jbicha | Please consider ignoring autopkgtest failures for vagrant: https://bugs.debian.org/828706 | 01:22 |
---|---|---|
ubottu | Debian bug 828706 in src:vagrant "vagrant: autopkgtest fails if dependency has newer upstream version" [Normal,Open] | 01:22 |
=== ezri is now known as dax | ||
cpaelzer | good morning | 05:28 |
pitti | Good morning | 05:53 |
pitti | slangasek: it is now; I guess still bug 1588566 | 05:54 |
ubottu | bug 1588566 in Auto Package Testing "autopkgtest results go missing for a long time after the test completes" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1588566 | 05:54 |
pitti | slangasek: although the runs take much shorter than the 1.5 hours now after the fs reorg, they still take way too long in some cases, not sure why | 05:54 |
pitti | i. e. this bug is still valid | 05:55 |
pitti | xnox, infinity: aupkg01 (10.100.0.12) is AWOL again, help please? | 06:04 |
pitti | jbicha: retrying gmp-ecm/armhf won't bring much: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/gmp-ecm/yakkety/armhf/ | 06:04 |
pitti | jbicha: 7.0 is really broken on armhf | 06:05 |
pitti | (and it takes effing long too, so please don't retry too often) | 06:05 |
jbicha | pitti: sorry, I was just clicking buttons :( | 06:07 |
pitti | jbicha: no worries, just mentioning that this is really broken | 06:08 |
pitti | if it holds up stuff, we need to override | 06:08 |
pitti | but this looks like a genuine regression on 32 bit, so it should get at least a bug report | 06:09 |
pitti | jbicha: welcome back, by the way! how are you? | 06:09 |
jbicha | pitti: I'm doing pretty good, thanks :) | 06:10 |
pitti | cjwatson, wgrant: we didn't get an export yesterday on https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+language-packs; can you please kick the cron job manually? | 06:57 |
=== spineau is now known as spineau_afk | ||
smb | Morning, I think someone needs to upload the signed grub2 updates to Trusty (proposed) still. Getting removal hints again | 07:13 |
pitti | jbicha: FYI, I filed debian bug 828717 about this | 07:52 |
ubottu | Debian bug 828717 in gmp-ecm "gmp-ecm: 7.0 regresses on 32 bit platforms" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/828717 | 07:52 |
=== athairus is now known as afkthairus | ||
doko | cjwatson, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gmp-gcc4/2:6.1.0+dfsg-2ubuntu4 causes gcc-4.7 to fail to build, because libmpc-dev and libmpfr-dev become uninstallable (depending on libgmp-dev). But I assume restoring the provides isn't an option either | 08:51 |
doko | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/268126150/buildlog_ubuntu-xenial-amd64.gcc-4.7_4.7.4-3ubuntu12_BUILDING.txt.gz | 08:52 |
rbasak | teward: thanks | 08:57 |
=== spineau_afk is now known as spineau | ||
cjwatson | doko: I don't think restoring the Provides is a good option, no. The sensible choices seem to be either making libmpc-dev and libmpfr-dev depend on libgmp-dev | libgmpv4-dev, or creating v4 versions of those two packages; I don't know which is better | 09:43 |
cjwatson | pitti: I can ask for it, but I'd prefer to wait until the vivid export that's due to start in 45 minutes has finished (which will take a few hours). | 09:46 |
pitti | cjwatson: hm, ok (the vivid one is not particularly urgent, but we need the xenial one for 16.04.1) | 09:47 |
pitti | but I guess building them tomorrow should be fine | 09:47 |
cjwatson | pitti: It could probably be ready by last thing today? | 09:48 |
pitti | cjwatson: right; if it is, I'll start the build tonight and do the testing/upload tomorrow | 09:49 |
xnox | infinity, sorry =) | 09:52 |
=== hikiko is now known as hikiko|afk | ||
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
xnox | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html seems to be last generated during EU referendum, and hasn't been since? | 10:49 |
xnox | pitti, could you please take a look as to why it is stuck? (if you have access to it) | 10:50 |
pitti | xnox: I don't -- I only have ssh, and have no privs to use the console method (remember, we tried a few weeks ago) | 10:51 |
pitti | xnox: I enabled crashdump on these machines, maybe there is one now | 10:51 |
xnox | pitti, i'm not talking about s390x =) | 10:51 |
pitti | xnox: oh sorry, I interpreted that as a pong to the above "aupkg01 is broken", sorry | 10:52 |
xnox | pitti, i'm talking about pending-sru generated by sru-report being stuck =0, should be on the same machine as the rest of the archive reports? =) | 10:52 |
pitti | xnox: yep, looking | 10:52 |
cjwatson | xnox: I've killed the current stuck run. | 10:52 |
cjwatson | pitti: ^- | 10:52 |
pitti | ah, thansk | 10:53 |
cjwatson | Probably got stuck during the GS2 power outage. | 10:53 |
=== salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
cpaelzer | is it "normal" that once I added a remote bug tracker like from ntp in this case bug 1567540 - I "loose" the ability to nominate for Series? | 11:38 |
ubottu | bug 1567540 in ntp (Ubuntu) "ntpd crashed with SIGABRT (was: ntp crashes everytime the network goes up or down.)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1567540 | 11:38 |
cpaelzer | if so why - and will that state be back to being able to nominate once it fetched the remote status? | 11:39 |
rbasak | cpaelzer: swap debian for ubuntu in the URL. | 11:54 |
rbasak | cpaelzer: it's a Launchpad UI issue. | 11:54 |
cpaelzer | rbasak: thanks ... but ... I see no debian in my URL | 11:55 |
cpaelzer | rbasak: the remote bug tracker is to ntp and the "browser" utl is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/1567540 | 11:56 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1567540 in ntp (Ubuntu) "ntpd crashed with SIGABRT (was: ntp crashes everytime the network goes up or down.)" [High,Triaged] | 11:56 |
cpaelzer | rbasak: where do I need to change it? | 11:56 |
rbasak | Oh, sorry. | 11:56 |
rbasak | Try: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1567540 | 11:56 |
rbasak | Basically the URL you follow has to be part of the Ubuntu project for you to see the Nominate stuff. Note that the bar that is yellow changes. | 11:57 |
cpaelzer | rbasak: dirty dark secrets - that did it - thanks | 11:57 |
xnox | .. | 11:57 |
xnox | how does one launch lxc armhf container on amd64? | 11:57 |
xnox | using lxd2.0 | 11:57 |
rbasak | tjaalton: any objection to syncing cobbler in bug 1593434? You TIL. | 11:57 |
ubottu | bug 1593434 in cobbler (Ubuntu) "Sync cobbler 2.6.6+dfsg1-12 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1593434 | 11:57 |
=== hikiko|afk is now known as hikiko | ||
tjaalton | rbasak: nope | 13:13 |
rbasak | tjaalton: great, thanks. | 13:25 |
pitti | tyhicks: hey, how are you? | 13:57 |
pitti | tyhicks: I just saw https://tracker.debian.org/news/777985 -- most of Debian's changes towards our package sound sensible for us too, so merging should hopefully have a very small delta now? | 13:58 |
* pitti is particularly interested in providing a native systemd units, as rcS init.d scripts are still problematic and we have a large patch for that downstream | 13:58 | |
tyhicks | pitti: hi - doing pretty well | 14:07 |
tyhicks | pitti: those do sound like reasonable changes - we'll have a look at syncing | 14:09 |
tyhicks | pitti: we work with intrigeri quite a bit in #apparmor so I'll ask him if I see anything odd | 14:10 |
=== olli__ is now known as olli | ||
pitti | tyhicks: oh, nice | 14:10 |
bdmurray | tjaalton: Could you look at fixing bug 1500751 in Trusty? | 14:53 |
ubottu | bug 1500751 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) "Cryptsetup Keyboard not working on Xubuntu 3.19.0-30" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1500751 | 14:53 |
=== willcooke_ is now known as willcooke | ||
tjaalton | apw: ^ can you cherry-pick that for trusty too? | 15:04 |
apw | tjaalton, likely :) | 15:04 |
tjaalton | good :) | 15:04 |
nacc | Logan: thanks! jbicha created a tag ('php7') for all those kind of bugs, I'll check on it | 15:35 |
smb | tjaalton, though you did not ask whether apw *will* do so :-P | 15:45 |
apw | smb, don't give away my trade secrets | 15:46 |
smb | apw, oops ... sorry | 15:46 |
nacc | mwhudson_: re: LP: #1569609, any ideas of how to make it get some more traction? was just reviewing LP: #1596578 and I don't think I can easily (without learning all about PHP internals) backport the change needed. | 16:54 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1569609 in php7.0 (Ubuntu Xenial) "[SRU] microrelease exception for src:php7.0" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1569609 | 16:54 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1596578 in php7.0 (Ubuntu) "zabbix issues with current php version" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1596578 | 16:54 |
nacc | rbasak: re: LP: #1593434, would it make sense to SRU or (possibly instead -backport) it to 16.04? AIUI, due to at least LP: #1570891, the version in 16.04 doesn't currently work. I'm an upstream developer for cobbler, and I'd much rather see 16.04 have a more current release. | 18:34 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1593434 in cobbler (Ubuntu) "Sync cobbler 2.6.6+dfsg1-12 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1593434 | 18:34 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1570891 in cobbler (Ubuntu) "cobbler uses old cobblerd URL resulting in URLError" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1570891 | 18:34 |
jbicha | nacc: "upgrade of Cobbler from 2.4.1 -> 2.6.x is not supported upstream" | 18:36 |
jbicha | how bad is that going to be for those already using cobbler in Ubuntu? | 18:37 |
nacc | jbicha: i'm going to figure that out now :) | 18:39 |
nacc | jbicha: i've never deployed 2.4.x | 18:39 |
nacc | jbicha: and no one using cobbler these days (that i've dealt with) has either :/ | 18:39 |
nacc | jbicha: i would argue this is similar to php5 -> php7, and other major transitions (albeit in a universe package), where we really can't migrate the configuration | 18:39 |
jbicha | I haven't used cobbler at all, but I'm thinking from an sru, it might be nice to know what happens from 14.04 LTS to 16.04 LTS | 18:40 |
nacc | agreed, i wouldn't suggest it formally until i figured that out | 18:40 |
nacc | jbicha: hence why i also wondered if -backports made some sense, since there might not be an upgrade path and backports is op-tin | 18:40 |
jbicha | oh, the upgrade from 14.04 to 16.04 needs manual work for php? | 18:41 |
nacc | jbicha: if you have local configuration, i believe it doesn't apply, possibly (variables got renamed, etc) | 18:42 |
jbicha | well since it's also "server" related I guess that's good precedence, if it's at least release noted | 18:42 |
nacc | jbicha: the language itself is BC, but i think the configuration has moved around, etc. | 18:42 |
=== mnepton is now known as mneptok | ||
nacc | well, mostly BC :) | 18:45 |
nacc | jbicha: yeah, i plan on adding a cobbler blurb yakkety release notes | 18:46 |
nacc | Logan: ok, there are definitely issues with zabbix, but i got them all fixed andwill file an SRU now | 19:44 |
nacc | i was able to successfully deply the version in xenial in a container and bring up the web ui | 19:44 |
rbasak | nacc: backports> yes, definitely. SRU> if it's completely broken in Xenial. Otherwise depends on severity I guess. | 19:50 |
rbasak | nacc: the amount of effort required to do it right may be too much though. I guess you'll find out. | 19:51 |
pitti | wgrant: I seem to have lost the combobox on https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+language-packs for marking a new full export as base for future diffs | 19:56 |
=== afkthairus is now known as athairus | ||
nacc | rbasak: ack, thanks! | 20:13 |
mwhudson_ | nacc: er did you really mean to ping me about that? | 21:13 |
=== mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson | ||
=== salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
=== nobuto_ is now known as nobuto | ||
nacc | mwhudson: you touched it last, in terms of the bug, if you had any ideas, i'd appreciate it; probably not directly yours to figure out though | 22:09 |
mwhudson | nacc: oh heh | 22:10 |
mwhudson | nacc: my understading is that it still requires someone on the SRU team to decide | 22:10 |
nacc | mwhudson: ack, that's my understanding too; and given it's a larger request, I imagine it will take time. I'm just a bit worried because I'm not sure how to SRU more involved fixes at this point, given our code-base. | 22:11 |
mwhudson | nacc: uploading something is probably a good way to encourage that to happen though | 22:11 |
mwhudson | nacc: do you have/can you make a package for me to sponsor? | 22:11 |
nacc | mwhudson: yeah, i can do that shortly, give me a little bit (i'll update the bug) | 22:11 |
mwhudson | nacc: cool | 22:11 |
nacc | mwhudson: thanks for that reminder :) | 22:11 |
* mwhudson subscribes to the bug, oops | 22:12 | |
nacc | mwhudson: i've got a couple php7.0 SRU bugs pending too; would the right thing to do be to submit two debdiffs (one for the two known bugs w/ fixes and then another after that pulling in the new upstream?) | 22:13 |
Grorco | what is the name of the software and updates package? | 22:13 |
mwhudson | nacc: if the bugfixes are in the new upstream release, then aiui, no, just mention all the bugs in the changelog | 22:14 |
Grorco | nevermind I figured it out | 22:16 |
nacc | mwhudson: they aren't (packaging issues) -- i could also fix them in my upstream release update, but i wasn't sure if that would be appropriate or not. | 22:17 |
mwhudson | nacc: ah. still, i think fixing it all at once /probably/ makes sense | 22:18 |
mwhudson | nacc: just write a clear changelog entry | 22:18 |
nacc | mwhudson: yep, i am happy to do it that way (and means only one upload). Will do! | 22:18 |
nacc | mwhudson: thanks for the input! | 22:19 |
mwhudson | nacc: i'm not an expert in predicting the SRU team's desires yet though :-) | 22:19 |
Logan | nacc: cool, I approved your nomination for Xenial | 22:26 |
nacc | Logan: thanks! | 22:37 |
mwhudson | ubuntu@yakkety:~$ du -h `which golang-petname` | 22:42 |
mwhudson | 16K/usr/bin/golang-petname | 22:42 |
mwhudson | \o/ | 22:42 |
sarnold | !! | 22:42 |
sarnold | nice :) | 22:42 |
mwhudson | now i just need to beat go-systemd's upstream heads together to get rid of a dependency loop... | 22:43 |
mwhudson | and MIR golang-github-coreos-pkg-dev (related to above) | 22:44 |
ret2libc | hi. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgjdUkgPiZo at 36:39 he says that the appstream generator will be "in ubuntu, for ubuntu" if i hear it correctly. why not making it available for every distro? | 22:58 |
Grorco | Hello I'm new to this and I'm trying to us bazaar to get a branch of software-properties-gtk and it says it doesn't exist | 23:03 |
Grorco | bzr branch ubuntu:software-properties-gtk software-properties-gtk.dev is what I'm using am I doing something wrong? | 23:05 |
jbicha | bzr branch lp:software-properties | 23:06 |
jbicha | or apt source software-properties | 23:07 |
jbicha | the ubuntu: branches are usually out-of-date these days | 23:07 |
nacc | mwhudson: just an fyi, finally finished refershing the php7.0 patches, build and testing it now locally | 23:38 |
nacc | mwhudson: also filed LP: #1596735 so xenial's version doesn't get ahead of yakkety's | 23:38 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1596735 in php7.0 (Ubuntu) "Please merge with php7.0 7.0.8-2 from Debian unstable" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1596735 | 23:38 |
mwhudson | nacc: looking | 23:41 |
nacc | mwhudson: our delta is pretty trivial, i've subscribed -sponsors already, so only if you have time | 23:52 |
nacc | Logan: had a quick q for you on zabbix. I noticed something kind of funky just now, in that if you install zabbix-server-mysql (or i think zabbix-proxy-mysql) and zabbix-frontend-php, you don't necessarily get php-mysql installed, even though it's a dep of the frotend package. That's because there are three alternatives and it just picks php-pgsql. But the frontend configuration wizard won't even show | 23:56 |
nacc | MySQL as an option for the backing database w/o php-mysql installed. Is there any prior art for handling if pkg A is to be installed and pkg B is installed, then pkg C should be used for an alternative-dep? | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!