[05:00] <hikiko> Hi
[06:14] <pitti> Good morning
[06:22] <didrocks> hey pitti
[06:31] <pitti> bonjour didrocks !
[08:01] <Laney> hey!
[08:05] <Laney> BE LIKE THAT!
[08:05] <pitti> hey Laney !
[08:05] <Laney> oh!
[08:05] <Laney> hi pitti
[08:05] <Laney> how's it going?
[08:06] <pitti> Laney, chrisccoulson: happy "Do I stay or do I go now? ♩ ♪" day!
[08:06] <pitti> Laney: really well, thanks
[08:06] <Laney> haha
[08:06] <Laney> I already voted
[08:07] <didrocks> good morning Laney
[08:08] <Laney> SCARY
[08:08] <Laney> hey didrocks
[08:09] <Laney> how are youuuuuuuuuu
[08:11] <didrocks> I'm good, thanks! Yourself?
[08:13] <Laney> weird
[08:13] <Laney> today's ze day
[08:15] <Trevinho> morning
[08:15] <Trevinho> Laney: you saved your our union?
[08:16] <Trevinho> :)
[08:19] <andyrock> morning all
[08:21] <ricotz> Laney, hoping the best
[08:21] <ricotz> hey desktopers
[08:23] <Laney> Trevinho: I did my bit :P
[08:23] <Laney> hi Trevinho andyrock ricotz
[08:23] <Laney> europe wakes up late!
[08:24]  * ricotz already did some morning sports
[08:38] <muktupavels> Trevinho: why status still shows only 'successfully built' - https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1580?
[09:14] <chrisccoulson> hi pitti :)
[09:14] <chrisccoulson> I do hope we stay ;)
[11:40] <Laney> bah
[11:40] <Laney> I don't get this glib2.0 ftbfs
[12:24] <seb128> good morning desktopers
[12:24] <willcooke> o/
[12:41] <pitti> salut seb128 ! as-tu eu un bon voyage ?
[12:42] <seb128> lut pitti, oui très bien
[12:42] <pitti> seb128: qu'est-ce que tu a fait avec willcooke ? :-)
[12:42] <seb128> empty seats next to me, direct flight, 7h
[12:42] <pitti> sounds about as good as it can get
[12:42] <seb128> yeah
[12:43] <seb128> on est dans une réunion sur snappy avec willcooke, mais son wifi ne marche pas bien
[12:52] <desrt> hihi
[12:52] <didrocks> hey desrt!
[12:53] <didrocks> salut seb128
[12:53] <seb128> hey desrt
[12:53] <seb128> lut didrocks
[12:53]  * desrt spots the french sneaking in
[12:54] <desrt> how is boston, seb?
[12:55] <seb128> very nice
[12:55] <seb128> I haven't be there for a while, still like the city ;-)
[12:56] <seb128> went for some exercice in Boston Common yesterday that was great
[13:02] <Laney> hmmmm
[13:02] <Laney> hey seb128
[13:02] <Laney> are you fully snapped?
[13:02] <seb128> hey Laney, how is it going?
[13:02] <seb128> not yet!
[13:02] <seb128> did you vote?
[13:02] <Laney> yep
[13:03] <Laney> did it before work
[13:04] <Laney> I couldn't help but stereotype everyone that I saw near the polling place, trying to guess how they voted
[13:04] <Laney> DIVIDED BRITAIN
[13:08] <seb128> hehe
[13:08] <seb128> when are we going to start getting votes estimates?
[13:09] <Laney> some time after 10pm
[13:10] <Laney> I guess you'll get a good idea around 4-5am
[13:10] <Laney> which is probably alright for you
[13:10] <Laney> http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/23/referendum-night-when-to-nap-and-the-results-to-watch
[13:11] <seb128> thanks
[13:12] <Laney> desrt: raaargh
[13:12] <Laney> he;lp me
[13:13] <Laney> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/2.49.2-1
[13:13] <Laney> https://paste.debian.net/748001
[13:14] <Laney> something is going wrong in g_object_set but I cannae see it
[13:14] <pitti> ok, so I'll definitively wait for tmw morning to check the news, and put the mobile next to my bed :)
[13:14] <Laney> iterating the va_list doesn't terminate properly, but the input is NULL terminated
[13:14] <Laney> confuse
[13:15] <Laney> pitti: probably around the time you'll get up anyway :)
[13:38] <Laney> seb128: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/gallery/2016/jun/23/quirky-referendum-polling-stations-in-pictures
[13:40] <pitti> Laney: haha, that's great
[13:41] <Laney> I like the one in someone's front room
[13:41] <pitti> yeah, very cozy
[13:45] <seb128> andyrock, hey, I just saw your comment on the bug about the dash not listing new software ... what's the status of the gnome-menus patch? is that waiting for desrt to do a new review round?
[13:45] <seb128> Laney, fun
[13:45] <andyrock> seb128: yep. waiting for review
[13:45] <seb128> I though that polling station would be more "official"
[13:46] <andyrock> ^
[13:46] <andyrock> ?
[13:46] <seb128> andyrock, did you reping desrt? she probably didn't notice the new patch on the bug
[13:46] <andyrock> seb128: maybe would be better to propose the patch using a branch but cannot find gnome-menus on launchpad
[13:46] <andyrock> mmm yeah i pinged her
[13:46] <andyrock> maybe she forgot :D
[13:47] <andyrock> there is also the gtk branch for the menu shadows
[13:47] <seb128> it's an upstream patch, would perhaps work better with a git branch
[13:47] <seb128> or a bugzilla
[13:47] <seb128> oh, right
[13:47] <seb128> did Trevinho or desrt review that one?
[13:47] <seb128> maybe Laney can help to get it uploaded
[13:47] <seb128> otherwise I can have a look next week
[13:48] <seb128> I'm in Boston today/tomorrow and I don't think I'm going to find slot for that one
[13:48] <andyrock> i don't like that patch enough to propose it upstream
[13:48] <andyrock> it's a timeout fix :D
[13:48] <andyrock> :D
[13:49] <andyrock> but it's good enough to workaround the problem in unity
[13:49] <andyrock> seb128: and Trevinho already reviewed the gtk patch
[13:49] <andyrock> in Prague
[13:49] <seb128> k
[13:49] <seb128> well, the gnome-menus issue is a bug upstream no?
[13:50] <seb128> can we get a fix that is good enough to be upstreamed? ;-)
[13:52] <seb128> andyrock, any, let's see if we can get it reviewed for ubuntu as well
[13:53] <seb128> desrt, could you review https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1506744/comments/47 ?
[13:53] <seb128> next iteration from the one you already reviewed
[14:32] <desrt> zomg
[14:38] <desrt> andyrock: reviewed
[14:38] <desrt> the patch is weird, but no obvious problems
[14:39] <desrt> ie: now that the patch shrunk in size, it's clear that it could shrink even more
[14:41] <desrt> i feel a bit silly for not having seen that before
[14:41] <desrt> please let me know what you think
[14:46] <andyrock> desrt: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1506744/comments/52 regarding this not sure
[14:47] <andyrock> it has been while i need to look again on it
[14:47] <desrt> in any case, i sense that you are probably sick of working on this by now, so just go with what you have
[14:47] <desrt> but if you want to kick it around a bit more, then feel free
[14:47] <andyrock> I'm working on other stuff right now I can allocate some time next week
[14:48] <andyrock> or we can just send it
[14:48] <seb128> andyrock, desrt, I'm going to upload to yakkety to get things moving, so the unity fix can be in the next landing
[14:48] <seb128> then we can look at SRU
[14:48] <andyrock> yep
[15:05] <seb128> andyrock, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-menus/3.13.3-6ubuntu4
[15:06] <andyrock> seb128, desrt thanks :)
[15:06] <seb128> thank you for doing the work!
[15:22] <Laney> desrt: https://paste.debian.net/748401 ?
[15:41] <desrt> fascinating
[15:42] <desrt> the g_object_set() call obviously needs this, but i'm concerned about the comparison
[15:42] <desrt> was that truly required?
[15:43] <Laney> i'm guessing it's only the g_object_set that needs it
[15:43] <desrt> can you scale back the patch?
[15:43] <desrt> you could also write _set(obj, "foo", (guint64) 12345);
[15:43] <desrt> which i find to be nicer to look at :)
[15:43]  * desrt is not super impressed with those macros
[15:44] <Laney> I thought it might be preferred to uint64ify all of the things
[15:44] <Laney> but whatevs
[15:44] <Laney> ta
[15:44] <desrt> i'd prefer if the tests were written in a way that made them more likely to fail :)
[15:44] <desrt> i'm going to directly commit the (guint64) cast upstream
[15:47] <Laney> k
[15:47] <Laney> I would have pushed it after test building
[15:47] <Laney> merci
[15:50] <desrt> i'm running the test now just to make sure :p
[15:51] <Laney> on i386 i hope
[15:51] <Laney> :)
[15:51] <desrt> *cough*
[15:51] <desrt> still working on my plan to set up a massive builtfarm of exotic hardware :)
[15:52] <Laney> that's why we have debian experimental
[15:52] <desrt> "for when unstable is just not unstable enough"
[15:52] <Laney> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=glib2.0&suite=experimental
[15:52] <desrt> the regression got introduced when the accessors for u/int64 were introduced
[15:52] <desrt> which is why it worked for so long
[15:52] <Laney> ya
[15:53] <desrt> people not doing builds anymore on i386 is becoming a bit of an issue...
[15:53] <desrt> pushed the small fix.
[15:57] <Laney> uploaded to debian
[15:59] <seb128> Laney, pitti, could one of you retry the libimobiledevice autopkgtest that failed in the xenial sru?
[16:01] <Laney> seb128: does http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/xenial/update_excuses.html#libimobiledevice work?
[16:01] <seb128> Laney, I guess it does, but I forgot my ubikey home
[16:01] <seb128> doh
[16:02] <seb128> can't go through the 2fa
[16:02] <Laney> ok, I'll click it, but that means you can ping anyone not just the two of us
[16:02] <seb128> I never know what acls are required
[16:02] <Laney> done
[16:02] <seb128> is that upload right for the concerned package?
[16:02] <seb128> thanks
[16:02] <Laney> yes
[16:02] <seb128> makes sense
[16:02] <seb128> sorry for the direct ping!
[16:03] <Laney> or the triggering package
[16:04] <seb128> flexiondotorg, hey, did you see the comment on bug #1574789?
[16:05] <seb128> that SRU is in the queue for a while and verification-failed
[16:05] <Laney> wtf
[16:05] <Laney> I just got a suspicious dialog on my desktop
[16:06] <seb128> "you should vote brexit"
[16:06] <seb128> they hacked your computer!
[16:06] <Laney> see telegram
[16:06] <Laney> !!!
[16:06] <flexiondotorg> seb128, Thanks. I'll follow up on that. Should I re-upload with the same version number?
[16:07] <seb128> flexiondotorg, no,ýou can't and users wouldn't get it/it would confuse apt, need to bump the revision
[16:07] <flexiondotorg> seb128, I ask because that version has never been publish in the archive.
[16:07] <seb128> Laney, can you xprop it?
[16:08] <seb128> flexiondotorg, it did in proposed no? or what is verification-failed?
[16:08] <flexiondotorg> seb128, OK. Understood.
[16:09] <flexiondotorg> I'll re-upload in the next day or so.
[16:09] <seb128> thanks
[16:28] <ogra_> https://twitter.com/launchpadstatus seems quite outdated
[16:28]  * flexiondotorg goes to the polling station.
[16:29] <ogra_> ahh ... it was a subtle hint from LP for all the brits ... now i get it
[17:07] <Laney> niiiiiiiiiiiiight
[17:09] <seb128> night Laney
[17:23] <seb128> happyaron, hey (you probably called it a day but it's for tomorrow then), did you look at the n-m/nm-a e.u.c potential regressions issues?
[17:57] <jbicha> seb128: it looks like your X and Y evolution-indicator uploads missed updating debian/control for the change
[17:57] <seb128> jbicha, thanks, wonder what happened there
[17:59] <jbicha> I was working on the empathy update, we should set X-Ubuntu-Use-Langpack: yes there too, right?
[18:03] <seb128> I guess
[18:03] <jbicha> I don't know how the langpacks work to now whether that's helpful or not
[18:05] <seb128> if that flag is set the translations are removed from the binary and included in the langpacks instead
[18:05] <seb128> unsure how useful it is for empathy
[18:05] <seb128> do we have distro specific strings added by patches?
[18:30] <jbicha> seb128: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/empathy/ubuntu/view/head:/debian/patches/43_quicklists.patch
[18:32] <cyphermox> seb128: pitti: think it's fine to unblock aptdaemon/packagekit by now?
[18:32] <seb128> cyphermox, I don't know of any blocker so +1 from my side
[18:35] <jbicha> seb128: 2 of those actions should be upstreamable
[18:35] <jbicha> the last shows up (in G Shell for instance) but doesn't do anything if unity-control-center isn't installed
[18:35] <seb128> jbicha, sorry I timeoutdated, what actions?
[18:36] <jbicha> https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/empathy/ubuntu/view/head:/debian/patches/43_quicklists.patch
[18:37] <seb128> so yeah better to use langpacks
[18:39] <jbicha> ok, thanks
[19:12] <pitti> cyphermox: I defer to seb128's judgement, I'm not up to speed with packagekit; so it seems fine
[19:33] <cyphermox> ok, then I suppose let's open the gates
[19:35] <seb128> who use y anyaway *g*
[19:35] <seb128> anyway
[19:35] <cyphermox> well, I do
[19:35] <cyphermox> but all my stuff I've tested ;)
[19:35]  * seb128 wave is LTS is great flag
[19:38] <cyphermox> removed the block tag; let's watch this carefully
[19:39] <seb128> thanks