you Victor Ruiz... am I right? buddy [09:45] jin_: Yes :) [09:45] rvr: nice! [09:45] thanks you [09:45] thanks [09:45] i saw your mail yesterday [09:46] wanna discuss with you about the frieza [09:46] now we have the problem on testing it [09:46] so please don't do anything from your side [09:46] jin_: Which problem? [09:46] if it is verified pass from us, I will let you know and approve the lander field of the ticket [09:47] rvr: libertine-scope/puritine [09:47] the XApps could not show on the scope [09:47] jin_: Oh [09:47] only in frieza, I am checking this with Chris [09:47] I see [09:47] and I already let sil2100 and jibel know this problem as well [09:48] so please do not spend effort on frieza at the moment [09:48] if it is verified, I will let you know [09:48] Ack [09:48] (i mean verified pass from our local) [09:48] rvr: nice, thanks [13:50] jgdx: Silo 41 approved [13:51] rvr, thx! [14:41] kenvandine, hey, can you binNEW biometryd? [14:41] Saviq, i'm not an archive admin [14:41] seb128, ^^ please? [14:41] right [14:42] did that land? [14:42] seb128, https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/silo/41 [14:43] Saviq, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/yakkety/+queue ? it's sourceNEW not binNEW, right? [14:43] seb128, right, sry [14:43] Saviq, kenvandine; done [14:44] thanks [14:46] seb128, thanks [14:47] yw! === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [18:36] trainguards, could you take a look on silo 73, some packages did not build on ppa: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1037 [18:36] there is no build log [18:43] renatu: I see some that are waiting? [18:44] tedg, I push a new build [18:45] tedg, the last one failed without any log: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-073/+build/10160384 [18:51] That's weird, but it seems like at least amd64 is built now. [18:51] renatu: I don't have a good answer there, sorry. We could rebuild them, but it seem you've done that already. [18:52] rvr: hi, I am checking silo 42, the title problems Rae mentioned need to be reported/fixed in the SDK itself, we use standard headers in the places pointed [18:52] rvr: as for the timestamp label on message bubbles, I will fix it