[16:17] <flocculant> ochosi: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-desktop/2016-June/004805.html just in case you're not following that list 
[16:20] <flocculant> and for all of us - the 32bit or not, that is the question, discussion has come up again - https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2016-June/016661.html
[16:21]  * flocculant goes back to slumbering in the corner 
[16:31] <genii> Makes me wonder what 3rd party legacy applications will still be around and marginally useful by that time
[16:32]  * flocculant wonders that too - but I have pretty simple requirements :)
[16:33] <Unit193> Nice he checked.
[16:34] <flocculant> who's he? 
[19:10] <ax562> hi
[19:18] <flocculant> hi ax562 
[19:19] <ax562> sup bro
[19:20] <ax562> running 16.04 on a new machine and running 16.10 via vb on it?  #GeekMode - God
[19:21] <flocculant> lol
[19:22] <ax562> 16.04 is really nice
[19:22] <ax562> seems faster in general
[19:22] <flocculant> Unit193: there's a new survey - not majorly public yet, just on m/l - might be worth thinking about us publicising that when it is live on our *things*
[19:24] <flocculant> ax562: didn't notice that tbh
[19:24] <flocculant> but then I probably wouldn't ... 
[19:24] <ax562> probably because these machines are old school
[19:24] <flocculant> not got the fastest cpu here - but it's not got a starting handle 
[19:25] <ax562> vb kinds of takes its toll on resources though lol
[19:25] <flocculant> yup
[20:21] <ochosi> flocculant: i do - thanks for replying there!
[20:22] <flocculant> that's confused me completely - pretty sure I didn't reply there :)
[20:23] <ochosi> oh, different email then
[20:23] <flocculant> :)
[20:23] <ochosi> i guess i should've clicked instead of presuming
[20:24] <flocculant> aah right - this is the 'oh dear, my themeseses broke again' one
[20:24] <flocculant> just thought I would highlight it in here - for Justin Case 
[20:24] <ochosi> yeah
[20:25] <ochosi> i was expecting ubuntu would go 3.20 in the next release
[20:25] <ochosi> because laney put so much effort into it
[20:25] <flocculant> yep - I thought we were expecting that - at least that's what I vaguely remembered
[20:26] <ochosi> well i also once talked to laney when he said he was very sceptical because he didn't want to negatively affect flavours and they had nobody to port their themes
[20:26] <ochosi> now he seems to just have done it all on his own
[20:26] <ochosi> i yet have to test the greybird 3.20 port
[20:26] <ochosi> it's not really what i want, but hey, i didn't have to move a finger so i won't complain
[20:26] <flocculant> :)
[20:27] <ochosi> knome: didn't you say you wanted to help with greybird -> sass? :)
[23:04] <knome> ochosi, maybe... in august or sth