/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/06/23/#ubuntu-kernel.txt

=== ayan_ is now known as ayan
sam_yanIs there some project or work to tuning the multi-core?01:51
apwsantoshmahto, 07:42
apwbah sorry tab fail07:42
sam_yan?09:05
apwsam_yan, there is cirtianly wrk going on upstream on numa and multi-core and the relationship between09:25
apwwhich trusty kernel, GA or one of the HWE kernels ?16:28
fish_the trusty-updates installer kernel is 3.13.0-85-generic16:28
apwok so the GA kernel16:28
fish_so that's what I would need the module for but I'm also fine with using another kernel which has this module available.16:28
* apw looks16:29
fish_http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=pm80xx.ko&mode=exactfilename&suite=trusty-updates&arch=any16:29
fish_the only 3.13.0-85 is /lib/modules/3.13.0-85-powerpc-e500/kernel/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx.ko16:29
fish_but maybe the kernel module is called diffrently now16:29
apwwell its unlikely to be a differnt name in the two architectures16:29
fish_it's unlikely that a raid controller driver is available for ppc but not amd64 I'd say ;)16:29
fish_so.. who knows16:29
apwindeed16:29
apwthat driver looks to be enabled for all architectures16:30
apwthat have pci and scsi16:30
apwdebian.master/abi/3.13.0-87.133/amd64/generic.modules:pm80xx16:30
apwand the module is a module for amd6416:30
apwcrap launchpad is in a heap16:31
apwso i can't get the packages to confirm16:31
fish_it's possible that the module was introduced around that time. I'm pretty sure we had to use a external/dkms kernel modul in the past16:33
apwdunno but it looks to be in the version you are asking about16:35
apwbut i cannotdownload actual binaries right now to confirm16:35
apw(this is from the info in the source tree)16:35
fish_apw: hrm.. let see, maybe packages.ubuntu.com is just wrong17:00
fish_apw: nope: dpkg -L linux-image-3.13.0-85-generic|grep pm80xx17:01
apwhave you looked in linux-image-extra-...17:01
fish_ah right, let me check17:01
fish_apw: oh! yes, it's there.. 17:03
fish_apw: but why is it missing from packages.ubuntu.com?17:04
fish_apw: okay now maybe there is also a better way to include that in the installer than me extracting the initrd manually and adding the module..?17:06
apwfish_, you are looking at linux-image on p.u.c perhaps17:06
fish_apw: no, I searched for all packages including pm80xx.ko17:07
apwfish_, sounds like that should be in the disk udeb, and to fix that weneed a bug17:07
apwfile a bug against the kernel "ubuntu-bug linux" and put that detail in there17:07
fish_okay, then I'll fill a bug17:07
apwwhen you have a bug, let me know the number here17:07
fish_kk17:07
apwbut ... that won't fix existing installer images17:07
apwso if we fix it "now" we should be able to fix it in the next point release though17:08
fish_apw: are there something like nightlies for the installer?17:08
apwthere will be soon if not, as we are coming up to a a release17:08
fish_launchpad has still issues though17:10
apwyep a lot of infrastucture is sick right now, many people are running about17:11
fish_apw: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/159562817:16
ubot5Launchpad bug 1595628 in linux (Ubuntu) "disk udeb should include pm80xx" [Undecided,New]17:16
apwkamal, ^ that one we prolly want to ensure is fixed in trusty and xenial kernels this cycle17:18
apw(so you might want to poke me if you haven't had a patch for that before you close up the releases)17:18
kamalapw, last day for commits will be tomorrow, so . . .  poke!17:21
fish_apw: a minor note: the brad-figg bot says "please add a comment stating that fact and change the bug status to 'Confirmed'." where the status description of confirmed says "Verified by someone other than the reporter.17:40
apwfish_, yeah don't worry about that, just move it confirmed17:40
fish_I've set it to confirmed but this could confuse people and might (or might not) be trivial to fix :)17:40
apwfish_, the people who consume the bug states know that they are a little odd for kernel bugs17:42
apwfish_, we will not be confused by it being confirmed17:43
fish_apw: fine with me, but from a UI perspective you tell your users two things that are contradictory. I know that you added this bot and what it says weights more than the those labels, others might not. just a though :)17:44
fish_anyway, thanks a lot for your help :)17:45
apwfish_, meh very few people read anything even if it is flashing17:45
fish_fair enough :)17:45
apwfish_, confirmed is mean to mean this is affecting more than one user, but we cheat a little17:45
apwelse we keep spamming you for logs :)17:45
apwthere you go i have moved it to triaged, as it has everything we need to fix it17:46
apwnow it is in a state which matches the meaning17:46
fish_yay :)17:46
=== JanC is now known as Guest91547
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
apwstgraber, hey ... when are we going to get the lxc tests fixed in yakkety ... i am concerned about the level of change we are about to dump in there when lxc is totally untested19:34
stgraberapw: uploading a new lxc which should skip the test on yakkety19:42
stgraberhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/17763572/19:43
apwstgraber, awsome thanks19:46
stgraberwell, skipping the test isn't exactly awesome, but yeah, it's going to be less crappy for you19:47
apwstgraber, well if it doesn't work and always fails, that is worse than skipping19:47
apwstgraber, as we just assume the failure is that test and ignore the results, and who knows what else is actually broken19:48
stgraberyeah, I actually do read the adt test output usually to confirm it's just that test :)19:48
=== mwhudson is now known as mwhudson__

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!